IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/scaman/v28y2012i3p234-241.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

On life, death and radical critique: A non-survival guide to the Brave New Higher Education for the intellectually pregnant

Author

Listed:
  • Bristow, Alexandra

Abstract

This paper joins the call to arms against the domestication of critique in organisation studies. It argues that we have become too pre-occupied with our professional survival to stand firm against the normalising pressure of the new higher education and its publish-or-perish machinery. We trade away too much radicalism in exchange for legitimacy, which results in widely accepted but toothless forms of critique. The paper draws on two contrasting metaphors of Huxley's Brave New World and intellectual pregnancy to illustrate some of the challenges faced by early-career academics entering the world of the Brave New Higher Education as academic ‘savages’. It discusses the almost imperceptible socialisation of the savage into the ‘rationalised myths’ of the brave new world to the point that alternatives become literally unthinkable. The paper suggests that we can fight this slippage and the associated domestication of critique by giving up our obsession with survival and by remembering/envisioning alternative realities, such as that of intellectual pregnancy deriving from the fragile idealism of the savage's doctoral world.

Suggested Citation

  • Bristow, Alexandra, 2012. "On life, death and radical critique: A non-survival guide to the Brave New Higher Education for the intellectually pregnant," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(3), pages 234-241.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:28:y:2012:i:3:p:234-241
    DOI: 10.1016/j.scaman.2012.05.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522112000802
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.scaman.2012.05.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clarke, Caroline & Knights, David & Jarvis, Carol, 2012. "A Labour of Love? Academics in Business Schools," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 5-15.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tourish, Dennis & Willmott, Hugh, 2015. "In Defiance of Folly: Journal rankings, mindless measures and the ABS Guide," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 37-46.
    2. King, Daniel, 2015. "The possibilities and perils of critical performativity: Learning from four case studies," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(2), pages 255-265.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sandrine Frémeaux & Thibaut Bardon & Clara Letierce, 2020. "How To Be a ‘Wise’ Researcher: Learning from the Aristotelian Approach to Practical Wisdom," Post-Print hal-03232780, HAL.
    2. Senia Kalfa & Adrian Wilkinson & Paul J Gollan, 2018. "The Academic Game: Compliance and Resistance in Universities," Work, Employment & Society, British Sociological Association, vol. 32(2), pages 274-291, April.
    3. Shubo Liu & Qiuli Huang & Mengna Lv, 2024. "From vocation to profession: multiple identities of Chinese management academics," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-17, December.
    4. Gokce Basbug & Ayn Cavicchi & Susan S. Silbey, 2023. "Rank Has Its Privileges: Explaining Why Laboratory Safety Is a Persistent Challenge," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 184(3), pages 571-587, May.
    5. Mohammed Muneerali Thottoli & Md. Aminul Islam & Farid Ahammad Sobhani & Shafiqur Rahman & Md. Sharif Hassan, 2022. "Auditing and Sustainability Accounting: A Global Examination Using the Scopus Database," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Byrne Orla & MacDonagh Joe, 2017. "What’s love got to do with it? Employee engagement amongst higher education workers," The Irish Journal of Management, Sciendo, vol. 36(3), pages 189-205.
    7. Ainsworth, Susan & Grant, David, 2012. "Revitalizing scholarship in identity studies," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 60-62.
    8. Herschberg, Channah & Benschop, Yvonne & van den Brink, Marieke, 2018. "Precarious postdocs: A comparative study on recruitment and selection of early-career researchers," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 34(4), pages 303-310.
    9. McInnes, Peter & Corlett, Sandra, 2012. "Conversational identity work in everyday interaction," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 27-38.
    10. Sandrine Frémeaux & Thibaut Bardon & Clara Letierce, 2021. "How To Be a ‘Wise’ Researcher: Learning from the Aristotelian Approach to Practical Wisdom," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(4), pages 667-681, July.
    11. Thomas, Rhodri & Ormerod, Neil, 2017. "The (almost) imperceptible impact of tourism research on policy and practice," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 379-389.
    12. Ybema, Sierk & Vroemisse, Marlous & van Marrewijk, Alfons, 2012. "Constructing identity by deconstructing differences: Building partnerships across cultural and hierarchical divides," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 48-59.
    13. Grisard, Claudine, 2023. "Time, workload model and the entrepreneurial construction of the neoliberal academic," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    14. Adriana Gil-Juárez, 2019. "A Tale of Two Subjectivities: An Academic Life Story," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-18, September.
    15. Daniela Pianezzi & Hanne Nørreklit & Lino Cinquini, 2020. "Academia After Virtue? An Inquiry into the Moral Character(s) of Academics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 571-588, December.
    16. Mallett, Oliver & Wapshott, Robert, 2012. "Mediating ambiguity: Narrative identity and knowledge workers," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 28(1), pages 16-26.
    17. Becker, Albrecht & Lukka, Kari, 2023. "Instrumentalism and the publish-or-perish regime," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    18. Brooks, Chris & Schopohl, Lisa & Walker, James T., 2023. "Comparing perceptions of the impact of journal rankings between fields," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:28:y:2012:i:3:p:234-241. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/872/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.