IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceps/v96y2024ics0038012124002817.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Technical efficiency and managerial ability in two-stage production processes with undesirable products: A case on Asian banks

Author

Listed:
  • Amirteimoori, Alireza
  • Kou, Gang

Abstract

Performance improvement and managerial ability estimation using benchmarking tools and data envelopment analysis (DEA) in banking and financial sectors have attracted considerable attention among researchers and bank managers. Although there are many efforts in two-stage DEA in banks, few studies have been conducted to measure managerial ability and technical efficiency of two-stage DEA in the banking sector. This contribution proposes a two-stage DEA procedure to estimate technical efficiency and managerial ability in the banking sector in six Asian countries. The empirical results obtained for selected Asian banks revealed that variables total capital adequacy ratio, total assets and number of branches have a positive impact on the efficiency of the deposit gathering section. Moreover, we observed that the number of ATMs has a negative impact on the efficiency of the sales and services section. Another finding is that in all these six countries, the sales and service section has performed better than the deposit gathering section.

Suggested Citation

  • Amirteimoori, Alireza & Kou, Gang, 2024. "Technical efficiency and managerial ability in two-stage production processes with undesirable products: A case on Asian banks," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:96:y:2024:i:c:s0038012124002817
    DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2024.102081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012124002817
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.seps.2024.102081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceps:v:96:y:2024:i:c:s0038012124002817. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/seps .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.