IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v197y2024ics1364032124001369.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Amendments to model frameworks to optimize the anaerobic digestion and support the green transition

Author

Listed:
  • Tsapekos, Panagiotis
  • Lovato, Giovanna
  • Domingues Rodrigues, José Alberto
  • Alvarado-Morales, Merlin

Abstract

The current world energy system is still heavily dependent on fossil resources (non-renewable and depletable). Anaerobic digestion (AD) has been pointed out as a great strategy for waste and wastewater management while producing biogas that can be upgraded to biomethane. Mathematical models can provide insights into understanding and analyzing important aspects of any process, while minimizing experimental effort, risk, and cost. However, modeling as means to predict, control, and optimize the performance of biological processes on pilot or higher scale is rather scarce. The so-called “BioModel” and Anaerobic Digestion Model No. 1 (ADM1) are well-known model frameworks to understand, characterize, and simulate the anaerobic digestion (AD) processes. Multiple amendments, modifications, and additions occurred during the past years in both frameworks. Therefore. the present article aims to review the most relevant updates made to these models and enlighten the perspectives on the role of kinetic modeling in bio-based gas production. The potential of the existing highly efficient AD models to serve as a basis to develop, predict, and finally support the biogas and bio-methanation processes at a higher scale is discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Tsapekos, Panagiotis & Lovato, Giovanna & Domingues Rodrigues, José Alberto & Alvarado-Morales, Merlin, 2024. "Amendments to model frameworks to optimize the anaerobic digestion and support the green transition," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:197:y:2024:i:c:s1364032124001369
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2024.114413
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032124001369
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2024.114413?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Strübing, Dietmar & Moeller, Andreas B. & Mößnang, Bettina & Lebuhn, Michael & Drewes, Jörg E. & Koch, Konrad, 2018. "Anaerobic thermophilic trickle bed reactor as a promising technology for flexible and demand-oriented H2/CO2 biomethanation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C), pages 543-554.
    2. Lovato, Giovanna & Kovalovszki, Adam & Alvarado-Morales, Merlin & Arjuna Jéglot, Arnaud Tristan & Rodrigues, José Alberto Domingues & Angelidaki, Irini, 2021. "Modelling bioaugmentation: Engineering intervention in anaerobic digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 1080-1087.
    3. Kovalovszki, Adam & Treu, Laura & Ellegaard, Lars & Luo, Gang & Angelidaki, Irini, 2020. "Modeling temperature response in bioenergy production: Novel solution to a common challenge of anaerobic digestion," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    4. Lübken, Manfred & Koch, Konrad & Gehring, Tito & Horn, Harald & Wichern, Marc, 2015. "Parameter estimation and long-term process simulation of a biogas reactor operated under trace elements limitation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 352-360.
    5. Néméhie Lawson & Merlin Alvarado-Morales & Panagiotis Tsapekos & Irini Angelidaki, 2021. "Techno-Economic Assessment of Biological Biogas Upgrading Based on Danish Biogas Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-18, December.
    6. Tsapekos, Panagiotis & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Zhu, Xinyu & Treu, Laura & Alfaro, Natalia & Kougias, Panagiotis G. & Angelidaki, Irini, 2022. "Lab- and pilot-scale anaerobic digestion of municipal bio-waste and potential of digestate for biogas upgrading sustained by microbial analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P1), pages 344-353.
    7. Gillessen, B. & Heinrichs, H. & Hake, J.-F. & Allelein, H.-J., 2019. "Natural gas as a bridge to sustainability: Infrastructure expansion regarding energy security and system transition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Lohani, Sunil Prasad & Wang, Shuai & Lackner, Susanne & Horn, Harald & Khanal, Sanjay Nath & Bakke, Rune, 2016. "ADM1 modeling of UASB treating domestic wastewater in Nepal," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 263-268.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Piotr Sulewski & Wiktor Ignaciuk & Magdalena Szymańska & Adam Wąs, 2023. "Development of the Biomethane Market in Europe," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-34, February.
    2. Asimakopoulos, Konstantinos & Kaufmann-Elfang, Martin & Lundholm-Høffner, Christoffer & Rasmussen, Niels B.K. & Grimalt-Alemany, Antonio & Gavala, Hariklia N. & Skiadas, Ioannis V., 2021. "Scale up study of a thermophilic trickle bed reactor performing syngas biomethanation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    3. Dandikas, Vasilis & Heuwinkel, Hauke & Lichti, Fabian & Eckl, Thomas & Drewes, Jörg E. & Koch, Konrad, 2018. "Correlation between hydrolysis rate constant and chemical composition of energy crops," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 34-42.
    4. Yang, Weixin & Pan, Lingying & Ding, Qinyi, 2023. "Dynamic analysis of natural gas substitution for crude oil: Scenario simulation and quantitative evaluation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    5. Jaeseok Yun & Sungyeon Kim & Jinmin Kim, 2024. "Digital Twin Technology in the Gas Industry: A Comparative Simulation Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-29, July.
    6. Grimalt-Alemany, Antonio & Asimakopoulos, Konstantinos & Skiadas, Ioannis V. & Gavala, Hariklia N., 2020. "Modeling of syngas biomethanation and catabolic route control in mesophilic and thermophilic mixed microbial consortia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(C).
    7. Begum, Sameena & Ahuja, Shruti & Anupoju, Gangagni Rao & Kuruti, Kranti & Juntupally, Sudharshan & Gandu, Bharath & Ahuja, D.K., 2017. "Process intensification with inline pre and post processing mechanism for valorization of poultry litter through high rate biomethanation technology: A full scale experience," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(PB), pages 428-436.
    8. Shirazi, Masoud & Fuinhas, José Alberto, 2023. "Portfolio decisions of primary energy sources and economic complexity: The world's large energy user evidence," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 347-361.
    9. Wu, Benteng & Lin, Richen & Kang, Xihui & Deng, Chen & Dobson, Alan D.W. & Murphy, Jerry D., 2021. "Improved robustness of ex-situ biological methanation for electro-fuel production through the addition of graphene," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    10. Liu, Hao & Su, Guandong & Okere, Chinedu J. & Li, Guozhang & Wang, Xiangchun & Cai, Yuzhe & Wu, Tong & Zheng, Lihui, 2022. "Working fluid-induced formation damage evaluation for commingled production of multi-layer natural gas reservoirs with flow rate method," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PB).
    11. Bułkowska, K. & Białobrzewski, I. & Klimiuk, E. & Pokój, T., 2018. "Kinetic parameters of volatile fatty acids uptake in the ADM1 as key factors for modeling co-digestion of silages with pig manure, thin stillage and glycerine phase," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 163-176.
    12. Brian Dahl Jønson & Lars Ole Lykke Mortensen & Jens Ejbye Schmidt & Martin Jeppesen & Juan-Rodrigo Bastidas-Oyanedel, 2022. "Flexibility as the Key to Stability: Optimization of Temperature and Gas Feed during Downtime towards Effective Integration of Biomethanation in an Intermittent Energy System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-15, August.
    13. Fesefeldt, M. & Capezzali, M. & Bozorg, M. & de Lapparent, M., 2021. "Evaluation of future scenarios for gas distribution networks under hypothesis of decreasing heat demand in urban zones," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    14. Susanne Theuerl & Christiane Herrmann & Monika Heiermann & Philipp Grundmann & Niels Landwehr & Ulrich Kreidenweis & Annette Prochnow, 2019. "The Future Agricultural Biogas Plant in Germany: A Vision," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-32, January.
    15. Tuğçe Dağlıoğlu & Tuba Ceren Öğüt & Guven Ozdemir & Nuri Azbar, 2021. "Comparative analysis of the effect of cell immobilization on the hydrogenothrophic biomethanation of CO2," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(3), pages 493-505, June.
    16. Emebu, Samuel & Pecha, Jiří & Janáčová, Dagmar, 2022. "Review on anaerobic digestion models: Model classification & elaboration of process phenomena," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    17. Wu, Benteng & Lin, Richen & Bose, Archishman & Huerta, Jorge Diaz & Kang, Xihui & Deng, Chen & Murphy, Jerry D., 2023. "Economic and environmental viability of biofuel production from organic wastes: A pathway towards competitive carbon neutrality," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    18. Zhang, Jiahao & Chen, Xiaodan & Wei, Yu & Bai, Lan, 2023. "Does the connectedness among fossil energy returns matter for renewable energy stock returns? Fresh insights from the Cross-Quantilogram analysis," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    19. Esra Ilbahar & Cengiz Kahraman & Selcuk Cebi, 2023. "Evaluation of sustainable energy planning scenarios with a new approach based on FCM, WASPAS and impact effort matrix," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(10), pages 11931-11955, October.
    20. Lim, Juin Yau & How, Bing Shen & Rhee, Gahee & Hwangbo, Soonho & Yoo, Chang Kyoo, 2020. "Transitioning of localized renewable energy system towards sustainable hydrogen development planning: P-graph approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:197:y:2024:i:c:s1364032124001369. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.