IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/riibaf/v70y2024ipbs0275531924001442.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Do clean and dirty cryptocurrencies connect financial assets differently? The perspective of market inefficiency

Author

Listed:
  • Duan, Kun
  • Zhang, Liya
  • Urquhart, Andrew
  • Yao, Kai
  • Peng, Long

Abstract

Empirical violation of the efficient market hypothesis implies biased inferences drawn directly by price-related information, calling for accommodating the role of informational inefficiency in connecting related markets. This paper studies the cross-market linkage of the inefficiency degree of clean and dirty cryptocurrencies with traditional and green assets under a full distributional framework. By using a quantile-on-quantile method and an international dataset, our findings support the presence of market inefficiency for both cryptocurrencies and financial assets, which varies our time. The linkage between clean and dirty cryptocurrencies, as well as traditional and green financial assets is found to be generally positive but fluctuates at extreme market conditions, being led by the presence of cross-border arbitrage between cryptocurrency markets and the financial system.

Suggested Citation

  • Duan, Kun & Zhang, Liya & Urquhart, Andrew & Yao, Kai & Peng, Long, 2024. "Do clean and dirty cryptocurrencies connect financial assets differently? The perspective of market inefficiency," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 70(PB).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:70:y:2024:i:pb:s0275531924001442
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102351
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531924001442
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ribaf.2024.102351?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:70:y:2024:i:pb:s0275531924001442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ribaf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.