IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v345y2024ics0277953624001060.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evaluating the use of casuistry during moral case deliberation in the ICU: A multiple qualitative case study

Author

Listed:
  • Kok, Niek
  • Hoedemaekers, Cornelia
  • Fuchs, Malaika
  • van der Hoeven, Hans
  • Zegers, Marieke
  • van Gurp, Jelle

Abstract

Intensive care unit (ICU) professionals engage in ethical decision making under conditions of high stakes, great uncertainty, time-sensitivity and frequent irreversibility of action. Casuistry is a way by which actionable knowledge is obtained through comparing a patient case to previous cases from experience in clinical practice. However, within the field of study as well as in practice, evidence-based medicine is the dominant epistemic framework. This multiple case study evaluated the use of casuistic reasoning by intensive care unit (ICU) professionals during moral case deliberation. It took place in two Dutch hospitals between June 2020 and June 2022. Twentyfive moral case deliberations from ICU practice were recorded and analyzed using discourse analysis. Additionally, 47 interviews were held with ICU professionals who participated in these deliberations, analyzed using thematic analysis. We found that ICU professionals made considerable use of case comparisons when discussing continuation, withdrawal or limitation. Analogies played a role in justifying or complicating moral judgements, and also played a role in addressing moral distress. The language of case-based arguments is most often not overtly normative. Rather, the data shows that casuistic reasoning deals with the medical, ethical and contextual elements of decisions in an integrated manner. Facilitators of MCD have an essential role in (supporting ICU professionals in) scrutinizing casuistic arguments. The data shows that during MCD, actual reasoning often deviated from principle- and rule-based reasoning which ICU professionals preferred themselves. Evidence-based arguments often gained the character of analogical arguments, especially when a patient-at-hand was seen as highly unique from the average patients in the literature. Casuistic arguments disguised as evidence-based arguments may therefore provide ICU professionals with a false sense of certainty. Within education, we should strive to train clinicians and ethics facilitators so that they can recognize and evaluate casuistic arguments.

Suggested Citation

  • Kok, Niek & Hoedemaekers, Cornelia & Fuchs, Malaika & van der Hoeven, Hans & Zegers, Marieke & van Gurp, Jelle, 2024. "Evaluating the use of casuistry during moral case deliberation in the ICU: A multiple qualitative case study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:345:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624001060
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116662
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953624001060
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116662?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jordan, Brigitte, 1989. "Cosmopolitical obstetrics: Some insights from the training of traditional midwives," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 28(9), pages 925-937, January.
    2. Wieringa, Sietse & Engebretsen, Eivind & Heggen, Kristin & Greenhalgh, Trish, 2021. "Clinical guidelines and the pursuit of reducing epistemic uncertainty. An ethnographic study of guideline development panels in three countries," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 272(C).
    3. Hoffmaster, Barry, 1992. "Can ethnography save the life of medical ethics?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 1421-1431, December.
    4. Braunack-Mayer, Annette, 2001. "Casuistry as bioethical method: an empirical perspective," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 53(1), pages 71-81, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lösch, Lea & Willems, Willemine & Bongers, Marloes & Timen, Aura & Zuiderent-Jerak, Teun, 2023. "Kaleidoscopic integration: Advancing the integration of incommensurable knowledge in healthcare guidelines," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 339(C).
    2. Lensjø, Marit, 2020. "Stories of learning: A case study of Norwegian plumbers and apprentices in TVET at the construction site and in a training agency," International Journal for Research in Vocational Education and Training (IJRVET), European Research Network in Vocational Education and Training (VETNET), European Educational Research Association, vol. 7(2), pages 148-166.
    3. Petersen, Alan, 2013. "From bioethics to a sociology of bio-knowledge," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 264-270.
    4. Carrie R. Leana & Frits K. Pil, 2006. "Social Capital and Organizational Performance: Evidence from Urban Public Schools," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 353-366, June.
    5. Huniche, Lotte, 2011. "Moral landscapes and everyday life in families with Huntington's disease: Aligning ethnographic description and bioethics," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(11), pages 1810-1816, June.
    6. Gerrits, Trudie & Reis, Ria & Braat, Didi, D.M. & Kremer, Jan, A.M. & Hardon, Anita, P., 2013. "Bioethics in practice: Addressing ethically sensitive requests in a Dutch fertility clinic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 330-339.
    7. Costa, Nathalia & Mescouto, Karime & Dillon, Miriam & Olson, Rebecca & Butler, Prudence & Forbes, Roma & Setchell, Jenny, 2022. "The ubiquity of uncertainty in low back pain care," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    8. Kathy Charmaz & Virginia Olesen, 1997. "Ethnographic Research in Medical Sociology," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 25(4), pages 452-494, May.
    9. Britt, David W. & Evans, Mark I., 2007. "Sometimes doing the right thing sucks: Frame combinations and multi-fetal pregnancy reduction decision difficulty," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(11), pages 2342-2356, December.
    10. Molyneux, C.S. & Wassenaar, D.R. & Peshu, N. & Marsh, K., 2005. "'Even if they ask you to stand by a tree all day, you will have to do it (laughter)...!': Community voices on the notion and practice of informed consent for biomedical research in developing countrie," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 443-454, July.
    11. Diane E. Bailey & Stephen R. Barley, 2011. "Teaching-Learning Ecologies: Mapping the Environment to Structure Through Action," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(1), pages 262-285, February.
    12. Parker, Michael, 2007. "Ethnography/ethics," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(11), pages 2248-2259, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:345:y:2024:i:c:s0277953624001060. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.