IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v28y2017i2p556-564..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relative advantages of dichromatic and trichromatic color vision in camouflage breaking

Author

Listed:
  • Jolyon Troscianko
  • Jared Wilson-Aggarwal
  • David Griffiths
  • Claire N. Spottiswoode
  • Martin Stevens

Abstract

Lay Summary Online camouflage games reveal trichromats are better at finding birds and eggs than simulated dichromats, but dichromats can learn faster. Color vision varies markedly between species, such as between dichromats with 2 different color receptors, and trichromats with 3. Contrary to expectation, trichromats captured the nightjars and eggs faster than simulated dichromats, but simulated dichromats' capture times were affected less by a number of camouflage variables, and they learnt to capture eggs faster.Twitter: @SensoryEcology #colsci

Suggested Citation

  • Jolyon Troscianko & Jared Wilson-Aggarwal & David Griffiths & Claire N. Spottiswoode & Martin Stevens, 2017. "Relative advantages of dichromatic and trichromatic color vision in camouflage breaking," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(2), pages 556-564.
    • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:28:y:2017:i:2:p:556-564.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/arw185
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martin Stevens & Kate L. A. Marshall & Jolyon Troscianko & Sive Finlay & Dan Burnand & Sarah L. Chadwick, 2013. "Revealed by conspicuousness: distractive markings reduce camouflage," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 24(1), pages 213-222.
    2. Innes C. Cuthill & Martin Stevens & Jenna Sheppard & Tracey Maddocks & C. Alejandro Párraga & Tom S. Troscianko, 2005. "Disruptive coloration and background pattern matching," Nature, Nature, vol. 434(7029), pages 72-74, March.
    3. Nathaniel J. Dominy & Peter W. Lucas, 2001. "Ecological importance of trichromatic vision to primates," Nature, Nature, vol. 410(6826), pages 363-366, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Anna E Hughes & Emmanuelle S Briolat & Lina María Arenas & Eric Liggins & Martin Stevens, 2023. "Varying benefits of generalist and specialist camouflage in two versus four background environments," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(3), pages 426-436.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Melia G. Nafus & Jennifer M. Germano & Jeanette A. Perry & Brian D. Todd & Allyson Walsh & Ronald R. Swaisgood, 2015. "Hiding in plain sight: a study on camouflage and habitat selection in a slow-moving desert herbivore," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(5), pages 1389-1394.
    2. Dylan H N Thomas & Karin Kjernsmo & Nicholas E Scott-Samuel & Heather M Whitney & Innes C Cuthill, 2023. "Interactions between color and gloss in iridescent camouflage," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(5), pages 751-758.
    3. Anna E Hughes & Emmanuelle S Briolat & Lina María Arenas & Eric Liggins & Martin Stevens, 2023. "Varying benefits of generalist and specialist camouflage in two versus four background environments," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 34(3), pages 426-436.
    4. Jennifer L Kelley & Ian Taylor & Nathan S Hart & Julian C Partridge, 2017. "Aquatic prey use countershading camouflage to match the visual background," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 28(5), pages 1314-1322.
    5. Lucas Goulart da Silva & Milton Cezar Ribeiro & Érica Hasui & Carla Aparecida da Costa & Rogério Grassetto Teixeira da Cunha, 2015. "Patch Size, Functional Isolation, Visibility and Matrix Permeability Influences Neotropical Primate Occurrence within Highly Fragmented Landscapes," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(2), pages 1-20, February.
    6. repec:hal:journl:hal-04683689 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Kanghoon Jung & Jerald D Kralik, 2013. "Get It While It’s Hot: A Peak-First Bias in Self-Generated Choice Order in Rhesus Macaques," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(12), pages 1-7, December.
    8. May, R. & Reitan, O. & Bevanger, K. & Lorentsen, S.-H. & Nygård, T., 2015. "Mitigating wind-turbine induced avian mortality: Sensory, aerodynamic and cognitive constraints and options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 170-181.
    9. Klaudia P. Szatko & Maria M. Korympidou & Yanli Ran & Philipp Berens & Deniz Dalkara & Timm Schubert & Thomas Euler & Katrin Franke, 2020. "Neural circuits in the mouse retina support color vision in the upper visual field," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-14, December.
    10. Kaori Tsurui & Atsushi Honma & Takayoshi Nishida, 2010. "Camouflage Effects of Various Colour-Marking Morphs against Different Microhabitat Backgrounds in a Polymorphic Pygmy Grasshopper Tetrix japonica," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 5(7), pages 1-7, July.
    11. Alyssa S Hess & Andrew J Wismer & Corey J Bohil & Mark B Neider, 2016. "On the Hunt: Searching for Poorly Defined Camouflaged Targets," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-18, March.
    12. Ossi Nokelainen & Sanni A. Silvasti & Sharon Y. Strauss & Niklas Wahlberg & Johanna Mappes, 2024. "Predator selection on phenotypic variability of cryptic and aposematic moths," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-12, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:28:y:2017:i:2:p:556-564.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.