IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/scaman/v17y2001i1p109-131.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensemaking in organisations -- towards a conceptual framework for understanding strategic change

Author

Listed:
  • Ericson, Thomas

Abstract

When an organisation is facing dramatic change, shared and individual meanings are challenged and exposed to reconstruction. Thus, if we are to understand organisational change it is necessary to understand the meanings that prevail among the organisational members, as well as the processes whereby these meanings change and coincide. This paper develops a sensemaking perspective in order to generate a conceptual framework for increasing our understanding of strategic change in organisations. Four ideal types of meaning constitute the core of this framework. With the help of these ideal types, various meaning statuses that may be present within an organisation are described. In order to grasp the transformations from one ideal type of meaning to another, four processes of transformation are identified. A strategic change process in a university hospital is analysed. In this change process different ideal types of meaning are identified. A process of a transformation from one ideal type to another, driven by strong and powerful symbolic processes, is also identified.

Suggested Citation

  • Ericson, Thomas, 2001. "Sensemaking in organisations -- towards a conceptual framework for understanding strategic change," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 17(1), pages 109-131, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:17:y:2001:i:1:p:109-131
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S095652210000035X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kristiansen, Margrethe & Obstfelder, Aud & Lotherington, Ann Therese, 2015. "Nurses’ sensemaking of contradicting logics: An underexplored aspect of organisational work in nursing homes," Scandinavian Journal of Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(3), pages 330-337.
    2. Paolo Federighi, 2016. "L?azione formativa nelle organizzazioni," QUADERNI DI ECONOMIA DEL LAVORO, FrancoAngeli Editore, vol. 2016(105), pages 115-133.
    3. Simone Zolingen & Hakan Honders, 2010. "Metaphors and the Application of a Corporate Code of Ethics," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 92(3), pages 385-400, March.
    4. Hong, Paul & Doll, William J. & Revilla, Elena & Nahm, Abraham Y., 2011. "Knowledge sharing and strategic fit in integrated product development proejcts: An empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 132(2), pages 186-196, August.
    5. Upham, Paul & Klapper, Rita & Carney, Sebastian, 2016. "Participatory energy scenario development as dramatic scripting: A structural narrative analysis," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 47-56.
    6. Albers, Sascha & Heuermann, Caroline, 2012. "Competitive dynamics across industries: An analysis of inter-industry competition in German passenger transportation," Working Paper Series 109, University of Cologne, Department of Business Policy and Logistics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:scaman:v:17:y:2001:i:1:p:109-131. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/872/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.