IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/soceco/v26y1997i3p243-260.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A socio-economic perspective on gender bias in technology

Author

Listed:
  • Kilbourne, William
  • Weeks, Susan

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Kilbourne, William & Weeks, Susan, 1997. "A socio-economic perspective on gender bias in technology," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 26(3), pages 243-260.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:soceco:v:26:y:1997:i:3:p:243-260
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6W5H-45FY3J6-2R/2/2d9546fd10974d688ac8fd7d0842459d
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Stern, Paul C., 1993. "The socio-economic perspective and its institutional prospects," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 1-11.
    2. Hirschman, Elizabeth C, 1993. "Ideology in Consumer Research, 1980 and 1990: A Marxist and Feminist Critique," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 19(4), pages 537-555, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jacob Peng & Ira Abdullah, 2018. "Building a market simulation to teach business process analysis: effects of realism on engaged learning," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 27(2), pages 208-222, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adhia, Nimish, 2013. "The role of ideological change in India's economic liberalization," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 103-111.
    2. Cristina GALALAE & Alexandru VOICU, 2013. "Consumer Behaviour Research: Jacquard Weaving in the Social Sciences," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 1(2), pages 277-292, August.
    3. Susan Meriläinen & Johanna Moisander & Sinikka Pesonen, 2000. "The masculine mindset of environmental management and green marketing," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 9(3), pages 151-162, May.
    4. Ksenia Silchenko, 2018. "The other "meta" of meta-analysis: Qualitative and text-based approaches to "analysis of analyses" in marketing," MERCATI & COMPETITIVIT?, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2018(4), pages 27-45.
    5. Pecot, Fabien & Vasilopoulou, Sofia & Cavallaro, Matteo, 2021. "How political ideology drives anti-consumption manifestations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 61-69.
    6. Rindfleisch, Aric, 1996. "Marketing as warfare: Reassessing a dominant metaphor," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 39(5), pages 3-10.
    7. Muhammad Waqas & Zalfa Laili Hamzah & Noor Akma Mohd Salleh, 2022. "Branded content experience in social media settings: a consumer culture theory perspective," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 29(2), pages 225-240, March.
    8. Ranjitha G.P. & Anandakuttan B. Unnithan, 2018. "Self and Identity of Being an Ideal Woman: An Exploratory Qualitative Study," IIM Kozhikode Society & Management Review, , vol. 7(1), pages 33-44, January.
    9. Haseeb Shabbir & Michael R. Hyman & Dianne Dean & Stephan Dahl, 2020. "‘Freedom Through Marketing’ Is Not Doublespeak," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 164(2), pages 227-241, June.
    10. Wallis, Joe, 2002. "Drawing on revisionist economics to explain the inspirational dimension of leadership," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 31(1), pages 59-74.
    11. Bowles, Douglas H. & Sturgeon, James I. & Ardebili, Morteza H. & Pinkham, Kelly D. & Washer, Wayne D. & Jumara, John J. & Brazelton, W. Robert & Erickson, Kenneth C. & A. Townsend, Jules & Berkshire, , 1999. "Interdisciplinary social science, global social theory, and socio-economics: a report on the UMKC Symposium at the Vienna Conference," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 28(4), pages 387-427.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:soceco:v:26:y:1997:i:3:p:243-260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620175 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.