IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/gender/v27y2020i5p683-694.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

COVID‐19: A threat to educated Muslim women's negotiated identity in Pakistan

Author

Listed:
  • Muhammad Safdar
  • Musarat Yasmin

Abstract

This study attempts to explore how the lockdown/containment measures taken by the government during the COVID‐19 pandemic have threatened educated Muslim women's negotiated identity regarding wifehood and motherhood in urban Pakistan and how they struggle to reposition to reconstruct it. Through semi‐structured interviews, making an in‐depth comparative study of three differently situated cases (Muslim women), this study argues that the abnormal situation that has ensued from the pandemic has reinforced the vulnerability of women's nascent negotiated identity by landing them in a space where they are supposed by the normative structures to step back to carrying out their traditional responsibilities as ‘good’ wife and mother during the crisis. It has found that the pandemic has similarity in its impacts for the women in their familial lives, despite their being variously situated and resistive, due to the general religio‐culturally defined patriarchal social behaviour of the place (Pakistan) toward women and lack of action on the part of the state for implementing its laws of women's empowerment.

Suggested Citation

  • Muhammad Safdar & Musarat Yasmin, 2020. "COVID‐19: A threat to educated Muslim women's negotiated identity in Pakistan," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(5), pages 683-694, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:27:y:2020:i:5:p:683-694
    DOI: 10.1111/gwao.12457
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/gwao.12457
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/gwao.12457?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Farida Shaheed, 2010. "Contested Identities: gendered politics, gendered religion in Pakistan," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 851-867.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lateef, Rusan & Alaggia, Ramona & Collin-Vézina, Delphine, 2021. "A scoping review on psychosocial consequences of pandemics on parents and children: Planning for today and the future," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    2. Simel Parlak & Oya Celebi Cakiroglu & Feride Oksuz Gul, 2021. "Gender roles during COVID‐19 pandemic: The experiences of Turkish female academics," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(S2), pages 461-483, July.
    3. Asiya Islam, 2021. "“Two hours extra for working from home”: Reporting on gender, space, and time from the Covid‐field of Delhi, India," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(S2), pages 405-414, July.
    4. Maksimus Regus, 2021. "Narratives of life‐maneuvering in reshaping new living space during Covid‐19: A case study of women activist in Manggarai Region, Eastern Indonesia," Gender, Work and Organization, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 28(S2), pages 566-573, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nausheen H Anwar & Amiera Sawas & Daanish Mustafa, 2020. "‘Without water, there is no life’: Negotiating everyday risks and gendered insecurities in Karachi’s informal settlements," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 57(6), pages 1320-1337, May.
    2. Ataullahjan, Anushka & Mumtaz, Zubia & Vallianatos, Helen, 2019. "Family planning, Islam and sin: Understandings of moral actions in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 230(C), pages 49-56.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:bla:gender:v:27:y:2020:i:5:p:683-694. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.blackwellpublishing.com/journal.asp?ref=0968-6673 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.