IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v66y2008i2p260-275.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Contextual analysis of breast and cervical cancer screening and factors associated with health care access among United States women, 2002

Author

Listed:
  • Coughlin, Steven S.
  • Leadbetter, Steven
  • Richards, Thomas
  • Sabatino, Susan A.

Abstract

This research explored the relationships between race/ethnicity and area factors affecting access to health care in the United States. The study represents an advance on previous research in this field because, in addition to including data on rurality, it incorporates additional contextual covariates describing aspects of health care accessibility. Individual-level data were obtained from the 2002 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS). The county of residence reported by BRFSS respondents was used to link BRFSS data with county-level measures of health care access from the 2004 Area Resource File (ARF). Analyses of mammography were limited to women aged [greater-or-equal, slanted]40 years with known county of residence (n=91,492). Analyses of Pap testing were limited to women aged [greater-or-equal, slanted]18 years with no history of hysterectomy and known county of residence (n=97,820). In addition to individual-level covariates such as race, Hispanic ethnicity, health insurance coverage and routine physical exam in the previous year. We examined county-level covariates (residence in health professional shortage area, urban/rural continuum, racial/ethnic composition, and number of health centers/clinics, mammography screening centers, primary care physicians, and obstetrician-gynecologists per 100,000 female population or per 1000 square miles) as predictors of cancer screening. Both individual-level and contextual covariates are associated with the use of breast and cervical cancer screening. In the current study, covariates associated with health care access, such as health insurance coverage, household income, Black race, and percentage of county female population who were non-Hispanic Black, were important determinants of screening use. In multivariate analysis, we found significant interactions between individual-level covariates and contextual covariates. Among women who reside in areas with lower primary care physician supply, rural women are less likely than urban women to have had a recent Pap test. Black women were more likely than White women to have had a recent Pap test. Women with a non-rural county of residence were more likely to have had a recent mammogram than rural women. A significant interaction was also found between individual-level race and number of health centers or clinics per 100,000 population (p-value=0.0187). In counties with 2 or more health centers or clinics per 100,000 female population, Black women were more likely than White women to have had a recent mammogram. A significant interaction was also observed between the percentage of county female population who were Hispanic and the percentage who were non-Hispanic Black.

Suggested Citation

  • Coughlin, Steven S. & Leadbetter, Steven & Richards, Thomas & Sabatino, Susan A., 2008. "Contextual analysis of breast and cervical cancer screening and factors associated with health care access among United States women, 2002," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 66(2), pages 260-275, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:66:y:2008:i:2:p:260-275
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(07)00509-6
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Selvin, E. & Brett, K.M., 2003. "Breast and cervical cancer screening: Sociodemographic predictors among White, Black, and Hispanic women," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 93(4), pages 618-623.
    2. O'Malley, M.S. & Earp, J.A.L. & Hawley, S.T. & Schell, M.J. & Mathews, H.F. & Mitchell, J., 2001. "The association of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and physician recommendation for mammography: Who gets the message about breast cancer screening?," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 91(1), pages 49-54.
    3. Duelberg, Sonia I., 1992. "Preventive health behavior among black and white women in urban and rural areas," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 34(2), pages 191-198, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mubarak Aldosari & Yusnidah Ibrahim & Norlida Binti Abdul Manab & Ebrahim Mohammed Al-Matari & Ebrahim Mohammed Al-Matari & Eqab Aiyadh Alotaibi, 2016. "Linking Cooperative Health Insurance Service Characteristics to Expatriates’ Satisfaction: Mediating Role of Customer Knowledge," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 6(4), pages 1013-1019.
    2. Zimmermann, Kristine & Khare, Manorama M. & Wright, Cherie & Hasler, Allison & Kerch, Sarah & Moehring, Patricia & Geller, Stacie, 2015. "Application of a gender-based approach to conducting a community health assessment for rural women in Southern Illinois," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 27-34.
    3. Misuzu Fujita & Yasunori Sato & Kengo Nagashima & Sho Takahashi & Akira Hata, 2017. "Impact of geographic accessibility on utilization of the annual health check-ups by income level in Japan: A multilevel analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(5), pages 1-14, May.
    4. Mubarak Aldosari & Yusnidah Ibrahim & Norlida Binti Abdul Manab & Ebrahim Mohammed Al-Matari & Ebrahim Mohammed Al-Matari & Eqab Aiyadh Alotaibi, 2016. "Linking Cooperative Health Insurance Service Characteristics to Expatriates’ Satisfaction: Mediating Role of Customer Knowledge," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 6(4), pages 1013-1019.
    5. Vogt, Verena & Siegel, Martin & Sundmacher, Leonie, 2014. "Examining regional variation in the use of cancer screening in Germany," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 74-80.
    6. Gil Lacruz, Ana Isabel & Gil Lacruz, Marta & Gorgemans, Sophie, 2014. "Female preventive practices: Breast and smear tests," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 135-144.
    7. Yunwei Gai & Li Feng & Jing Hao, 2017. "Local Labor Market Condition and Influenza Vaccination," Atlantic Economic Journal, Springer;International Atlantic Economic Society, vol. 45(2), pages 181-199, June.
    8. Mubarak Aldosari & Yusnidah Ibrahim & Norlida Binti Abdul Manab & Ebrahim Mohammed Al-Matari & Ebrahim Mohammed Al-Matari & Eqab Aiyadh Alotaibi, 2016. "Towards a Better Understanding of Foreign Workers’ Satisfaction with Cooperative Health Insurance: The Role of Service Characteristics, Financing, Choice of Plan and Customer Knowledge," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 6(2), pages 270-276.
    9. Corallo, Ashley N. & Croxford, Ruth & Goodman, David C. & Bryan, Elisabeth L. & Srivastava, Divya & Stukel, Therese A., 2014. "A systematic review of medical practice variation in OECD countries," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 5-14.
    10. Yong Kang Cheah & Chor Foon Tang, 2017. "Factors Influencing the use of Preventive Medical Care in Malaysia: Evidence from National Health and Morbidity Survey Data," Asian Economic Journal, East Asian Economic Association, vol. 31(2), pages 119-137, June.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hale Koç & Owen O’Donnell & Tom Van Ourti, 2018. "What Explains Education Disparities in Screening Mammography in the United States? A Comparison with The Netherlands," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-13, September.
    2. Philip B Mason & Frank M. Howell & Jeremy R. Porter, 2014. "Examining Rural-Urban Obesity Trends among Youth in the U.S.: Testing the Socioeconomic Gradient Hypothesis," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 4(12), pages 27-42, December.
    3. Philip B Mason & Frank M. Howell & Jeremy R. Porter, 2014. "Examining Rural-Urban Obesity Trends among Youth in the U.S.: Testing the Socioeconomic Gradient Hypothesis," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 4(12), pages 27-42, December.
    4. Missinne, Sarah & Bracke, Piet, 2015. "A cross-national comparative study on the influence of individual life course factors on mammography screening," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(6), pages 709-719.
    5. Daniel Bremer & Daniel Lüdecke & Olaf von dem Knesebeck, 2019. "Social Relationships, Age and the Use of Preventive Health Services: Findings from the German Ageing Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-14, November.
    6. Tracy MacIntosh & Mayur M Desai & Tene T Lewis & Beth A Jones & Marcella Nunez-Smith, 2013. "Socially-Assigned Race, Healthcare Discrimination and Preventive Healthcare Services," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(5), pages 1-7, May.
    7. Frank J Penedo & Betina Yanez & Sheila F Castañeda & Linda Gallo & Katy Wortman & Natalia Gouskova & Melissa Simon & William Arguelles & Maria Llabre & Lisa Sanchez-Johnsen & Carrie Brintz & Patricia , 2016. "Self-Reported Cancer Prevalence among Hispanics in the US: Results from the Hispanic Community Health Study/Study of Latinos," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, January.
    8. Sarah Hoeck & Johan Van der Heyden & Joanna Geerts & Guido Van Hal, 2013. "Preventive Care Use among the Belgian Elderly Population: Does Socio-Economic Status Matter?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, December.
    9. Margaret A. Brunton, 2009. "The Role of Effective Communication to Enhance Participation in Screening Mammography: A New Zealand Case," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-18, February.
    10. Monica E. Peek & Hui Tang & Algernon Cargill & Marshall H. Chin, 2011. "Are There Racial Differences in Patients’ Shared Decision-Making Preferences and Behaviors among Patients with Diabetes?," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 31(3), pages 422-431, May.
    11. Sabates, Ricardo & Feinstein, Leon, 2006. "The role of education in the uptake of preventative health care: The case of cervical screening in Britain," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(12), pages 2998-3010, June.
    12. Carrieri, Vincenzo & Wuebker, Ansgar, 2013. "Assessing inequalities in preventive care use in Europe," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(3), pages 247-257.
    13. Franz Hackl & Martin Halla & Michael Hummer & Gerald J. Pruckner, 2015. "The Effectiveness of Health Screening," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(8), pages 913-935, August.
    14. Carrieri, V. & Wuebker, A., 2012. "Assessing inequalities in preventive care use in Europe: A special case of health-care inequalities?," Health, Econometrics and Data Group (HEDG) Working Papers 12/25, HEDG, c/o Department of Economics, University of York.
    15. repec:zbw:rwirep:0371 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Vincenzo Carrieri & Ansgar Wübker, 2012. "Assessing Inequalities in Preventive Care Use in Europe," Ruhr Economic Papers 0371, Rheinisch-Westfälisches Institut für Wirtschaftsforschung, Ruhr-Universität Bochum, Universität Dortmund, Universität Duisburg-Essen.
    17. Guangchao Charles Feng & Zhiliang Lin & Wanhua Ou & Xianglin Su & Qing Yan, 2021. "A Model-Based Meta-Analysis of Willingness to Participate in Cancer Screening," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-18, March.
    18. Alexa L. Solazzo & Bridget K. Gorman & Justin T. Denney, 2017. "Cancer Screening Utilization Among U.S. Women: How Mammogram and Pap Test Use Varies Among Heterosexual, Lesbian, and Bisexual Women," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 36(3), pages 357-377, June.
    19. Boyoung Park & Kui Son Choi & Mina Suh & Ji-Yeon Shin & Jae Kwan Jun, 2013. "Factors Associated with Compliance with Recommendations for Liver Cancer Screening in Korea: A Nationwide Survey in Korea," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(6), pages 1-8, June.
    20. Xufeng Fei & Zhaohan Lou & George Christakos & Qingmin Liu & Yanjun Ren & Jiaping Wu, 2016. "A Geographic Analysis about the Spatiotemporal Pattern of Breast Cancer in Hangzhou from 2008 to 2012," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:66:y:2008:i:2:p:260-275. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.