IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jocnur/v27y2018i1-2p193-204.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding the impact of haemodialysis on UK National Health Service patients’ well‐being: A qualitative investigation

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel JW Jones
  • Kate Harvey
  • John P Harris
  • Laurie T Butler
  • Emma C Vaux

Abstract

Aims and objectives While haemodialysis is an effective treatment for end‐stage renal disease, the requirements and restrictions it imposes on patients can be onerous. The aim of this study was to obtain UK National Health Service patients’ perspectives on the challenges arising from haemodialysis with the intention of identifying potential improvements. Background Depression rates are particularly high in those with end‐stage renal disease; however, there is limited insight into the range of stressors associated with haemodialysis treatment within the National Health Service contributing to such high rates, particularly those of a cognitive or psychological nature. Design A qualitative approach was used to obtain rich, patient‐focused data; one‐to‐one semi‐structured interviews were conducted with twenty end‐stage renal disease at a UK National Health Service centre. Methods Patients were interviewed during a typical haemodialysis session. Thematic analysis was used to systematically interpret the data. Codes were created in an inductive and cyclical process using a constant comparative approach. Results Three themes emerged from the data: (i) fluctuations in cognitive/physical well‐being across the haemodialysis cycle, (ii) restrictions arising from the haemodialysis treatment schedule, (iii) emotional impact of haemodialysis on the self and others. The findings are limited to predominantly white, older patients (median = 74 years) within a National Health Service setting. Conclusions Several of the experiences reported by patients as challenging and distressing have so far been overlooked in the literature. A holistic‐based approach to treatment, acknowledging all aspects of a patient's well‐being, is essential if optimal quality of life is to be achieved by healthcare providers. Relevance to clinical practice The findings can be used to inform future interventions and guidelines aimed at improving patients’ treatment adherence and outcomes, for example, improved reliable access to mental health specialists.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel JW Jones & Kate Harvey & John P Harris & Laurie T Butler & Emma C Vaux, 2018. "Understanding the impact of haemodialysis on UK National Health Service patients’ well‐being: A qualitative investigation," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(1-2), pages 193-204, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:1-2:p:193-204
    DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13871
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13871
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/jocn.13871?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Thomas, Carol & Morris, Sara M. & Harman, Juliet C., 2002. "Companions through cancer: : the care given by informal carers in cancer contexts," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 54(4), pages 529-544, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Eileen Suk Ying Ng & Poh Yoong Wong & Ahmad Teguh Hakiki Kamaruddin & Christopher Thiam Seong Lim & Yoke Mun Chan, 2020. "Poor Sleep Quality, Depression and Social Support Are Determinants of Serum Phosphate Level among Hemodialysis Patients in Malaysia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(14), pages 1-14, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Leila Abou Salha & Julio Cesar Souza Silva & Cleusa Alves Martins & Cristiane Soares da Costa Araújo & Edinamar Aparecida Santos da Silva & Angela Gilda Alves & Cácia Régia de Paula & Flavio Henrique , 2021. "Caregivers of Individuals with Cancer in the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Phenomenological Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-11, December.
    2. Emslie, Carol & Browne, Susan & MacLeod, Una & Rozmovits, Linda & Mitchell, Elizabeth & Ziebland, Sue, 2009. "'Getting through' not 'going under': A qualitative study of gender and spousal support after diagnosis with colorectal cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(6), pages 1169-1175, March.
    3. Broom, Alex & Cavenagh, John, 2010. "Masculinity, moralities and being cared for: An exploration of experiences of living and dying in a hospice," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 71(5), pages 869-876, September.
    4. Zhang, Amy Y. & Zyzanski, Stephen J. & Siminoff, Laura A., 2010. "Differential patient-caregiver opinions of treatment and care for advanced lung cancer patients," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(8), pages 1155-1158, April.
    5. Thompson, Tess & Coats, Jacquelyn & Croston, Merriah & Motley, Robert O. & Thompson, Vetta Sanders & James, Aimee S. & Johnson, LaShaune P., 2024. "“We need a little strength as well”: Examining the social context of informal caregivers for Black women with breast cancer," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 342(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jocnur:v:27:y:2018:i:1-2:p:193-204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1365-2702 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.