IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v91y2024ics0038012123002781.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessing the triage and efficacy of strategies of SAARC to improve regional integrity of South Asia using multicriteria group decision making under q-rung orthopair hesitant fuzzy environment

Author

Listed:
  • Gayen, Souvik
  • Banerjee, Debamitra
  • Sarkar, Arun
  • Biswas, Animesh

Abstract

The South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) plays a crucial role in fostering regional integration and cooperation among the countries of South Asia. However, the organization faces various challenges in achieving its objectives due to the complex and dynamic nature of the region. This study aims to assess the triage and efficacy of strategies employed by SAARC in pursuit of regional integrity in South Asia, using a Multi-Criteria Group Decision Making (MCGDM) technique. The assessment process involves several uncertainties which are resolved using q-rung orthopair hesitant fuzzy (q-ROHF) set. A distance measure is developed for q-ROHF sets and is applied to find the best strategy among six well known strategies, viz., SAARC Agreement on Trade in Services (SATIS), SAARC Development Fund (SDF), Establishment of South Asian University (SAU), SAARC Arbitration Council (SARCO), South Asian Preferential Trade Agreement (SAPTA) and South Asian Free Trade Area (SAFTA) through SWARA-TOPSIS based MCGDM technique. The MCGDM method is updated by developing several aggregation operators, viz., Archimedean q-ROHF weighted average, q-ROHF Einstein weighted average, q-ROHF Hamacher weighted average, q-ROHF Frank weighted average along with their geometric forms to combine decision makers’ individual decision. The result shows that the most effective strategy for the economic integration of SAARC is SDF; SATIS comes next as best strategy for economic integration of SAARC. The study reveals that SAU has least impact on the regional economic integration of SAARC. The achieved results reveals the age old proverb that “play on the stomach and sit on the back” – the members of SAARC who are by nature economically poor can afford to take initiative for a successful effective regionalization if it is planned to bring socio economic development of themselves.

Suggested Citation

  • Gayen, Souvik & Banerjee, Debamitra & Sarkar, Arun & Biswas, Animesh, 2024. "Assessing the triage and efficacy of strategies of SAARC to improve regional integrity of South Asia using multicriteria group decision making under q-rung orthopair hesitant fuzzy environment," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:91:y:2024:i:c:s0038012123002781
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2023.101766
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012123002781
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2023.101766?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ayyildiz, Ertugrul, 2022. "Fermatean fuzzy step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) and its application to prioritizing indicators to achieve sustainable development goal-7," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 136-148.
    2. Muhammad Muzaffar & Iqra Jathol & Zahid Yaseen, 2017. "SAARC: An Evaluation of its Achievements, Failures, and Compulsion for Cooperation," Global Economics Review, Humanity Only, vol. 2(1), pages 36-45, December.
    3. Muhammad Muzaffar & Iqra Jathol & Zahid Yaseen, 2017. "SAARC: An Evaluation of its Achievements, Failures, and Compulsion for Cooperation," Global Political Review, Humanity Only, vol. 2(1), pages 36-45, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Zeb, Aurang & Ahmad, Waseem & Asif, Muhammad & Simic, Vladimir & Senapati, Tapan & Hou, Muzhou, 2024. "Optimizing decision-making in electric power system selection: A generalized approach based on Hamacher aggregation operators for q-rung orthopair fuzzy soft sets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 367(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ağbulut, Ümit & Sarıdemir, Suat, 2024. "Synergistic effects of hybrid nanoparticles along with conventional fuel on engine performance, combustion, and environmental characteristics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 292(C).
    2. Sahin, Aleyna & Imamoglu, Gul & Murat, Mirac & Ayyildiz, Ertugrul, 2024. "A holistic decision-making approach to assessing service quality in higher education institutions," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    3. Ebrahim Aghazadeh & Hasan Yildirim & Murat Kuruoglu, 2022. "A Hybrid Fuzzy MCDM Methodology for Optimal Structural System Selection Compatible with Sustainable Materials in Mass-Housing Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-22, October.
    4. Tao, Yongming & Muneeb, Farhan Muhammad & Wanke, Peter Fernandes & Tan, Yong & Yazdi, Amir Karbassi, 2024. "Revisiting the critical success factors of entrepreneurship to promote Chinese agriculture systems: A multi-criteria decision-making approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    5. Vaziri Rad, Mohammad Amin & Forootan Fard, Habib & Khazanedari, Kian & Toopshekan, Ashkan & Ourang, Shiva & Khanali, Majid & Gorjian, Shiva & Fereidooni, Leila & Kasaeian, Alibakhsh, 2024. "A global framework for maximizing sustainable development indexes in agri-photovoltaic-based renewable systems: Integrating DEMATEL, ANP, and MCDM methods," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:91:y:2024:i:c:s0038012123002781. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.