IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v93y2024ipap970-984.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does annual report readability influence the design of SEOs?

Author

Listed:
  • Puwanenthiren, Premkanth
  • Azam, Md Saiful
  • Jahangir Ali, Muhammad
  • Nadarajah, Sivathaasan

Abstract

Motivated by the rapid growth in non-quantitative corporate disclosure and seasoned equity offerings (SEOs) in the U.S., we take a fresh look at the decision-making process behind accelerated offerings in SEOs, with a specific emphasis on the readability of annual reports within 10-K filings. In particular, our study explores whether readability of annual reports affects the choice of SEOs methods. Using a hand-collected sample of 3143 instances of seasoned equity issues between 2002 and 2021, we show a significantly positive relation between readability scores and accelerated offerings. These results hold across various robustness tests. We further reveal a negative relationship between abnormal operating performance and long-term stock performance following the announcements of SEOs, demonstrating that: firstly, SEOs provide valuable insights into future earnings; and secondly, these insights have a lasting impact on stock performance. Overall, our evidence strongly highlights the substantial influence of annual report readability on the design of SEOs, emphasizing the critical importance of conveying financial information concisely and effectively to the market.

Suggested Citation

  • Puwanenthiren, Premkanth & Azam, Md Saiful & Jahangir Ali, Muhammad & Nadarajah, Sivathaasan, 2024. "Does annual report readability influence the design of SEOs?," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PA), pages 970-984.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:93:y:2024:i:pa:p:970-984
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2024.03.062
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056024002272
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2024.03.062?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:93:y:2024:i:pa:p:970-984. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.