IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v51y2015icp603-612.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparative analysis of carbon dioxide emission factors for energy industries in European Union countries

Author

Listed:
  • Konstantinaviciute, Inga
  • Bobinaite, Viktorija

Abstract

Strategies for mitigating climate change require accurate estimates of the greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Estimates of the amounts of carbon dioxide (CO2) and other GHGs emitted into the atmosphere are crucial for planning and analyzing mitigation efforts. Emissions factors are the fundamental tool in developing national emissions inventories. The quality of GHG inventories has been a long-standing issue among the scientific community and its importance has more recently risen on the policy agenda because national inventories are now the basis of legally-binding commitments. According to the IPCC Good Practice Guidance comparison with the recommended IPCC default values may be informative in establishing the comparability of the country-specificity of the emission factors used. Such comparison may help to identify data outlier where uncertainty ranges do not overlap. The main objective of this article is to assess comparability of CO2 emissions factors between EU countries for energy industries and to evaluate whether the reporting of emissions from energy industries is good enough to monitor progress towards the emission reduction targets set under international agreements according to the quality criteria of transparency, consistency, comparability, completeness and accuracy. Performed analysis of CO2 emission factors showed that almost all EU countries seeking to reduce uncertainty apply country-specific CO2 emission factors for major sources of emissions from energy industries. Application of country-specific emission factors ensures greater accuracy and lower uncertainty of GHG inventory. Comparative analysis showed that country-specific CO2 emission factors applied in EU countries for the main fuels combusted in the energy industries have been established in a comparable way taking into account uncertainty ranges defined in the IPCC Guidelines. Seeking to ensure more accurate estimates of CO2 emissions it is important further improve knowledge on emission factors at individual plant level that allow estimating GHG emissions with lower uncertainty applying higher level tier methods.

Suggested Citation

  • Konstantinaviciute, Inga & Bobinaite, Viktorija, 2015. "Comparative analysis of carbon dioxide emission factors for energy industries in European Union countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 603-612.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:51:y:2015:i:c:p:603-612
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.058
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032115006309
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.058?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Myroslava Lesiv & Andriy Bun & Matthias Jonas, 2014. "Analysis of change in relative uncertainty in GHG emissions from stationary sources for the EU 15," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 124(3), pages 505-518, June.
    2. Gregg Marland & Khrystyna Hamal & Matthias Jonas, 2009. "How Uncertain Are Estimates of CO2 Emissions?," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 13(1), pages 4-7, February.
    3. Nina Uvarova & Vladimir Kuzovkin & Sergey Paramonov & Michael Gytarsky, 2014. "The improvement of greenhouse gas inventory as a tool for reduction emission uncertainties for operations with oil in the Russian Federation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 124(3), pages 535-544, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Xu, Z.Y. & Mao, H.C. & Liu, D.S. & Wang, R.Z., 2018. "Waste heat recovery of power plant with large scale serial absorption heat pumps," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 1097-1105.
    2. Radovanović, Mirjana & Filipović, Sanja & Pavlović, Dejan, 2017. "Energy security measurement – A sustainable approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 1020-1032.
    3. Wang, Yihan & Wen, Zongguo & Yao, Jianguo & Doh Dinga, Christian, 2020. "Multi-objective optimization of synergic energy conservation and CO2 emission reduction in China's iron and steel industry under uncertainty," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    4. Chen, Jiandong & Cheng, Shulei & Song, Malin & Wu, Yinyin, 2016. "A carbon emissions reduction index: Integrating the volume and allocation of regional emissions," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 1154-1164.
    5. Su, Meirong & Pauleit, Stephan & Yin, Xuemei & Zheng, Ying & Chen, Shaoqing & Xu, Chao, 2016. "Greenhouse gas emission accounting for EU member states from 1991 to 2012," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 759-768.
    6. Feng, Zhiying & Tang, Wenhu & Niu, Zhewen & Wu, Qinghua, 2018. "Bi-level allocation of carbon emission permits based on clustering analysis and weighted voting: A case study in China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 1122-1135.
    7. Ozturk, Fatma & Keles, Melek & Evrendilek, Fatih, 2016. "Quantifying rates and drivers of change in long-term sector- and country-specific trends of carbon dioxide-equivalent greenhouse gas emissions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 823-831.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Khrystyna Boychuk & Rostyslav Bun, 2014. "Regional spatial inventories (cadastres) of GHG emissions in the Energy sector: Accounting for uncertainty," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 124(3), pages 561-574, June.
    2. Mathieu Fortin, 2021. "Comparison of uncertainty quantification techniques for national greenhouse gas inventories," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 26(2), pages 1-20, February.
    3. McCullough, Michael & Holland, David W. & Painter, Kathleen M. & Stodick, Leroy & Yoder, Jonathan K., 2011. "Economic and Environmental Impacts of Washington State Biofuel Policy Alternatives," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 36(3), pages 1-15.
    4. Bukvić, Rajko, 2017. "Ефекат Стакленика, Глобално Загревање И Кјотски Протокол [Greenhouse Effect, Global Warming and Kyoto Protocol]," MPRA Paper 83953, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2017.
    5. Ozturk, Fatma & Keles, Melek & Evrendilek, Fatih, 2016. "Quantifying rates and drivers of change in long-term sector- and country-specific trends of carbon dioxide-equivalent greenhouse gas emissions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 823-831.
    6. Bukvić, Rajko & Kartavykh, Marina & Zakharov, Vladimir, 2015. "Mechanisms and projects for reducing greenhouse gases emissions in Russia," MPRA Paper 74809, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2015.
    7. Ernesto C. Marujo & José R. U. C. Almeida & Luiz F. L. Souza & Alan R. S. P. Costa & Paulo C. G. Miranda & Arthur A. Covatti & Solange G. Holschuch & Potira M. S. Melo, 2023. "Confidence in Greenhouse Gas Emission Estimation: A Case Study of Formaldehyde Manufacturing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Johanne Pelletier & Jonah Busch & Catherine Potvin, 2015. "Addressing uncertainty upstream or downstream of accounting for emissions reductions from deforestation and forest degradation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 130(4), pages 635-648, June.
    9. Cui, Duo & Deng, Zhu & Liu, Zhu, 2019. "China’s non-fossil fuel CO2 emissions from industrial processes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(C).
    10. Talbot, David & Boiral, Olivier, 2013. "Can we trust corporates GHG inventories? An investigation among Canada's large final emitters," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1075-1085.
    11. Matthias Jonas & Piotr Żebrowski, 2019. "The crux with reducing emissions in the long-term: The underestimated “now” versus the overestimated “then”," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 1169-1190, August.
    12. Jolanta Jarnicka & Piotr Żebrowski, 2019. "Learning in greenhouse gas emission inventories in terms of uncertainty improvement over time," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 1143-1168, August.
    13. Bukvić, Rajko & Voronov, Mikhail & Chasovskikh, Viktor, 2015. "Киотский Протокол И Активность России: Механизмы Сокращения Выбросов Парниковых Газов [The Kyoto Protocol and the Activity of Russia: Mechanisms of Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions]," MPRA Paper 70845, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 2015.
    14. Youngseok Hwang & Stephan Schlüter & Tanupriya Choudhury & Jung-Sup Um, 2021. "Comparative Evaluation of Top-Down GOSAT XCO 2 vs. Bottom-Up National Reports in the European Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-15, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:51:y:2015:i:c:p:603-612. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.