IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jsusta/v16y2024i14p5864-d1432081.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Twin Technology in the Gas Industry: A Comparative Simulation Study

Author

Listed:
  • Jaeseok Yun

    (Program in Converging Technology Systems and Standardization, Korea University, Sejong 30019, Republic of Korea)

  • Sungyeon Kim

    (Program in Converging Technology Systems and Standardization, Korea University, Sejong 30019, Republic of Korea)

  • Jinmin Kim

    (Department of Standards and Intelligence, Korea University, Sejong 30019, Republic of Korea)

Abstract

Continuous innovation is essential in the urban gas industry to achieve the stability of energy supply and sustainability. The continuous increase in the global demand for energy indicates that the urban gas industry plays a crucial role in terms of stability, the economy, and the environmental friendliness of the energy supply. However, price volatility, supply chain complexity, and strengthened environmental regulations are certain challenges faced by this industry. In this study, we intend to overcome these challenges by elucidating the application of digital twin technology and by improving the performance of the prediction models in the gas industry. The real-time data and simulation-based predictions of pressure fluctuations were integrated in terms of pressure control equipment. We determined the contribution of this data integration to enhancing the operational efficiency, safety, and sustainable development in the gas industry. The summary of the results highlights the superior predictive performance of the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) model. It exhibited the best performance across all evaluation indices—mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), root mean square error (RMSE), and the coefficient of determination (R 2 )—when compared with the raw data. Specifically, the ARIMA model demonstrated the lowest RMSE value of 0.01575, the lowest MAPE value of 0.00609, and the highest R 2 value of 0.94993 among the models evaluated. This indicates that the ARIMA model outperformed the other models in accurately predicting the outcomes. These findings validate that the integration of digital twin technology and prediction models can innovatively improve the maintenance strategy, operational efficiency, and risk prediction in the gas industry. Predictive maintenance models can help prevent significant industrial risks, such as gas leak accidents. Moreover, the integration of digital twin technology and predictive maintenance models can significantly enhance the safety and sustainability in the gas industry. The proposed innovative method of implementing digital twin technology and improved prediction models lays a theoretical foundation for sustainable development that can be applied to other industries with high energy consumption.

Suggested Citation

  • Jaeseok Yun & Sungyeon Kim & Jinmin Kim, 2024. "Digital Twin Technology in the Gas Industry: A Comparative Simulation Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-29, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:5864-:d:1432081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/5864/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/16/14/5864/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Saeid Mehdizadeh, 2020. "Using AR, MA, and ARMA Time Series Models to Improve the Performance of MARS and KNN Approaches in Monthly Precipitation Modeling under Limited Climatic Data," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 34(1), pages 263-282, January.
    2. Ali, Aliyuda & Aliyuda, Kachalla & Elmitwally, Nouh & Muhammad Bello, Abdulwahab, 2022. "Towards more accurate and explainable supervised learning-based prediction of deliverability for underground natural gas storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 327(C).
    3. Zhao, Jun & Jiang, Qingzhe & Dong, Xiucheng & Dong, Kangyin, 2020. "Would environmental regulation improve the greenhouse gas benefits of natural gas use? A Chinese case study," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    4. Gillessen, B. & Heinrichs, H. & Hake, J.-F. & Allelein, H.-J., 2019. "Natural gas as a bridge to sustainability: Infrastructure expansion regarding energy security and system transition," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Chen, Juan & Xiao, Zuoping & Bai, Jiancheng & Guo, Hongling, 2023. "Predicting volatility in natural gas under a cloud of uncertainties," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    6. Fei Shen & Shuang Shuang Ren & Xiang Yang Zhang & Hong Wu Luo & Chao Min Feng, 2021. "A Digital Twin-Based Approach for Optimization and Prediction of Oil and Gas Production," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2021, pages 1-8, September.
    7. Guo, Kun & Liu, Fengqi & Sun, Xiaolei & Zhang, Dayong & Ji, Qiang, 2023. "Predicting natural gas futures’ volatility using climate risks," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 55(PA).
    8. Hailemariam, Abebe & Smyth, Russell, 2019. "What drives volatility in natural gas prices?," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 731-742.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kuang, Hewu & Liang, Yiyan & Zhao, Wenjia & Cai, Jiahong, 2023. "Impact of natural resources and technology on economic development and sustainable environment – Analysis of resources-energy-growth-environment linkages in BRICS," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    2. Zhang, Jiaming & Xiang, Yitian & Zou, Yang & Guo, Songlin, 2024. "Volatility forecasting of Chinese energy market: Which uncertainty have better performance?," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    3. Lu, Xunfa & He, Pengchao & Zhang, Zhengjun & Apergis, Nicholas & Roubaud, David, 2024. "Extreme co-movements between decomposed oil price shocks and sustainable investments," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    4. Chen, Shengming & Bouteska, Ahmed & Sharif, Taimur & Abedin, Mohammad Zoynul, 2023. "The Russia–Ukraine war and energy market volatility: A novel application of the volatility ratio in the context of natural gas," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PA).
    5. He, Youwei & Wang, Ning & Tang, Yong & Tang, Liangrui & He, Zhiyue & Rui, Zhenhua, 2024. "Formation-water evaporation and salt precipitation mechanism in porous media under movable water conditions in underground gas storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 286(C).
    6. Zhao, Jun & Shahbaz, Muhammad & Dong, Kangyin, 2022. "How does energy poverty eradication promote green growth in China? The role of technological innovation," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    7. Magazzino, Cosimo & Mele, Marco & Schneider, Nicolas, 2021. "A D2C algorithm on the natural gas consumption and economic growth: Challenges faced by Germany and Japan," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    8. Liu, Qian & Li, Wanjun & Zhao, Zhen & Jian, Gan, 2024. "Optimal operation of coordinated multi-carrier energy hubs for integrated electricity and gas networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 288(C).
    9. Kangyin Dong & Yalin Han & Yue Dou & Muhammad Shahbaz, 2022. "Moving toward carbon neutrality: Assessing natural gas import security and its impact on CO2 emissions," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 30(4), pages 751-770, August.
    10. Gurbanov, Sarvar, 2021. "Role of Natural Gas Consumption in the Reduction of CO₂ Emissions: Case of Azerbaijan," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 14(22).
    11. Wang, Xiong & Wang, Xiao & Ren, Xiaohang & Wen, Fenghua, 2022. "Can digital financial inclusion affect CO2 emissions of China at the prefecture level? Evidence from a spatial econometric approach," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    12. Fei Yang & Chunchen Wang, 2023. "Clean energy, emission trading policy, and CO2 emissions: Evidence from China," Energy & Environment, , vol. 34(5), pages 1657-1673, August.
    13. Dong, Kangyin & Dong, Xiucheng & Jiang, Qingzhe & Zhao, Jun, 2021. "Assessing energy resilience and its greenhouse effect: A global perspective," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    14. Zhang, Hua & Chen, Jinyu & Shao, Liuguo, 2021. "Dynamic spillovers between energy and stock markets and their implications in the context of COVID-19," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 77(C).
    15. Fuzhong Chen & Guohai Jiang & Kangyin Dong, 2022. "How do FDI inflows curvilinearly affect carbon emissions? Threshold effects of energy service availability and cleanliness," Australian Economic Papers, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 61(4), pages 798-824, December.
    16. Liang, Chao & Xia, Zhenglan & Lai, Xiaodong & Wang, Lu, 2022. "Natural gas volatility prediction: Fresh evidence from extreme weather and extended GARCH-MIDAS-ES model," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    17. Naeem, Muhammad Abubakr & Arfaoui, Nadia, 2023. "Exploring downside risk dependence across energy markets: Electricity, conventional energy, carbon, and clean energy during episodes of market crises," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 127(PB).
    18. Bharat Kumar Meher & Iqbal Thonse Hawaldar & Mathew Thomas Gil & Deebom Zorle Dum, 2021. "Measuring Leverage Effect of Covid 19 on Stock Price Volatility of Energy Companies Using High Frequency Data," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 11(6), pages 489-502.
    19. Rao, Amar & Dev, Dhairya & Kharbanda, Aeshna & Parihar, Jaya Singh & Sala, Dariusz, 2024. "Mineral policy and sustainable development goals: Volatility forecasting in the Global South's minerals market," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    20. Yang, Zhihao & Hong, Junjie & Wang, Xuan, 2022. "Environmental spillovers in international joint ventures: Evidence from Chinese industrial firms," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jsusta:v:16:y:2024:i:14:p:5864-:d:1432081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.