IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/riibaf/v67y2024ipbs0275531923002477.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of business to business e-commerce platform-governance mechanisms on seller firms’ performance

Author

Listed:
  • Li, Wenjie
  • Sun, Chaojing
  • Li, Yan
  • Ertz, Myriam

Abstract

The Chinese government’s quinquennial “Internet Plus” plan encompasses big data, cloud computing, and the Internet of Things for a broad range of industries. While the electronic commerce platforms that had segmented the business-to-business (B2B) market jumped at the opportunity to facilitate user firms’ performance, this coerced digitalization also provided sellers with a firm basis for becoming solely profit-seeking and engaging in unethical behavior. Seller firms’ core position is that a B2B e-commerce platform must supervise and manage seller firms to improve their performance. Drawing on symbiosis theory, this study proposes that platform-governance mechanisms (monitoring and community-building) enhance seller firms’ sense of belonging, thus improving relationship satisfaction and increasing seller firms’ performance. This study designs effective governance mechanisms for the B2B e-commerce platform according to its new roles. In addition to its economic role, the B2B e-commerce platform should assume “coordinator” and “supervisor” roles.

Suggested Citation

  • Li, Wenjie & Sun, Chaojing & Li, Yan & Ertz, Myriam, 2024. "Effects of business to business e-commerce platform-governance mechanisms on seller firms’ performance," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(PB).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:67:y:2024:i:pb:s0275531923002477
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.102121
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0275531923002477
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ribaf.2023.102121?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xu, Lina & Meng, Zhiqing, 2024. "The role of membership fees in online retail market competition," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 67(PA).
    2. Pauline Patnasingam & David Gefen & Paul A. Pavlou, 2005. "The Role of Facilitating Conditions and Institutional Trust in Electronic Marketplaces," Journal of Electronic Commerce in Organizations (JECO), IGI Global, vol. 3(3), pages 69-82, July.
    3. Brown, James R. & Cobb, Anthony T. & Lusch, Robert F., 2006. "The roles played by interorganizational contracts and justice in marketing channel relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 59(2), pages 166-175, February.
    4. R. H. Coase, 2013. "The Problem of Social Cost," Journal of Law and Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 56(4), pages 837-877.
    5. Sun, Xinbo & Zhang, Qingqiang, 2021. "Building digital incentives for digital customer orientation in platform ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 555-566.
    6. HUO, Peng & WANG, Luxin, 2022. "Digital economy and business investment efficiency: Inhibiting or facilitating?," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    7. Zhiwen Li & Thierry Penard, 2014. "The Role of Quantitative and Qualitative Network Effects in B2B Platform Competition," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 35(1), pages 1-19, January.
    8. Xie, Nan & Xu, Qifa & Jiang, Cuixia & Fu, Hong, 2023. "Social media, investor-company interaction and insider trading profitability: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    9. R. Chumpitaz & N. Paparoidamis, 2007. "Service quality, relationship satisfaction, trust, commitment, and business-to-business loyalty," Post-Print hal-00199063, HAL.
    10. Edwards, John & Miles, Morgan P. & D'Alessandro, Steven & Frost, Mark, 2022. "Linking B2B sales performance to entrepreneurial self-efficacy, entrepreneurial selling actions," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 585-593.
    11. Chung, Henry F.L. & Kingshott, Russel P.J. & MacDonald, Robyn V.G. & Putranta, Martinus Parnawa, 2021. "Dynamism and B2B firm performance: The dark and bright contingent role of B2B relationships," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 250-259.
    12. Mora Cortez, Roberto & Johnston, Wesley J. & Gopalakrishna, Srinath, 2022. "Driving participation and investment in B2B trade shows: The organizer view," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 1092-1105.
    13. John Hulland, 1999. "Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 20(2), pages 195-204, February.
    14. Carmelo Cennamo & Juan Santaló, 2019. "Generativity Tension and Value Creation in Platform Ecosystems," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 617-641, May.
    15. de Reuver, Mark & Sørensen, Carsten & Basole, Rahul C., 2018. "The digital platform: a research agenda," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 80669, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    16. Feng Zhu & Marco Iansiti, 2012. "Entry into platform‐based markets," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(1), pages 88-106, January.
    17. Zhou, Kevin Zheng & Li, Caroline Bingxin, 2010. "How strategic orientations influence the building of dynamic capability in emerging economies," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 63(3), pages 224-231, March.
    18. Andrei Hagiu & Julian Wright, 2015. "Marketplace or Reseller?," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 61(1), pages 184-203, January.
    19. Liu, Guangqiang & Wang, Shenghua, 2023. "Digital transformation and trade credit provision: Evidence from China," Research in International Business and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    20. Denise E Gengatharen & Craig Standing, 2005. "A framework to assess the factors affecting success or failure of the implementation of government-supported regional e-marketplaces for SMEs," European Journal of Information Systems, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 14(4), pages 417-433, December.
    21. Johnson, Michael D. & Fornell, Claes, 1991. "A framework for comparing customer satisfaction across individuals and product categories," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 12(2), pages 267-286, June.
    22. Nakos, George & Brouthers, Keith D., 2008. "International alliance commitment and performance of small and medium-size enterprises: The mediating role of process control," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 14(2), pages 124-137, June.
    23. Claudio Panico & Carmelo Cennamo, 2022. "User preferences and strategic interactions in platform ecosystems," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(3), pages 507-529, March.
    24. Majken Schultz & Tor Hernes, 2013. "A Temporal Perspective on Organizational Identity," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 24(1), pages 1-21, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peng, Hui & Lu, Yaobin & Gupta, Sumeet, 2023. "Promoting value emergence through digital platform ecosystems: Perspectives on resource integration in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    2. Dai, Guangsong & Zhang, Lanxia & Zhang, Qingqiang & Mao, Mengyu, 2024. "Navigating tensions between value creation and capture in ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    3. Brea, Edgar, 2023. "A framework for mapping actor roles and their innovation potential in digital ecosystems," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    4. Van Dyck, Marc & Lüttgens, Dirk & Diener, Kathleen & Piller, Frank & Pollok, Patrick, 2024. "From product to platform: How incumbents' assumptions and choices shape their platform strategy," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 53(1).
    5. Jan Frederic Nerbel & Markus Kreutzer, 2023. "Digital platform ecosystems in flux: From proprietary digital platforms to wide-spanning ecosystems," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 33(1), pages 1-20, December.
    6. Gomes, Leonardo Augusto de Vasconcelos & Flechas, Ximena Alejandra & Facin, Ana Lucia Figueiredo & Borini, Felipe Mendes, 2021. "Ecosystem management: Past achievements and future promises," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 171(C).
    7. Karl Taeuscher, 2019. "Uncertainty kills the long tail: demand concentration in peer-to-peer marketplaces," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 29(4), pages 649-660, December.
    8. Munawwer Husain, 2015. "The Role of Brand Loyalty: The Case Study of Telekom Malaysia," International Review of Management and Marketing, Econjournals, vol. 5(3), pages 173-179.
    9. Inoue, Yuki, 2021. "Indirect innovation management by platform ecosystem governance and positioning: Toward collective ambidexterity in the ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    10. Bag, Surajit & Sabbir Rahman, Muhammad & Choi, Tsan-Ming & Srivastava, Gautam & Kilbourn, Peter & Pisa, Noleen, 2023. "How COVID-19 pandemic has shaped buyer-supplier relationships in engineering companies with ethical perception considerations: A multi-methodological study," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    11. Castell, Carolin & Kiefer, Jasmin & Schubach, Sebastian & Schumann, Jan H. & Graf-Vlachy, Lorenz & König, Andreas, 2023. "Integrating digital platform dynamics into customer orientation research: A systematic review and research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 163(C).
    12. Laurin Arnold & Jan Jöhnk & Florian Vogt & Nils Urbach, 2022. "IIoT platforms’ architectural features – a taxonomy and five prevalent archetypes," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(2), pages 927-944, June.
    13. Jørgen Veisdal, 2020. "The dynamics of entry for digital platforms in two-sided markets: a multi-case study," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 30(3), pages 539-556, September.
    14. Martin Engert & Julia Evers & Andreas Hein & Helmut Krcmar, 2022. "The Engagement of Complementors and the Role of Platform Boundary Resources in e-Commerce Platform Ecosystems," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 2007-2025, December.
    15. Milan Miric & Hakan Ozalp & Erdem Dogukan Yilmaz, 2023. "Trade‐offs to using standardized tools: Innovation enablers or creativity constraints?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 44(4), pages 909-942, April.
    16. Saadatmand, Fatemeh & Lindgren, Rikard & Schultze, Ulrike, 2019. "Configurations of platform organizations: Implications for complementor engagement," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 48(8), pages 1-1.
    17. Palmer, Mark & Toral, Inci & Truong, Yann & Lowe, Fiona, 2022. "Institutional pioneers and articulation work in digital platform infrastructure-building," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 930-945.
    18. Muhammed S. Alnsour, 2018. "Online relationship marketing for banks in face-to-face economies," Journal of Marketing Analytics, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 6(3), pages 105-116, September.
    19. Daniel Fürstenau & Abayomi Baiyere & Kai Schewina & Matthias Schulte-Althoff & Hannes Rothe, 2023. "Extended Generativity Theory on Digital Platforms," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 34(4), pages 1686-1710, December.
    20. Täuscher, Karl & Laudien, Sven M., 2018. "Understanding platform business models: A mixed methods study of marketplaces," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(3), pages 319-329.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Business to business platform; Community building; Governance mechanism; Monitoring; Symbiosis theory;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • D21 - Microeconomics - - Production and Organizations - - - Firm Behavior: Theory
    • G3 - Financial Economics - - Corporate Finance and Governance
    • L2 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior
    • L25 - Industrial Organization - - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior - - - Firm Performance
    • M1 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:riibaf:v:67:y:2024:i:pb:s0275531923002477. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ribaf .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.