IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reveco/v88y2023icp1151-1172.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Evolution of digital economy research: A bibliometric analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Xia, Yan
  • Lv, Gongming
  • Wang, Huijuan
  • Ding, Lin

Abstract

As a new economic form, the digital economy has become an important manifestation of national comprehensive strength, which is an absolute key force to enhance international competitiveness and reshape the international economic landscape in the digital era. Hundreds of schools of thought contend on the digital economy, and a consensus theory and framework has not yet been formed. In order to clarify the development venation and research status of the digital economy, and highlight the key points of digital economy research field in the future, this paper conducts bibliometric analysis and visualization by using Cite Space on digital economy connotation and extension mainly from four respects: the period characteristics of published articles, the distribution characteristics of articles, the characteristics of keyword changes, and the evolution characteristics of research directions. We take the WOS Core Collection as the database, and sets the subject headings with the digital economy connotation and extension as the retrieval target, and finally obtained 918 and 10,735 articles respectively as of 2022. We find that (a) the research on the connotation of the digital economy has experienced a long incubation and germination period, while the denotation period has maintained a long period of popularity, and both have ushered in a research climax in recent years; (b) the research team on the connotation of the digital economy is relatively scattered, and there is no unified consensus on the connotation of the digital economy, while the connection between the denotation period teams is relatively close; (c) from the perspective of keywords, “internet” and “big data” have caused a local upsurge in digital economy research. Otherwise, the denotation period hotspot of the digital economy is about 15 years earlier than the connotation research on average, which provides fertile soil for the formation, development and maturity of the digital economy connotation; (d) judging from the citation frequency of references, the total number of research articles on the connotation of the digital economy published after 2017 is relatively high and relatively concentrated, and a consensus on the understanding of the connotation of the digital economy has begun to form; (e) from the perspective of the evolution of research directions, “Information Science Library Science”, “Computer Science” and “Government Law” are the research hotspots in recent years, and “Public Administration” and “Engineering” may be the research growth points in the next few years.

Suggested Citation

  • Xia, Yan & Lv, Gongming & Wang, Huijuan & Ding, Lin, 2023. "Evolution of digital economy research: A bibliometric analysis," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 1151-1172.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:88:y:2023:i:c:p:1151-1172
    DOI: 10.1016/j.iref.2023.07.051
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1059056023002599
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.iref.2023.07.051?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David H. Autor & Frank Levy & Richard J. Murnane, 2003. "The skill content of recent technological change: an empirical exploration," Proceedings, Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, issue Nov.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Tian, Lichuan & Sun, Kai & Yang, Jie & Zhao, Yang, 2024. "Does digital economy affect corporate ESG performance? New insights from China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 93(PB), pages 964-980.
    2. Guan, Kaolei & Fu, Mengting & Zhu, Haining, 2024. "Opportunistic behaviour behind corporate digitalization disclosure: The moderating role of economic policy uncertainty," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    3. Jinqi Su & Changhong Dong & Ke Su & Lin He, 2023. "Research on the Construction of Digital Economy Index System Based on K-means-SA Algorithm," SAGE Open, , vol. 13(4), pages 21582440231, December.
    4. Wen, Ting & Qi, Sinan & Qian, Yue, 2024. "Index measurement and analysis on spatial-temporal evolution of China's new economy based on the DPSIR model," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 252-264.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Samantha A. Sharpe & Cristina M. Martinez-Fernandez, 2021. "The Implications of Green Employment: Making a Just Transition in ASEAN," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-19, July.
    2. Tommaso AGASISTI & Geraint JOHNES & Marco PACCAGNELLA, 2021. "Tasks, occupations and wages in OECD countries," International Labour Review, International Labour Organization, vol. 160(1), pages 85-112, March.
    3. Katrin Huber & Geske Rolvering, 2023. "Public child care and mothers’ career trajectories," Working Papers 228, Bavarian Graduate Program in Economics (BGPE).
    4. Loebbing, Jonas, 2018. "An Elementary Theory of Endogenous Technical Change and Wage Inequality," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181603, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    5. Patrick Mellacher, 2021. "Growth, Inequality and Declining Business Dynamism in a Unified Schumpeter Mark I + II Model," Papers 2111.09407, arXiv.org, revised Nov 2023.
    6. Nicholas Bloom & Tarek Alexander Hassan & Aakash Kalyani & Josh Lerner & Ahmed Tahoun, 2021. "The diffusion of disruptive technologies," CEP Discussion Papers dp1798, Centre for Economic Performance, LSE.
    7. Keller, Wolfgang & Utar, Hale, 2023. "International trade and job polarization: Evidence at the worker level," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    8. J. Bradford Jensen & Lori G. Kletzer, 2010. "Measuring Tradable Services and the Task Content of Offshorable Services Jobs," NBER Chapters, in: Labor in the New Economy, pages 309-335, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Rabensteiner, Thomas & Guschanski, Alexander, 2022. "Autonomy and wage divergence: evidence from European survey data," Greenwich Papers in Political Economy 37925, University of Greenwich, Greenwich Political Economy Research Centre.
    10. Iftekhairul Islam & Fahad Shaon, 2020. "If the Prospect of Some Occupations Are Stagnating With Technological Advancement? A Task Attribute Approach to Detect Employment Vulnerability," Papers 2001.02783, arXiv.org.
    11. Nunes, Ashley, 2016. "Increased productivity efforts yield few rewards in the knowledge economy," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 338-347.
    12. Lex Borghans & Bas ter Weel, 2011. "Computers, skills and wages," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 43(29), pages 4607-4622.
    13. Aleksandra Parteka & Joanna Wolszczak-Derlacz, 2020. "Wage response to global production links: evidence for workers from 28 European countries (2005–2014)," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 156(4), pages 769-801, November.
    14. Bhorat, Haroon & Goga, Sumayya & Stanwix, Benjamin, 2014. "Skills-biased labour demand and the pursuit of inclusive growth in South Africa," WIDER Working Paper Series 130, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    15. David Hémous & Morten Olsen, 2022. "The Rise of the Machines: Automation, Horizontal Innovation, and Income Inequality," American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, American Economic Association, vol. 14(1), pages 179-223, January.
    16. Ying Zhang & Yingli Huang, 2023. "Killing Two Birds with One Stone or Missing One of Them? The Synergistic Governance Effect of China’s Carbon Emissions Trading Scheme on Pollution Control and Carbon Emission Reduction," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-25, June.
    17. Maynou, L. & McGuire, A. & Serra-Sastre, V., 2019. "Exploring the Impact of New Medical Technology on Workforce Planning," Working Papers 19/07, Department of Economics, City University London.
    18. Battisti, Michele & Gatto, Massimo Del & Parmeter, Christopher F., 2022. "Skill-biased technical change and labor market inefficiency," Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    19. Holmes, Craig & Mayhew, Ken, 2015. "Have UK Earnings Distributions Polarised?," INET Oxford Working Papers 2015-02, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    20. Hamid Boustanifar & Everett Grant & Ariell Reshef, 2018. "Wages and Human Capital in Finance: International Evidence, 1970–2011 [Financial reform: what shakes it? What shapes it?]," Review of Finance, European Finance Association, vol. 22(2), pages 699-745.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reveco:v:88:y:2023:i:c:p:1151-1172. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/inca/620165 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.