IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v94y2024ics1059056024004039.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investors’ willingness to use robo-advisors: Extrapolating influencing factors based on the fiduciary duty of investment advisors

Author

Listed:
  • Luo, Haohan
  • Liu, Xin
  • Lv, Xingyang
  • Hu, Yubei
  • Ahmad, Ali J.

Abstract

Robo-advisors are increasingly seen as a solution for the growing demand for timely and actionable financial advice. However, systematic barriers to their deployment and use persist. Understanding the factors that influence investors' willingness to consult with robo-advisors is key to their wide-scale adoption. This research aims to isolate the factors influencing the willingness to adopt robo-advisors by investment advisory services. We focus on three adoption drivers: (1) performance of robo-advisors, (2) human-computer interaction, and (3) the reputation of software suppliers. Results indicate that ‘performance efficacy’, ‘perceived ease of use’, ‘customer education’, and ‘corporate reputation’ positively influence the perceived value, leading to higher adoption intention. Additionally, ‘performance efficacy’, ‘perceived privacy protection’ and ‘corporate reputation’ positively contributes to the building of trust, which in turn leads to higher adoption intention and asset allocation ratio. We found that low-experience investors were “value-driven”, while highly experienced investors were “trust-driven” when it came to adoption intent. The research highlights the potential of artificial intelligence-based applications for user behavior research and suggests design considerations for robo-advisor developers to influence positive adoption in financial advisory services.

Suggested Citation

  • Luo, Haohan & Liu, Xin & Lv, Xingyang & Hu, Yubei & Ahmad, Ali J., 2024. "Investors’ willingness to use robo-advisors: Extrapolating influencing factors based on the fiduciary duty of investment advisors," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:94:y:2024:i:c:s1059056024004039
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2024.103411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056024004039
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103411?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:94:y:2024:i:c:s1059056024004039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.