IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v74y2021ics0038012119300692.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A data-based comparison of the five undesirable output disposability approaches in airline environmental efficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Cui, Qiang

Abstract

The carbon emissions of airlines are growing rapidly, so if we intend to evaluate the airlines’ environmental efficiency, carbon emissions should be a kind of undesirable output. Five disposability approaches for undesirable output have been proposed, but no data-based empirical study has been done to compare them. In this paper, we define Greenhouse gas emission as the undesirable output and select Number of Employees, Fleet Size, Sales Costs, and Aviation Kerosene as the inputs, the desirable outputs are Revenue Passenger Kilometers and Total Revenue. The data of 29 international airlines from 2008 to 2014 are applied to compare the disposability approaches in airline environmental efficiency. The main findings are: 1. By-production model has the best performance in distinguishing airline environmental efficiency. 2. Unified natural disposability & managerial disposability does well in deciding efficient airlines and in deciding the airlines with the lowest efficiency. 3. The undesirable output related indices have a more important role in the efficiency change of by-production model.

Suggested Citation

  • Cui, Qiang, 2021. "A data-based comparison of the five undesirable output disposability approaches in airline environmental efficiency," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:74:y:2021:i:c:s0038012119300692
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2020.100931
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012119300692
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2020.100931?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Ye & Wang, Yan-zhang & Cui, Qiang, 2015. "Evaluating airline efficiency: An application of Virtual Frontier Network SBM," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-17.
    2. Tavassoli, Mohammad & Faramarzi, Gholam Reza & Farzipoor Saen, Reza, 2014. "Efficiency and effectiveness in airline performance using a SBM-NDEA model in the presence of shared input," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(C), pages 146-153.
    3. William Cooper & Kyung Park & Jesus Pastor, 1999. "RAM: A Range Adjusted Measure of Inefficiency for Use with Additive Models, and Relations to Other Models and Measures in DEA," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 5-42, February.
    4. Cui, Qiang & Li, Ye, 2015. "Evaluating energy efficiency for airlines: An application of VFB-DEA," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 44, pages 34-41.
    5. Hampf, Benjamin & Rødseth, Kenneth Løvold, 2015. "Carbon dioxide emission standards for U.S. power plants: An efficiency analysis perspective," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 140-153.
    6. Färe, Rolf & Grosskopf, Shawna & Pasurka, Carl A., 2007. "Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(7), pages 1055-1066.
    7. Ila Alam & Robin Sickles, 1998. "The Relationship Between Stock Market Returns and Technical Efficiency Innovations: Evidence from the US Airline Industry," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 9(1), pages 35-51, January.
    8. Hampf, Benjamin & Rødseth, Kenneth Løvold, 2015. "Carbon dioxode emission standards for U.S. power plants: An efficiency analysis perspective," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 77009, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    9. Wu, Jie & Li, Mingjun & Zhu, Qingyuan & Zhou, Zhixiang & Liang, Liang, 2019. "Energy and environmental efficiency measurement of China's industrial sectors: A DEA model with non-homogeneous inputs and outputs," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 468-480.
    10. Rolf Färe & Shawna Grosskopf, 2003. "Nonparametric Productivity Analysis with Undesirable Outputs: Comment," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 85(4), pages 1070-1074.
    11. Ray, Subhash C & Mukherjee, Kankana, 1996. "Decomposition of the Fisher Ideal Index of Productivity: A Non-parametric Dual Analysis of US Airlines Data," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 106(439), pages 1659-1678, November.
    12. Qiang Cui & Ye Li, 2018. "Airline environmental efficiency measures considering materials balance principles: an application of a network range-adjusted measure with weak-G disposability," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 61(13), pages 2298-2318, November.
    13. Atakelty Hailu, 2003. "Nonparametric Productivity Analysis with Undesirable Outputs: Reply," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 85(4), pages 1075-1077.
    14. Cui, Qiang & Li, Ye, 2018. "Airline dynamic efficiency measures with a Dynamic RAM with unified natural & managerial disposability," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 534-546.
    15. Good, David H. & Roller, Lars-Hendrik & Sickles, Robin C., 1995. "Airline efficiency differences between Europe and the US: Implications for the pace of EC integration and domestic regulation," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 80(3), pages 508-518, February.
    16. Sueyoshi, Toshiyuki & Goto, Mika, 2012. "Weak and strong disposability vs. natural and managerial disposability in DEA environmental assessment: Comparison between Japanese electric power industry and manufacturing industries," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(3), pages 686-699.
    17. Fare, Rolf, et al, 1989. "Multilateral Productivity Comparisons When Some Outputs Are Undesirable: A Nonparametric Approach," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 71(1), pages 90-98, February.
    18. Atakelty Hailu & Terrence S. Veeman, 2001. "Non-parametric Productivity Analysis with Undesirable Outputs: An Application to the Canadian Pulp and Paper Industry," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 83(3), pages 605-616.
    19. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    20. Cui, Qiang & Lin, Jing-ling & Jin, Zi-yin, 2020. "Evaluating airline efficiency under “Carbon Neutral Growth from 2020” strategy through a Network Interval Slack-Based Measure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    21. Veronique Distexhe & Sergio Perelman, 1994. "Technical Efficiency and Productivity Growth in an Era of Deregulation: the Case of Airlines," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics (SJES), Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics (SSES), vol. 130(IV), pages 669-689, December.
    22. Cui, Qiang & Kuang, Hai-bo & Wu, Chun-you & Li, Ye, 2014. "The changing trend and influencing factors of energy efficiency: The case of nine countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 1026-1034.
    23. Cui, Qiang & Li, Ye & Yu, Chen-lu & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2016. "Evaluating energy efficiency for airlines: An application of Virtual Frontier Dynamic Slacks Based Measure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 1231-1240.
    24. Cui, Qiang & Wei, Yi-Ming & Li, Ye, 2016. "Exploring the impacts of the EU ETS emission limits on airline performance via the Dynamic Environmental DEA approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 984-994.
    25. Li, Ye & Wang, Yan-zhang & Cui, Qiang, 2016. "Has airline efficiency affected by the inclusion of aviation into European Union Emission Trading Scheme? Evidences from 22 airlines during 2008–2012," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 8-22.
    26. Yang, Hongliang & Pollitt, Michael, 2010. "The necessity of distinguishing weak and strong disposability among undesirable outputs in DEA: Environmental performance of Chinese coal-fired power plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(8), pages 4440-4444, August.
    27. Sebastián Lozano & Ester Gutiérrez, 2014. "A slacks-based network DEA efficiency analysis of European airlines," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(7), pages 623-637, October.
    28. Cui, Qiang & Li, Ye, 2017. "Airline efficiency measures under CNG2020 strategy: An application of a Dynamic By-production model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 130-143.
    29. Cui, Qiang & Kuang, Hai-bo & Wu, Chun-you & Li, Ye, 2013. "Dynamic formation mechanism of airport competitiveness: The case of China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 10-18.
    30. Jeanneaux, Philippe & Latruffe, Laure, 2016. "Modelling pollution-generating technologies in performance benchmarking: Recent developments, limits and future prospects in the nonparametric frameworkAuthor-Name: Dakpo, K. Hervé," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(2), pages 347-359.
    31. Murty, Sushama & Robert Russell, R. & Levkoff, Steven B., 2012. "On modeling pollution-generating technologies," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 64(1), pages 117-135.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liu, Hongwei & Shao, Liangyu & Min, Jie & Ji, Xiang, 2024. "Regional differences and determinants of environmental efficiency in China's road transportation industry," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 931-946.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cui, Qiang & Li, Ye, 2018. "Airline dynamic efficiency measures with a Dynamic RAM with unified natural & managerial disposability," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 534-546.
    2. Li, Ye & Cui, Qiang, 2017. "Carbon neutral growth from 2020 strategy and airline environmental inefficiency: A Network Range Adjusted Environmental Data Envelopment Analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 13-24.
    3. Cui, Qiang & Li, Ye, 2017. "Airline efficiency measures under CNG2020 strategy: An application of a Dynamic By-production model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 130-143.
    4. Li, Ye & Wang, Yan-zhang & Cui, Qiang, 2016. "Has airline efficiency affected by the inclusion of aviation into European Union Emission Trading Scheme? Evidences from 22 airlines during 2008–2012," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 8-22.
    5. Cui, Qiang & Wei, Yi-Ming & Li, Ye, 2016. "Exploring the impacts of the EU ETS emission limits on airline performance via the Dynamic Environmental DEA approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C), pages 984-994.
    6. Cui, Qiang & Li, Ye, 2020. "A cross efficiency distinguishing method to explore the cooperation degree in dynamic airline environmental efficiency," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 31-43.
    7. Ye Li & Qiang Cui, 2017. "Airline energy efficiency measures using the Virtual Frontier Network RAM with weak disposability," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(4), pages 479-504, May.
    8. Cui, Qiang & Jin, Zi-yin, 2020. "Airline environmental efficiency measures considering negative data: An application of a modified network Modified Slacks-based measure model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    9. Cui, Qiang & Li, Ye, 2017. "Airline efficiency measures using a Dynamic Epsilon-Based Measure model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 121-134.
    10. Cui, Qiang & Li, Ye & Wei, Yi-Ming, 2017. "Exploring the impacts of EU ETS on the pollution abatement costs of European airlines: An application of Network Environmental Production Function," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 131-142.
    11. Seufert, Juergen Heinz & Arjomandi, Amir & Dakpo, K. Hervé, 2017. "Evaluating airline operational performance: A Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indicator," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 52-68.
    12. Li, Ye & Cui, Qiang, 2018. "Investigating the role of cooperation in the GHG abatement costs of airlines under CNG2020 strategy via a DEA cross PAC model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 725-736.
    13. Cui, Qiang, 2019. "Investigating the airlines emission reduction through carbon trading under CNG2020 strategy via a Network Weak Disposability DEA," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 763-771.
    14. Cui, Qiang & Li, Ye & Lin, Jing-ling, 2018. "Pollution abatement costs change decomposition for airlines: An analysis from a dynamic perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 96-107.
    15. Cui, Qiang & Lin, Jing-ling & Jin, Zi-yin, 2020. "Evaluating airline efficiency under “Carbon Neutral Growth from 2020” strategy through a Network Interval Slack-Based Measure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    16. Xu, Xin & Cui, Qiang, 2017. "Evaluating airline energy efficiency: An integrated approach with Network Epsilon-based Measure and Network Slacks-based Measure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 274-286.
    17. Li, Ye & Wang, Yan-zhang & Cui, Qiang, 2015. "Evaluating airline efficiency: An application of Virtual Frontier Network SBM," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 1-17.
    18. Chu, Junfei & Shao, Caifeng & Emrouznejad, Ali & Wu, Jie & Yuan, Zhe, 2021. "Performance evaluation of organizations considering economic incentives for emission reduction: A carbon emission permit trading approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    19. Arjomandi, Amir & Dakpo, K. Hervé & Seufert, Juergen Heinz, 2018. "Have Asian airlines caught up with European Airlines? A by-production efficiency analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 389-403.
    20. Cui, Qiang & Arjomandi, Amir, 2021. "Airline energy efficiency measures based on an epsilon-based Range-Adjusted Measure model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:74:y:2021:i:c:s0038012119300692. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.