IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/socmed/v230y2019icp49-56.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Family planning, Islam and sin: Understandings of moral actions in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Ataullahjan, Anushka
  • Mumtaz, Zubia
  • Vallianatos, Helen

Abstract

Pakistan, with a population of over 207 million, is the sixth most populous country in the world. Yet, only 25% of eligible couples' report using a modern contraceptive method. A large body of literature indicates the existence of a widely-held perception among Pakistanis that family planning use is a sin, which is then often cited as evidence that Islamic beliefs impede contraceptive use (see Agha, 2010; Ali and Ushijima, 2005; Azmat, 2011; Zafar et al., 2003). We argue that this body of literature, which has relied primarily on quantitative measures and survey methodology, is highly reductive. Missing from this discourse is a nuanced analysis of how individuals engage with their Islamic beliefs to make fertility decisions. Drawing on 13 months of ethnographic data, our findings demonstrate that despite most of our respondents overwhelmingly believing that family planning use was a sin, many had, at some stage, tried to control their fertility. Our findings evidenced that respondents’ beliefs surrounding the morality of fertility control was informed by multiple moral registers beyond Islam. For our respondents, moral action was informed by interpretations of Islamic teachings, economic insecurity, socioeconomic inequities, community/public discourse, and geopolitics. We argue there is a need to complicate our understanding of how Islam shapes reproductive strategies in Pakistan, and its relative importance in contraceptive decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Ataullahjan, Anushka & Mumtaz, Zubia & Vallianatos, Helen, 2019. "Family planning, Islam and sin: Understandings of moral actions in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 49-56.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:230:y:2019:i:c:p:49-56
    DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.03.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0277953619301534
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.03.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Krehbiel Keefe, Susi, 2006. ""Women do what they want": Islam and permanent contraception in Northern Tanzania," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(2), pages 418-429, July.
    2. Jeffery, Patricia & Jeffery, Roger, 2002. "A Population Out of Control? Myths About Muslim Fertility in Contemporary India," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(10), pages 1805-1822, October.
    3. Farida Shaheed, 2010. "Contested Identities: gendered politics, gendered religion in Pakistan," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 851-867.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Aissata Mahamadou Sidibe & Paul I Kadetz & Therese Hesketh, 2020. "Factors Impacting Family Planning Use in Mali and Senegal," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(12), pages 1-15, June.
    2. Adnan Muhammad Shah & KangYoon Lee & Javaria Nisa Mir, 2021. "Exploring Readiness for Birth Control in Improving Women Health Status: Factors Influencing the Adoption of Modern Contraceptives Methods for Family Planning Practices," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-20, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Carranza, Eliana, 2012. "Islamic inheritance law, son preference and fertility behavior of Muslim couples in Indonesia," Policy Research Working Paper Series 5972, The World Bank.
    2. Nausheen H Anwar & Amiera Sawas & Daanish Mustafa, 2020. "‘Without water, there is no life’: Negotiating everyday risks and gendered insecurities in Karachi’s informal settlements," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(6), pages 1320-1337, May.
    3. Muhammad Safdar & Musarat Yasmin, 2020. "COVID‐19: A threat to educated Muslim women's negotiated identity in Pakistan," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(5), pages 683-694, September.
    4. M. Niaz Asadullah & Uma Kambhampati & Florencia Lopez Boo, 2014. "Social divisions in school participation and attainment in India: 1983–2004," Cambridge Journal of Economics, Cambridge Political Economy Society, vol. 38(4), pages 869-893.
    5. Chouhan, Pradip & Saha, Jay & Zaveri, Ankita, 2020. "Covariates of fertility behavior among ever-married women in West Bengal, India: Analysis of the National Family Health Survey-4," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    6. Murthi, Mamta, 2002. "Fertility Change in Asia and Africa," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(10), pages 1769-1778, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:socmed:v:230:y:2019:i:c:p:49-56. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/315/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.