IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/retrec/v65y2017icp24-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Guiding cities to pursue a smart mobility paradigm: An example from vehicle routing guidance and its traffic and operational effects

Author

Listed:
  • Melo, Sandra
  • Macedo, Joaquim
  • Baptista, Patrícia

Abstract

The concept of 'smart cities' is rooted on the approach taken by cities to reconcile the three often conflicting objectives of economic efficiency, environmental quality and social equity. The expectation that smart cities may promote the adoption of scalable solutions that take advantage of information and communication technologies (ICT) to increase their effectiveness, reduce costs and to improve the quality of life is great among academia, business and governmental stakeholders. Traffic management systems in its multiple applications (including re-routing) are an example of ICT solutions that can expectably lead to the purpose pursued by 'smart cities'. This paper develops a performance evaluation of re-routing for passenger and commercial vehicles with a case study in the city of Lisbon, Portugal. The paper examines how the provision of guidance information to drivers affects traffic performance, operational costs and environmental conditions at different spatial references, namely route level and urban network level. The simulation results indicate that the re-routing can not only reduce travel times, but also enhance the efficiency of roads in the city network and as well the traffic performance at the route level of analysis. The improvement at local route levels (such as corridor/route) is more significant than at the city network level. For the urban network level, simulation results suggest that re-routing can bring variations in travel and delays that may reach 2% and 6%, respectively, when a 10% drivers’ compliance rate is considered. Individual drivers are more likely to comply to deviate than urban logistics drivers and bus drivers.

Suggested Citation

  • Melo, Sandra & Macedo, Joaquim & Baptista, Patrícia, 2017. "Guiding cities to pursue a smart mobility paradigm: An example from vehicle routing guidance and its traffic and operational effects," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 24-33.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:65:y:2017:i:c:p:24-33
    DOI: 10.1016/j.retrec.2017.09.007
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0739885917301932
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.retrec.2017.09.007?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. André Luis Azevedo Guedes & Jeferson Carvalho Alvarenga & Maurício Dos Santos Sgarbi Goulart & Martius Vicente Rodriguez y Rodriguez & Carlos Alberto Pereira Soares, 2018. "Smart Cities: The Main Drivers for Increasing the Intelligence of Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-19, August.
    2. Alina-Ramona Butnariu & Procopie-Florin Gusul, 2021. "Public Innovation in Romania: Financing Smart City Initiatives Using European Funds in Small and Medium Sized Cities," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(2), pages 86-94, December.
    3. Douglas Mitieka & Rose Luke & Hossana Twinomurinzi & Joash Mageto, 2023. "Smart Mobility in Urban Areas: A Bibliometric Review and Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Paulo Antonio Maldonado Silveira Alonso Munhoz & Fabricio da Costa Dias & Christine Kowal Chinelli & André Luis Azevedo Guedes & João Alberto Neves dos Santos & Wainer da Silveira e Silva & Carlos Alb, 2020. "Smart Mobility: The Main Drivers for Increasing the Intelligence of Urban Mobility," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-25, December.
    5. Tanja Manders & Elke Klaassen, 2019. "Unpacking the Smart Mobility Concept in the Dutch Context Based on a Text Mining Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(23), pages 1-24, November.
    6. Melo, Sandra & Macedo, Joaquim & Baptista, Patrícia, 2019. "Capacity-sharing in logistics solutions: A new pathway towards sustainability," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 143-151.
    7. Batabyal, Amitrajeet A. & Beladi, Hamid, 2019. "The optimal provision of information and communication technologies in smart cities," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 216-220.
    8. Evandro Gonzalez Lima & Christine Kowal Chinelli & Andre Luis Azevedo Guedes & Elaine Garrido Vazquez & Ahmed W. A. Hammad & Assed Naked Haddad & Carlos Alberto Pereira Soares, 2020. "Smart and Sustainable Cities: The Main Guidelines of City Statute for Increasing the Intelligence of Brazilian Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-26, January.
    9. Stefano de Luca & Roberta Di Pace & Silvio Memoli & Luigi Pariota, 2020. "Sustainable Traffic Management in an Urban Area: An Integrated Framework for Real-Time Traffic Control and Route Guidance Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-20, January.
    10. Comi, Antonio, 2020. "A modelling framework to forecast urban goods flows," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    City logistics; Re-routing; Smart cities; Smart mobility; Compliance rate;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R41 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion; Travel Time; Safety and Accidents; Transportation Noise
    • R48 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Government Pricing and Policy
    • R49 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:retrec:v:65:y:2017:i:c:p:24-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/620614/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.