IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v42y2015icp170-181.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Mitigating wind-turbine induced avian mortality: Sensory, aerodynamic and cognitive constraints and options

Author

Listed:
  • May, R.
  • Reitan, O.
  • Bevanger, K.
  • Lorentsen, S.-H.
  • Nygård, T.

Abstract

Because of the fast rate of wind-energy development it will become a challenge to verify impacts on birdlife and construe ways to minimise these. Birds colliding with wind turbines are generally perceived as one of the major conflict issues for wind-energy development. Development of effective and practical measures to reduce bird mortality related to offshore and onshore wind energy is therefore paramount to avoid any delay in consenting processes. The expected efficacy of post-construction mitigation measures for wind-turbine induced avian mortality can be expected to be species-specific with regard to audible, optical and biomechanical constraints and options. Species-specific sensory faculties limit the ability to observe a wind turbine in a given circumstance. Their consequent cognitive perception may depend on the possibilities for associating wind turbines with risk, and discriminating these from other sources. Last but not least, perceived risks may only be evaded when their aerodynamic, locomotive physiology enables them to do so in due time. In order to be able to identify and construe functional mitigation measures these aspects need to be taken into account. Measures eliciting a series of intermittent strong stimuli that are variable in frequency may limit habituation effects; these should only be elicited specifically to mitigate imminent collision. Thus measures either adjusting turbine operation or warning/deterring birds approaching turbines are expected to be most functional. Warning signals may either be based on optical or audible stimuli; however, birds׳ hearing is inferior to humans while their visual acuity and temporal resolution is higher, but with great differences among species. Implementing effective mitigation measures could reduce the general level of conflicts with birdlife and thus enable both the development at new sites, at sites that have been declared having too high conflict levels, and utilise the wind resources better at specific sites without increasing the conflict levels.

Suggested Citation

  • May, R. & Reitan, O. & Bevanger, K. & Lorentsen, S.-H. & Nygård, T., 2015. "Mitigating wind-turbine induced avian mortality: Sensory, aerodynamic and cognitive constraints and options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 170-181.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:42:y:2015:i:c:p:170-181
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032114008193
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2014.10.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert D. Magrath & Benjamin J. Pitcher & Janet L. Gardner, 2007. "A mutual understanding? Interspecific responses by birds to each other's aerial alarm calls," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(5), pages 944-951.
    2. Innes C. Cuthill & Martin Stevens & Jenna Sheppard & Tracey Maddocks & C. Alejandro Párraga & Tom S. Troscianko, 2005. "Disruptive coloration and background pattern matching," Nature, Nature, vol. 434(7029), pages 72-74, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Yushi Kunugi & Toshi H. Arimura & Miwa Nakai, 2021. "The Long-Term Impact of Wind Power Generation on a Local Community: Economics Analysis of Subjective Well-Being Data in Chōshi City," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Zerrahn, Alexander, 2017. "Wind Power and Externalities," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 245-260.
    3. Victoria Gartman & Lea Bulling & Marie Dahmen & Gesa Geißler & Johann Köppel, 2016. "Mitigation Measures for Wildlife in Wind Energy Development, Consolidating the State of Knowledge — Part 1: Planning and Siting, Construction," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 18(03), pages 1-45, September.
    4. Noel, William & Weis, Timothy M. & Yu, Qiulin & Leach, Andrew & Fleck, Brian A., 2022. "Mapping the evolution of Canada’s wind energy fleet," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    5. Jens Lüdeke, 2017. "Offshore Wind Energy: Good Practice in Impact Assessment, Mitigation and Compensation," Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management (JEAPM), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 19(01), pages 1-31, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melia G. Nafus & Jennifer M. Germano & Jeanette A. Perry & Brian D. Todd & Allyson Walsh & Ronald R. Swaisgood, 2015. "Hiding in plain sight: a study on camouflage and habitat selection in a slow-moving desert herbivore," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(5), pages 1389-1394.
    2. Dylan H N Thomas & Karin Kjernsmo & Nicholas E Scott-Samuel & Heather M Whitney & Innes C Cuthill, 2023. "Interactions between color and gloss in iridescent camouflage," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(5), pages 751-758.
    3. Ari E. Martínez & Rosana T. Zenil, 2012. "Foraging guild influences dependence on heterospecific alarm calls in Amazonian bird flocks," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 544-550.
    4. Jolyon Troscianko & Jared Wilson-Aggarwal & David Griffiths & Claire N. Spottiswoode & Martin Stevens, 2017. "Relative advantages of dichromatic and trichromatic color vision in camouflage breaking," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(2), pages 556-564.
    5. Branislav Igic & Robert D. Magrath, 2014. "A songbird mimics different heterospecific alarm calls in response to different types of threat," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(3), pages 538-548.
    6. Jennifer L Kelley & Ian Taylor & Nathan S Hart & Julian C Partridge, 2017. "Aquatic prey use countershading camouflage to match the visual background," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(5), pages 1314-1322.
    7. repec:hal:journl:hal-04683689 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Kaori Tsurui & Atsushi Honma & Takayoshi Nishida, 2010. "Camouflage Effects of Various Colour-Marking Morphs against Different Microhabitat Backgrounds in a Polymorphic Pygmy Grasshopper Tetrix japonica," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(7), pages 1-7, July.
    9. Alyssa S Hess & Andrew J Wismer & Corey J Bohil & Mark B Neider, 2016. "On the Hunt: Searching for Poorly Defined Camouflaged Targets," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, March.
    10. Ossi Nokelainen & Sanni A. Silvasti & Sharon Y. Strauss & Niklas Wahlberg & Johanna Mappes, 2024. "Predator selection on phenotypic variability of cryptic and aposematic moths," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:42:y:2015:i:c:p:170-181. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.