IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v94y2024ics105905602400368x.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative analysis of responses of risky and safe haven assets to stock market risk before and after the yield curve inversions in the U.S

Author

Listed:
  • Sokhanvar, Amin
  • Hammoudeh, Shawkat

Abstract

This study examines the response of safe-haven assets (gold, US dollar) and Bitcoin to market risk before and after yield curve inversions in the U.S. market. Using the VIX volatility index and static and dynamic cross-quantilogram approach, the analysis reveals that gold and the U.S. dollar act as safe havens, showing positive responses to increased VIX values, while Bitcoin behaves as a risky asset, negatively responding to higher VIX values during market turbulence. Changes in the VIX index have an immediate impact on asset price returns, but the effect diminishes over time, suggesting the need for timely updates to investment strategies. Yield curve inversions have altered the VIX-US dollar relationship: pre-inversion changes were influential in calmer markets, but post-inversion, they played a bigger role during turbulent phases, suggesting potential changes in investor behavior and market dynamics. The findings offer practical insights for investors seeking stability and protection during uncertain market conditions.

Suggested Citation

  • Sokhanvar, Amin & Hammoudeh, Shawkat, 2024. "Comparative analysis of responses of risky and safe haven assets to stock market risk before and after the yield curve inversions in the U.S," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:94:y:2024:i:c:s105905602400368x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2024.103376
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S105905602400368X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2024.103376?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:94:y:2024:i:c:s105905602400368x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.