IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v79y2022ics0038012121001348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Supplier selection in the oil & gas industry: A comprehensive approach for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Yazdi, Amir Karbassi
  • Wanke, Peter Fernandes
  • Hanne, Thomas
  • Abdi, Farshid
  • Sarfaraz, Amir Homayoun

Abstract

The focus of this paper is on selecting suppliers in the Oil and Gas (O&G) industry by developing a comprehensive approach for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) based on alternative methods capable of assessing different aspects of supplier selection uncertainty in terms of utility functions and criteria related to efficiency. The O&G industry has a key role in the public sector of various countries such as Iran with its revenues being of prime importance to develop infrastructure facilities such as for healthcare, education, and transportation. This comprehensive approach walks through various stages for selecting Critical Success Factors (CSFs), ranking suppliers, and for setting partial weighting alternatives. While CSFs are selected using a traditional Delphi approach, the partial supplier rankings are defined based on Complex Proportional Assessment (COPRAS) utility functions together with criteria weights derived from Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis (SWARA) for each CSF. As it concerns information reliability of utility and efficiency functions of both methods obtained via expert preferences or perceptions, Z-numbers are used to address the intrinsic fuzziness level inherent to each analytical stage. Iran's economy depends on revenues from oil and other related production, which means that by earning more income from this industry, most of its economic indicators such as GDP and employment rate should increase significantly, thus leading to economic growth. Various countries put plans in place related to production for increasing their social economics. One of these plans is focused on suppliers since they have a high impact on providing essential items such as equipment, HR, and transportation, so by choosing the best suppliers in all fields, costs will decrease and consequently revenue will increase. This research points out how to rank O&G industry suppliers using MCDA methods in an uncertain environment. An example based on actual data from an Iranian O&G company is provided to show the applicability of the approach proposed. Results suggest that the complexity of O&G operations on selecting suppliers can be adequately handled by information reliability techniques applied to traditional economic concepts such as utility- and efficiency-related factors, particularly in business environments characterized by a trade embargo.

Suggested Citation

  • Yazdi, Amir Karbassi & Wanke, Peter Fernandes & Hanne, Thomas & Abdi, Farshid & Sarfaraz, Amir Homayoun, 2022. "Supplier selection in the oil & gas industry: A comprehensive approach for Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:79:y:2022:i:c:s0038012121001348
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2021.101142
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012121001348
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101142?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chan, Felix T.S. & Kumar, Niraj, 2007. "Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 417-431, August.
    2. Janssen, Marijn & van der Voort, Haiko & Wahyudi, Agung, 2017. "Factors influencing big data decision-making quality," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 338-345.
    3. Amir Karbassi Yazdi & Masoud Haddadi, 2018. "Prioritising critical successful factors of knowledge management in insurance companies," International Journal of Operational Research, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 31(3), pages 281-299.
    4. Liu, Jian & Zhao, Hong-Kuan & Li, Zhao-Bin & Liu, Si-Feng, 2017. "Decision process in MCDM with large number of criteria and heterogeneous risk preferences," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 4(C), pages 106-112.
    5. Feng, Bo & Fan, Zhi-Ping & Li, Yanzhi, 2011. "A decision method for supplier selection in multi-service outsourcing," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 240-250, August.
    6. James S. Dyer & Peter C. Fishburn & Ralph E. Steuer & Jyrki Wallenius & Stanley Zionts, 1992. "Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: The Next Ten Years," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 38(5), pages 645-654, May.
    7. Reza Kiani Mavi, 2015. "Green supplier selection: a fuzzy AHP and fuzzy ARAS approach," International Journal of Services and Operations Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 22(2), pages 165-188.
    8. Theodor J. Stewart & Ian Durbach, 2016. "Dealing with Uncertainties in MCDA," International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, in: Salvatore Greco & Matthias Ehrgott & José Rui Figueira (ed.), Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, edition 2, chapter 0, pages 467-496, Springer.
    9. Peng Jiang & Yi‐Chung Hu & Ghi‐Feng Yen & Shu‐Ju Tsao, 2018. "Green supplier selection for sustainable development of the automotive industry using grey decision‐making," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(6), pages 890-903, November.
    10. Liang, Gin-Shuh & Wang, Mao-Jiun J., 1994. "Personnel selection using fuzzy MCDM algorithm," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 78(1), pages 22-33, October.
    11. de Almeida, Jonatas Araujo & Costa, Ana Paula Cabral Seixas & de Almeida-Filho, Adiel Teixeira, 2016. "A new method for elicitation of criteria weights in additive models: Flexible and interactive tradeoffAuthor-Name: de Almeida, Adiel Teixeira," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(1), pages 179-191.
    12. Muhammad Shahid Hassan & Muhammad Naveed Tahir & Ayesha Wajid & Haider Mahmood & Abdul Farooq, 2018. "Natural Gas Consumption and Economic Growth in Pakistan: Production Function Approach," Global Business Review, International Management Institute, vol. 19(2), pages 297-310, April.
    13. Büyüközkan, Gülçin & Güleryüz, Sezin & Karpak, Birsen, 2017. "A new combined IF-DEMATEL and IF-ANP approach for CRM partner evaluation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 191(C), pages 194-206.
    14. Ebru Turanoglu Bekar & Mehmet Cakmakci & Cengiz Kahraman, 2016. "Fuzzy COPRAS method for performance measurement in total productive maintenance: a comparative analysis," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(5), pages 663-684, September.
    15. Amir Karbassi Yazdi & Thomas Hanne & Juan Carlos Osorio Gómez & Jorge Luis García Alcaraz, 2018. "Finding the Best Third-Party Logistics in the Automobile Industry: A Hybrid Approach," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2018, pages 1-19, November.
    16. Thomas L. Saaty, 1987. "Risk—Its Priority and Probability: The Analytic Hierarchy Process," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(2), pages 159-172, June.
    17. Kiani, Behdad & Ali Pourfakhraei, Mohammad, 2010. "A system dynamic model for production and consumption policy in Iran oil and gas sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(12), pages 7764-7774, December.
    18. Qin, Jindong & Liu, Xinwang & Pedrycz, Witold, 2017. "An extended TODIM multi-criteria group decision making method for green supplier selection in interval type-2 fuzzy environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(2), pages 626-638.
    19. Morteza Yazdani & Sarfaraz Hashemkhani Zolfani & Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas, 2016. "New integration of MCDM methods and QFD in the selection of green suppliers," Journal of Business Economics and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 17(6), pages 1097-1113, November.
    20. José Felipe Figueiredo Barata & Osvaldo Luiz Gonçalves Quelhas & Helder Gomes Costa & Ruben Huamanchumo Gutierrez & Valdir De Jesus Lameira & Marcelo J. Meiriño, 2014. "Multi-Criteria Indicator for Sustainability Rating in Suppliers of the Oil and Gas Industries in Brazil," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 6(3), pages 1-22, February.
    21. Yuangao Chen & Shuo Wang & Jianrong Yao & Yixiao Li & Shuiqing Yang, 2018. "Socially responsible supplier selection and sustainable supply chain development: A combined approach of total interpretive structural modeling and fuzzy analytic network process," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 27(8), pages 1708-1719, December.
    22. Lotfi A. Zadeh, 2011. "Generalized Theory of Uncertainty: Principal Concepts and Ideas," Palgrave Macmillan Books, in: Silva Marzetti Dall’Aste Brandolini & Roberto Scazzieri (ed.), Fundamental Uncertainty, chapter 6, pages 104-150, Palgrave Macmillan.
    23. Awasthi, Anjali & Govindan, Kannan & Gold, Stefan, 2018. "Multi-tier sustainable global supplier selection using a fuzzy AHP-VIKOR based approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 106-117.
    24. Xiangshuo He & Jian Zhang, 2018. "Supplier Selection Study under the Respective of Low-Carbon Supply Chain: A Hybrid Evaluation Model Based on FA-DEA-AHP," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(2), pages 1-17, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Almulhim, Tarifa & Barahona, Igor, 2023. "An extended picture fuzzy multicriteria group decision analysis with different weights: A case study of COVID-19 vaccine allocation," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    2. Esmaelnezhad, Danial & Taghizadeh-Yazdi, Mohammadreza & Amoozad Mahdiraji, Hannan & Vrontis, Demetris, 2023. "International strategic alliances for collaborative product Innovation: An agent-based scenario analysis in biopharmaceutical industry," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hua Shi & Mei-Yun Quan & Hu-Chen Liu & Chun-Yan Duan, 2018. "A Novel Integrated Approach for Green Supplier Selection with Interval-Valued Intuitionistic Uncertain Linguistic Information: A Case Study in the Agri-Food Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(3), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Mishra, Arunodaya Raj & Mardani, Abbas & Rani, Pratibha & Kamyab, Hesam & Alrasheedi, Melfi, 2021. "A new intuitionistic fuzzy combinative distance-based assessment framework to assess low-carbon sustainable suppliers in the maritime sector," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(C).
    3. Kannan Govindan & Aditi & Jyoti Dhingra Darbari & Arshia Kaul & PC Jha, 2021. "Structural model for analysis of key performance indicators for sustainable manufacturer–supplier collaboration: A grey‐decision‐making trial and evaluation laboratory‐based approach," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(4), pages 1702-1722, May.
    4. Patchara Phochanikorn & Chunqiao Tan, 2019. "An Integrated Multi-Criteria Decision-Making Model Based on Prospect Theory for Green Supplier Selection under Uncertain Environment: A Case Study of the Thailand Palm Oil Products Industry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-22, March.
    5. Davis-Sramek, Beth & Robinson, Jessica L. & Darby, Jessica L. & Thomas, Rodney W., 2020. "Exploring the differential roles of environmental and social sustainability in carrier selection decisions," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    6. Rui Guo & Zhenyong Wu, 2023. "Social sustainable supply chain performance assessment using hybrid fuzzy-AHP–DEMATEL–VIKOR: a case study in manufacturing enterprises," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(11), pages 12273-12301, November.
    7. Rajiv Kumar Sharma, 2022. "Examining interaction among supplier selection strategies in an outsourcing environment using ISM and fuzzy logic approach," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 13(5), pages 2175-2194, October.
    8. Alireza Arshadi Khamseh, 2021. "A Time-Dependent Sustainable–Flexible Supplier Selection Considering Uncertainty and TODIM Method in Iranian Dairy Industries," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 22(2), pages 113-126, June.
    9. Chong Li & He Huang & Ya Luo, 2022. "An Integrated Two-Dimension Linguistic Intuitionistic Fuzzy Decision-Making Approach for Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Supplier Selection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-24, September.
    10. Aly Owida & P.J. Byrne & Cathal Heavey & Paul Blake & Khaled S. El-Kilany, 2016. "A simulation based continuous improvement approach for manufacturing based field repair service contracting," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(21), pages 6458-6477, November.
    11. Devesh Kumar & Gunjan Soni & Rohit Joshi & Vipul Jain & Amrik Sohal, 2022. "Modelling supply chain viability during COVID-19 disruption: A case of an Indian automobile manufacturing supply chain," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 15(3), pages 1224-1240, December.
    12. Fatih Ecer, 2022. "Multi-criteria decision making for green supplier selection using interval type-2 fuzzy AHP: a case study of a home appliance manufacturer," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 22(1), pages 199-233, March.
    13. Ziquan Xiang & Muhammad Hamza Naseem & Jiaqi Yang, 2022. "Selection of Coal Transportation Company Based on Fuzzy SWARA-COPRAS Approach," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, January.
    14. Xiongyong Zhou & Zhiduan Xu, 2018. "An Integrated Sustainable Supplier Selection Approach Based on Hybrid Information Aggregation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-49, July.
    15. R. Sivaprakasam & V. Selladurai & P. Sasikumar, 2015. "Implementation of interpretive structural modelling methodology as a strategic decision making tool in a Green Supply Chain Context," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 233(1), pages 423-448, October.
    16. Dan-Ping Li & Li Xie & Peng-Fei Cheng & Xiang-Hong Zhou & Cheng-Xun Fu, 2021. "Green Supplier Selection Under Cloud Manufacturing Environment: A Hybrid MCDM Model," SAGE Open, , vol. 11(4), pages 21582440211, November.
    17. Akshay Hinduja & Manju Pandey, 2023. "Analysis and Comparison of State-of-the-Art Fuzzy Multi-criteria Decision-making Methods Under Different Levels of Uncertainty," Vision, , vol. 27(1), pages 93-109, February.
    18. Barak, Sasan & Javanmard, Shima, 2020. "Outsourcing modelling using a novel interval-valued fuzzy quantitative strategic planning matrix (QSPM) and multiple criteria decision-making (MCDMs)," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    19. Merve Er Kara & Seniye Ümit Oktay Fırat, 2018. "Supplier Risk Assessment Based on Best-Worst Method and K-Means Clustering: A Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-25, April.
    20. Mandic, Ksenija & Delibasic, Boris & Knezevic, Snezana & Benkovic, Sladjana, 2014. "Analysis of the financial parameters of Serbian banks through the application of the fuzzy AHP and TOPSIS methods," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 30-37.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:79:y:2022:i:c:s0038012121001348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.