IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v94y2024ics1059056024004039.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investors’ willingness to use robo-advisors: Extrapolating influencing factors based on the fiduciary duty of investment advisors

Author

Listed:
  • Luo, Haohan
  • Liu, Xin
  • Lv, Xingyang
  • Hu, Yubei
  • Ahmad, Ali J.

Abstract

Robo-advisors are increasingly seen as a solution for the growing demand for timely and actionable financial advice. However, systematic barriers to their deployment and use persist. Understanding the factors that influence investors' willingness to consult with robo-advisors is key to their wide-scale adoption. This research aims to isolate the factors influencing the willingness to adopt robo-advisors by investment advisory services. We focus on three adoption drivers: (1) performance of robo-advisors, (2) human-computer interaction, and (3) the reputation of software suppliers. Results indicate that ‘performance efficacy’, ‘perceived ease of use’, ‘customer education’, and ‘corporate reputation’ positively influence the perceived value, leading to higher adoption intention. Additionally, ‘performance efficacy’, ‘perceived privacy protection’ and ‘corporate reputation’ positively contributes to the building of trust, which in turn leads to higher adoption intention and asset allocation ratio. We found that low-experience investors were “value-driven”, while highly experienced investors were “trust-driven” when it came to adoption intent. The research highlights the potential of artificial intelligence-based applications for user behavior research and suggests design considerations for robo-advisor developers to influence positive adoption in financial advisory services.

Suggested Citation

  • Luo, Haohan & Liu, Xin & Lv, Xingyang & Hu, Yubei & Ahmad, Ali J., 2024. "Investors’ willingness to use robo-advisors: Extrapolating influencing factors based on the fiduciary duty of investment advisors," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:94:y:2024:i:c:s1059056024004039
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2024.103411
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056024004039
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103411?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Humoud Alsabah & Agostino Capponi & Octavio Ruiz Lacedelli & Matt Stern, 2021. "Robo-Advising: Learning Investors’ Risk Preferences via Portfolio Choices [Mean-variance versus Full-scale Optimisation: In and out of Sample]," Journal of Financial Econometrics, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(2), pages 369-392.
    2. Kar Yan Tam & Shuk Ying Ho, 2005. "Web Personalization as a Persuasion Strategy: An Elaboration Likelihood Model Perspective," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 16(3), pages 271-291, September.
    3. Florian Glaser & Zwetelina Iliewa & Dominik Jung & Martin Weber, 2019. "Towards Designing Robo-advisors for Unexperienced Investors with Experience Sampling of Time-Series Data," Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organization, in: Fred D. Davis & René Riedl & Jan vom Brocke & Pierre-Majorique Léger & Adriane B. Randolph (ed.), Information Systems and Neuroscience, pages 133-138, Springer.
    4. Fred D. Davis & Richard P. Bagozzi & Paul R. Warshaw, 1989. "User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 35(8), pages 982-1003, August.
    5. Cardillo, Giovanni & Chiappini, Helen, 2024. "Robo-advisors: A systematic literature review," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).
    6. H. Lawrence Wilsey, 1949. "The Investment Advisers Act Of 1940," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 4(4), pages 286-297, December.
    7. Amit Seru & Tyler Shumway & Noah Stoffman, 2010. "Learning by Trading," The Review of Financial Studies, Society for Financial Studies, vol. 23(2), pages 705-739, February.
    8. Oehler, Andreas & Horn, Matthias, 2024. "Does ChatGPT provide better advice than robo-advisors?," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    9. Peter Heinrich & Gerhard Schwabe, 2018. "Facilitating Informed Decision-Making in Financial Service Encounters," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 60(4), pages 317-329, August.
    10. Wang, Haijun & Mao, Kunyuan & Wu, Wanting & Luo, Haohan, 2023. "Fintech inputs, non-performing loans risk reduction and bank performance improvement," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 90(C).
    11. Baker, T. & Dellaert, B.G.C., 2017. "Regulating Robo Advice across the Financial Services Industry," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2017-004-MKT, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    12. Luo, Haohan & Wang, Haijun & Wu, Ying, 2024. "Digital financial inclusion and tourism development," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 207-219.
    13. Brenner, Lukas & Meyll, Tobias, 2020. "Robo-advisors: A substitute for human financial advice?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 25(C).
    14. Gursoy, Dogan & Chi, Oscar Hengxuan & Lu, Lu & Nunkoo, Robin, 2019. "Consumers acceptance of artificially intelligent (AI) device use in service delivery," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 157-169.
    15. Dominik Jung & Verena Dorner & Christof Weinhardt & Hakan Pusmaz, 2018. "Designing a robo-advisor for risk-averse, low-budget consumers," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(3), pages 367-380, August.
    16. Cubric, Marija, 2020. "Drivers, barriers and social considerations for AI adoption in business and management: A tertiary study," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Cardillo, Giovanni & Chiappini, Helen, 2024. "Robo-advisors: A systematic literature review," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 62(PA).
    2. Nourallah, Mustafa, 2023. "One size does not fit all: Young retail investors’ initial trust in financial robo-advisors," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    3. Bai, Zefeng, 2021. "Does robo-advisory help reduce the likelihood of carrying a credit card debt? Evidence from an instrumental variable approach," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 29(C).
    4. Song, Christina Soyoung & Kim, Youn-Kyung, 2022. "The role of the human-robot interaction in consumers’ acceptance of humanoid retail service robots," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 489-503.
    5. McLean, Graeme & Osei-Frimpong, Kofi & Al-Nabhani, Khalid & Marriott, Hannah, 2020. "Examining consumer attitudes towards retailers' m-commerce mobile applications – An initial adoption vs. continuous use perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 139-157.
    6. Cheng-Feng Cheng & Chien-Che Huang & Ming-Chang Lin & Ta-Cheng Chen, 2023. "Exploring Effectiveness of Relationship Marketing on Artificial Intelligence Adopting Intention," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    7. Janotta, Frederica & Hogreve, Jens, 2024. "Ready for take-off? The dual role of affective and cognitive evaluations in the adoption of Urban Air Mobility services," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    8. Bosse, Douglas & Thompson, Steven & Ekman, Peter, 2023. "In consilium apparatus: Artificial intelligence, stakeholder reciprocity, and firm performance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 155(PA).
    9. Pelau Corina & Barbul Maria & Bojescu Irina, 2022. "A conceptual comparative approach on personal AI assistants and external service robots," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 1466-1474, August.
    10. Zhu, Hui & Vigren, Olli & Söderberg, Inga-Lill, 2024. "Implementing artificial intelligence empowered financial advisory services: A literature review and critical research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    11. Wenjia Li & Huangyi Ding & Jingjing Gui & Qinghe Tang, 2024. "Patient acceptance of medical service robots in the medical intelligence era: an empirical study based on an extended AI device use acceptance model," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Amy Wenxuan Ding & Shibo Li & Patrali Chatterjee, 2015. "Learning User Real-Time Intent for Optimal Dynamic Web Page Transformation," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 26(2), pages 339-359, June.
    13. Engström, Emma & Strimling, Pontus, 2020. "Deep learning diffusion by infusion into preexisting technologies – Implications for users and society at large," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    14. Asrar Ahmed Sabir & Iftikhar Ahmad & Hassan Ahmad & Muhammad Rafiq & Muhammad Asghar Khan & Neelum Noreen, 2023. "Consumer Acceptance and Adoption of AI Robo-Advisors in Fintech Industry," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-24, March.
    15. Lars Hornuf & Maximilian Meiler, 2024. "Factors Driving Adoption of Humanoid Service Robots in Banks," CESifo Working Paper Series 11366, CESifo.
    16. Tzu-Hsin Chu & Cheng-Min Chao & Hsieh-Hsi Liu & Der-Fa Chen, 2022. "Developing an Extended Theory of UTAUT 2 Model to Explore Factors Influencing Taiwanese Consumer Adoption of Intelligent Elevators," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
    17. Rizomyliotis, Ioannis & Kastanakis, Minas N. & Giovanis, Apostolos & Konstantoulaki, Kleopatra & Kostopoulos, Ioannis, 2022. "“How mAy I help you today?” The use of AI chatbots in small family businesses and the moderating role of customer affective commitment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 329-340.
    18. Min Jung Kang & Yong Cheol Hwang, 2022. "Exploring the Factors Affecting the Continued Usage Intention of IoT-Based Healthcare Wearable Devices Using the TAM Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-25, September.
    19. Gerlach, Johannes M. & Lutz, Julia K.T., 2021. "Digital financial advice solutions – Evidence on factors affecting the future usage intention and the moderating effect of experience," Journal of Economics and Business, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    20. Christian Arnold & Kai-Ingo Voigt, 2019. "Determinants of Industrial Internet of Things Adoption in German Manufacturing Companies," International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management (IJITM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 16(06), pages 1-21, October.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:94:y:2024:i:c:s1059056024004039. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.