IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v61y2005i8p1835-1845.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Negative affectivity and enhanced symptom reports: Differentiating between symptoms in men and women

Author

Listed:
  • Van Diest, Ilse
  • De Peuter, Steven
  • Eertmans, Audrey
  • Bogaerts, Katleen
  • Victoir, An
  • Van den Bergh, Omer

Abstract

This study aimed to characterize individual bodily symptoms as regards their differential relationship with negative affectivity (NA). In a first step, 73 symptoms were rated by independent groups of raters (psychologists, medical doctors, healthy students) on the following characteristics: the extent to which a symptom (1) refers to a specific location in the body (vagueness), (2) may refer to both a physical condition and a negative emotional state (overlap), and (3) is likely to be a physiological manifestation of anxiety (anxiety). Each symptom was also rated on (4) the probability that it is caused by a clearly defined somatic pathology (somatic pathology), (5) how life-threatening or (6) compromising for the quality of life a symptom is, and (7) how worried one would be if the symptom were to be experienced in daily life (worrying). Two factors, severity and somatic versus psychic, explained 75% of the variance in the ratings on the symptom characteristics. Next, based on the data of 1017 university students (858 women), correlations of each individual symptom with NA were calculated for each gender. The pattern of correlation was highly variable and differed in important ways for men and women. Whereas the correlation of an individual symptom with NA could be predicted by both symptom factors in women (R2=52%), only the somatic versus psychic factor was a significant predictor in men (R2=11%). These results suggest that (1) NA should not be considered a general complaining factor, and (2) important gender differences exist regarding the type of symptoms that relate most strongly to NA.

Suggested Citation

  • Van Diest, Ilse & De Peuter, Steven & Eertmans, Audrey & Bogaerts, Katleen & Victoir, An & Van den Bergh, Omer, 2005. "Negative affectivity and enhanced symptom reports: Differentiating between symptoms in men and women," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(8), pages 1835-1845, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:61:y:2005:i:8:p:1835-1845
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277-9536(05)00130-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Vassend, Olav, 1989. "Dimensions of negative affectivity, self-reported somatic symptoms, and health-related behaviors," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 29-36, January.
    2. Vassend, Olav & Watten, Reidulf & Myhrer, Trond & Syvertsen, Jon Lars, 1994. "Negative affectivity and intellectual ability: A study of their relation to self-reported physical symptoms, perceived daily stress and mood, and disciplinary problems in military recruits," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 583-590, August.
    3. Gijsbers van Wijk, Cecile M. T. & Huisman, Henk & Kolk, Annemarie M., 1999. "Gender differences in physical symptoms and illness behavior: A health diary study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 49(8), pages 1061-1074, October.
    4. Kolk, Annemarie M. & Hanewald, Gerrit J. F. P. & Schagen, Simon & Gijsbers van Wijk, Cecile M. T., 2003. "A symptom perception approach to common physical symptoms," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 57(12), pages 2343-2354, December.
    5. van Wijk, Cécile M. T. Gijsbers & Kolk, Annemarie M., 1997. "Sex differences in physical symptoms: The contribution of symptom perception theory," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 45(2), pages 231-246, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Leger, Kate A. & Charles, Susan T. & Ayanian, John Z. & Almeida, David M., 2015. "The association of daily physical symptoms with future health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 241-248.
    2. Koopmans, Gerrit T. & Lamers, Leida M., 2007. "Gender and health care utilization: The role of mental distress and help-seeking propensity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(6), pages 1216-1230, March.
    3. Katleen Bogaerts & Liselotte Rayen & Ann Lavrysen & Ilse Van Diest & Thomas Janssens & Koen Schruers & Omer Van den Bergh, 2015. "Unraveling the Relationship between Trait Negative Affectivity and Habitual Symptom Reporting," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. David C Currow & Katherine Clark & Geoffrey K Mitchell & Miriam J Johnson & Amy P Abernethy, 2013. "Prospectively Collected Characteristics of Adult Patients, Their Consultations and Outcomes as They Report Breathlessness When Presenting to General Practice in Australia," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(9), pages 1-1, September.
    2. Koopmans, Gerrit T. & Lamers, Leida M., 2007. "Gender and health care utilization: The role of mental distress and help-seeking propensity," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 64(6), pages 1216-1230, March.
    3. Sumbol Fiaz & Muhammad Azeem Qureshi, 2021. "How perceived organizational politics cause work-to-family conflict? Scoping and systematic review of literature," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-18, December.
    4. Orfila, Francesc & Ferrer, Montserrat & Lamarca, Rosa & Tebe, Cristian & Domingo-Salvany, Antonia & Alonso, Jordi, 2006. "Gender differences in health-related quality of life among the elderly: The role of objective functional capacity and chronic conditions," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(9), pages 2367-2380, November.
    5. Mei‐Chih Meg Tseng & Yi‐Ping Lin & Fu‐Chang Hu & Tsun‐Jen Cheng, 2013. "Risks Perception of Electromagnetic Fields in Taiwan: The Influence of Psychopathology and the Degree of Sensitivity to Electromagnetic Fields," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(11), pages 2002-2012, November.
    6. Katleen Bogaerts & Liselotte Rayen & Ann Lavrysen & Ilse Van Diest & Thomas Janssens & Koen Schruers & Omer Van den Bergh, 2015. "Unraveling the Relationship between Trait Negative Affectivity and Habitual Symptom Reporting," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(1), pages 1-15, January.
    7. Brandner, Susanne & Müller-Nordhorn, Jacqueline & Stritter, Wiebke & Fotopoulou, Christina & Sehouli, Jalid & Holmberg, Christine, 2014. "Symptomization and triggering processes: Ovarian cancer patients' narratives on pre-diagnostic sensation experiences and the initiation of healthcare seeking," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 123-130.
    8. Torsheim, Torbjørn & Ravens-Sieberer, Ulrike & Hetland, Jorn & Välimaa, Raili & Danielson, Mia & Overpeck, Mary, 2006. "Cross-national variation of gender differences in adolescent subjective health in Europe and North America," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 62(4), pages 815-827, February.
    9. Quan-Hoang Vuong, 2017. "Psychological gender differences in general health examinations: evidence from a 2016 Vietnamese cross-section dataset," Working Papers CEB 17-005, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    10. Frida Thorsen & Carl Antonson & Jan Sundquist & Kristina Sundquist, 2016. "Perceived Stress and Psychiatric Symptoms in Swedish Upper Secondary School Students," Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 6(2), pages 183-183, November.
    11. Thomas Heilskov-Hansen & Susanne Wulff Svendsen & Jane Frølund Thomsen & Sigurd Mikkelsen & Gert-Åke Hansson, 2014. "Sex Differences in Task Distribution and Task Exposures among Danish House Painters: An Observational Study Combining Questionnaire Data with Biomechanical Measurements," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 9(11), pages 1-10, November.
    12. Schroeder, Ryan D. & Hill, Terrence D. & Haynes, Stacy Hoskins & Bradley, Christopher, 2011. "Physical health and crime among low-income urban women: An application of general strain theory," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 21-29.
    13. Jungsun Park & Yangho Kim, 2020. "Association of Exposure to a Combination of Ergonomic Risk Factors with Musculoskeletal Symptoms in Korean Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-10, December.
    14. M. A. Kaneva, 2021. "Health Capital Estimates for Russian Regions in 2004–2018," Regional Research of Russia, Springer, vol. 11(4), pages 524-532, October.
    15. Quan-Hoang Vuong & Kien-Cuong P. Nghiem & Viet-Phuong La & Thu-Trang Vuong & Hong-Kong T. Nguyen & Manh-Toan Ho & Kien Tran & Thu-Hong Khuat & Manh-Tung Ho, 2019. "Sex Differences and Psychological Factors Associated with General Health Examinations Participation: Results from a Vietnamese Cross-Section Dataset," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-13, January.
    16. Gail Pacheco & Dom Page & Don Webber, 2012. "Mental and physical health: reconceptualising the relationship with employment propensity," Working Papers 20121206, Department of Accounting, Economics and Finance, Bristol Business School, University of the West of England, Bristol.
    17. Gail Pacheco & Don J. Webber, 2011. "Employment propensity: The roles of mental and physical health," Working Papers 2011-01, Auckland University of Technology, Department of Economics.
    18. Whitehead, Brenda R. & Bergeman, C.S., 2016. "Affective health bias in older adults: Considering positive and negative affect in a general health context," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 28-35.
    19. MacLean, Alice & Sweeting, Helen & Hunt, Kate, 2010. "'Rules' for boys, 'guidelines' for girls: Gender differences in symptom reporting during childhood and adolescence," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 70(4), pages 597-604, February.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:61:y:2005:i:8:p:1835-1845. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.