IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/oup/beheco/v25y2014i3p538-548..html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A songbird mimics different heterospecific alarm calls in response to different types of threat

Author

Listed:
  • Branislav Igic
  • Robert D. Magrath

Abstract

Birds frequently mimic other species’ alarm calls, but the type of information conveyed to receivers, and therefore the function of mimetic alarm calls, is often unknown. Alarm calls can convey predator-specific information that influences how receivers respond: aerial alarms signal the presence of flying predators and provoke receivers to flee, whereas mobbing alarm calls signal the presence of less dangerous predators and provoke receivers to mob. The function of mimetic alarm calls may therefore depend on the type of heterospecific alarm calls mimicked. We examined the use of alarm call mimicry by brown thornbills (Acanthiza pusilla) across different contexts of danger: terrestrial threat, aerial threat, when captured by a predator and during nest attack. Thornbills were most likely to include mimetic alarm calls among their vocalizations when captured and during nest attack, less likely in response to terrestrial and aerial predator threats, and least likely in the absence of any threat. Furthermore, the type of danger affected the type of mimetic alarm calls used: thornbills mimicked mobbing alarm calls in response to terrestrial threat and aerial alarm calls in response to aerial threat but also during capture and nest attack where no aerial danger was present. We suggest that mimicking predator-appropriate heterospecific alarm calls in response to aerial and terrestrial threats may facilitate interspecific alarm communication with other prey species, whereas mimicking heterospecific aerial alarm calls in the absence of aerial predators might deceptively startle predators to release captured callers or offspring when attacked.

Suggested Citation

  • Branislav Igic & Robert D. Magrath, 2014. "A songbird mimics different heterospecific alarm calls in response to different types of threat," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 25(3), pages 538-548.
  • Handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:3:p:538-548.
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1093/beheco/aru018
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Robert D. Magrath & Benjamin J. Pitcher & Janet L. Gardner, 2007. "A mutual understanding? Interspecific responses by birds to each other's aerial alarm calls," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 18(5), pages 944-951.
    2. Pamela M. Fallow & Janet L. Gardner & Robert D. Magrath, 2011. "Sound familiar? Acoustic similarity provokes responses to unfamiliar heterospecific alarm calls," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 22(2), pages 401-410.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. David Wheatcroft & Trevor D. Price, 2015. "Rates of signal evolution are associated with the nature of interspecific communication," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(1), pages 83-90.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ari E. Martínez & Rosana T. Zenil, 2012. "Foraging guild influences dependence on heterospecific alarm calls in Amazonian bird flocks," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 23(3), pages 544-550.
    2. Leanna N. DeJong & Samuel D. Cowell & Thuy Nhi N. Nguyen & Darren S. Proppe, 2015. "Attracting songbirds with conspecific playback: a community approach," Behavioral Ecology, International Society for Behavioral Ecology, vol. 26(5), pages 1379-1388.
    3. May, R. & Reitan, O. & Bevanger, K. & Lorentsen, S.-H. & Nygård, T., 2015. "Mitigating wind-turbine induced avian mortality: Sensory, aerodynamic and cognitive constraints and options," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 42(C), pages 170-181.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:oup:beheco:v:25:y:2014:i:3:p:538-548.. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Oxford University Press (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://academic.oup.com/beheco .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.