IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v72y2011i11p1810-1816.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Moral landscapes and everyday life in families with Huntington's disease: Aligning ethnographic description and bioethics

Author

Listed:
  • Huniche, Lotte

Abstract

This article is concerned with understanding moral aspects of everyday life in families with Huntington's Disease (HD). It draws on findings from an empirical research project in Denmark in 1998-2002 involving multi-sited ethnography to argue that medical genetics provides a particular framework for conducting life in an HD family. A framework that implies that being informed and making use of genetic services expresses greater moral responsibility than conducting life without drawing on these resources. The moral imperative of engagement in medical genetics is challenged here by two pieces of ethnographic analysis. The first concerns a person who, as described by a family member, does not engage with medical genetics but who brings to the fore other culturally legitimate concerns, priorities and areas of responsibility. The second figures a genetic counselling session where neither the knowledge nor the imagined solutions of medical genetics are as unproblematic and straightforward as might be thought. To assist our understanding of the moral aspects of living with severe familial disease, the ethnographic analysis is aligned with bioethical reflections that place the concrete concerns of those personally involved centre stage in the development of theoretical stances that aim to assist reflections in practice.

Suggested Citation

  • Huniche, Lotte, 2011. "Moral landscapes and everyday life in families with Huntington's disease: Aligning ethnographic description and bioethics," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(11), pages 1810-1816, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:72:y:2011:i:11:p:1810-1816
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953610005460
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Forrest Keenan, Karen & van Teijlingen, Edwin & McKee, Lorna & Miedzybrodzka, Zosia & Simpson, Sheila A., 2009. "How young people find out about their family history of Huntington's disease," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 68(10), pages 1892-1900, May.
    2. Koch, Lene & Nordahl Svendsen, Mette, 2005. "Providing solutions-defining problems: the imperative of disease prevention in genetic counselling," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 60(4), pages 823-832, February.
    3. Hoffmaster, Barry, 1992. "Can ethnography save the life of medical ethics?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 35(12), pages 1421-1431, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sheikh, Zainab Afshan & Jensen, Anja M.B., 2019. "Channeling hope: An ethnographic study of how research encounters become meaningful for families suffering from genetic disease in Pakistan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 103-110.
    2. Derbez, Benjamin, 2018. "Is there a “right time” for bad news? Kairos in familial communication on hereditary breast and ovarian cancer risk," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 13-19.
    3. Flanagan, Kathleen, 2022. "‘A medical case history … ’: Huntington’s disease and psychiatry," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Petersen, Alan, 2013. "From bioethics to a sociology of bio-knowledge," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 264-270.
    2. Clarke, Angus & Sarangi, Srikant & Verrier-Jones, Kate, 2011. "Voicing the lifeworld: Parental accounts of responsibility in genetic consultations for polycystic kidney disease," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(11), pages 1743-1751, June.
    3. Gerrits, Trudie & Reis, Ria & Braat, Didi, D.M. & Kremer, Jan, A.M. & Hardon, Anita, P., 2013. "Bioethics in practice: Addressing ethically sensitive requests in a Dutch fertility clinic," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 330-339.
    4. Miller, Fiona Alice & Giacomini, Mita & Ahern, Catherine, 2008. "Contending visions in the evolution of genetic medicine: The case of cancer genetic services in Ontario, Canada," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 67(1), pages 152-160, July.
    5. Kok, Niek & Hoedemaekers, Cornelia & Fuchs, Malaika & van der Hoeven, Hans & Zegers, Marieke & van Gurp, Jelle, 2024. "Evaluating the use of casuistry during moral case deliberation in the ICU: A multiple qualitative case study," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).
    6. Kathy Charmaz & Virginia Olesen, 1997. "Ethnographic Research in Medical Sociology," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 25(4), pages 452-494, May.
    7. Kavanaugh, Melinda S. & Cho, Chi & Maeda, Hotaka & Swope, Chandler, 2017. "“I am no longer alone”: Evaluation of the first North American camp for youth living in families with Huntington's disease," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 325-332.
    8. Molyneux, C.S. & Wassenaar, D.R. & Peshu, N. & Marsh, K., 2005. "'Even if they ask you to stand by a tree all day, you will have to do it (laughter)...!': Community voices on the notion and practice of informed consent for biomedical research in developing countrie," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 61(2), pages 443-454, July.
    9. Barberić Lara, 2013. "Genetic Knowledge and Genetic Reproduction Technologies as New Modes of Governance – are We Witnessing a New Form of Eugenics?," Croatian International Relations Review, Sciendo, vol. 19(69), pages 33-54, December.
    10. Martha Driessnack & Janet K. Williams & J. Jackson Barnette & Kathleen J. Sparbel & Jane S. Paulsen, 2012. "Development of the HD-Teen Inventory," Clinical Nursing Research, , vol. 21(2), pages 213-223, May.
    11. Weiner, Kate, 2011. "Exploring genetic responsibility for the self, family and kin in the case of hereditary raised cholesterol," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 72(11), pages 1760-1767, June.
    12. Parker, Michael, 2007. "Ethnography/ethics," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(11), pages 2248-2259, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:72:y:2011:i:11:p:1810-1816. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.