IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v158y2022ics1364032122000168.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Upscaling scenarios for ocean thermal energy conversion with technological learning in Indonesia and their global relevance

Author

Listed:
  • Langer, Jannis
  • Quist, Jaco
  • Blok, Kornelis

Abstract

Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) is a promising renewable energy technology that is the most economical at large scale. But contemporary literature does not address how OTEC could reach such scale with current technology, and what the techno-economic impact of location-dependent factors and technological learning are. This paper tackles these issues by simulating OTEC's upscaling with a model that implements OTEC to meet local electricity demand and extrapolates to the global relevance of OTEC. The model uses a learning rate for investment costs and cost of finance. This study shows that up to 45 GW of OTEC capacity can be installed in Indonesia with national demand coverage of 22% in 2050. Even with small cost reduction rates, OTEC could be profitable and cost-competitive against other power generation technologies with an aggregated Net Present Value (NPV) of up to US$ 23 billion. OTEC's upscaling could be funded via state budget reallocation or international financial institutions, e.g. via the feed-in tariff suggested in the paper. However, large-scale OTEC is only feasible in regions with high electricity demand and until that size is reached, upscaling must be coordinated globally, e.g. with the proposed upscaling strategy. To contribute to the global energy transition, OTEC needs to grow by 28% per year, a rate similar to wind power and solar PV. This paper provides good reasons to fight for the attention of global decision makers and future research could focus on refining the concepts of this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Langer, Jannis & Quist, Jaco & Blok, Kornelis, 2022. "Upscaling scenarios for ocean thermal energy conversion with technological learning in Indonesia and their global relevance," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:158:y:2022:i:c:s1364032122000168
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2022.112086
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032122000168
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112086?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Langer, Jannis & Quist, Jaco & Blok, Kornelis, 2020. "Recent progress in the economics of ocean thermal energy conversion: Critical review and research agenda," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    2. Vazquez, A. & Iglesias, G., 2015. "LCOE (levelised cost of energy) mapping: A new geospatial tool for tidal stream energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 192-201.
    3. Vinhoza, Amanda & Schaeffer, Roberto, 2021. "Brazil's offshore wind energy potential assessment based on a Spatial Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 146(C).
    4. Rodrigues, S. & Restrepo, C. & Kontos, E. & Teixeira Pinto, R. & Bauer, P., 2015. "Trends of offshore wind projects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 1114-1135.
    5. Asian Development Bank (ADB), 2014. "Wave Energy Conversion and Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion Potential in Developing Member Countries," ADB Reports RPT146488-3, Asian Development Bank (ADB), revised 01 Jul 2014.
    6. Steffen, Bjarne, 2020. "Estimating the cost of capital for renewable energy projects," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    7. Florian Egli & Bjarne Steffen & Tobias S. Schmidt, 2018. "A dynamic analysis of financing conditions for renewable energy technologies," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 3(12), pages 1084-1092, December.
    8. Hong, Soonpa & Yang, Taeyong & Chang, Hyun Joon & Hong, Sungjun, 2020. "The effect of switching renewable energy support systems on grid parity for photovoltaics: Analysis using a learning curve model," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    9. Dornan, Matthew, 2014. "Access to electricity in Small Island Developing States of the Pacific: Issues and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 726-735.
    10. Osorio, Andrés F. & Arias-Gaviria, Jessica & Devis-Morales, Andrea & Acevedo, Diego & Velasquez, Héctor Iván & Arango-Aramburo, Santiago, 2016. "Beyond electricity: The potential of ocean thermal energy and ocean technology ecoparks in small tropical islands," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 713-724.
    11. Maulidia, Martha & Dargusch, Paul & Ashworth, Peta & Ardiansyah, Fitrian, 2019. "Rethinking renewable energy targets and electricity sector reform in Indonesia: A private sector perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 231-247.
    12. Schallenberg-Rodríguez, Julieta & García Montesdeoca, Nuria, 2018. "Spatial planning to estimate the offshore wind energy potential in coastal regions and islands. Practical case: The Canary Islands," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 91-103.
    13. Bernardoni, C. & Binotti, M. & Giostri, A., 2019. "Techno-economic analysis of closed OTEC cycles for power generation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1018-1033.
    14. Rajagopalan, Krishnakumar & Nihous, Gérard C., 2013. "Estimates of global Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) resources using an ocean general circulation model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 532-540.
    15. Junginger, M. & Faaij, A. & Turkenburg, W. C., 2005. "Global experience curves for wind farms," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 133-150, January.
    16. Wei, Max & Smith, Sarah Josephine & Sohn, Michael D., 2017. "Non-constant learning rates in retrospective experience curve analyses and their correlation to deployment programs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 356-369.
    17. Rubin, Edward S. & Azevedo, Inês M.L. & Jaramillo, Paulina & Yeh, Sonia, 2015. "A review of learning rates for electricity supply technologies," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 198-218.
    18. Langer, Jannis & Cahyaningwidi, Aida Astuti & Chalkiadakis, Charis & Quist, Jaco & Hoes, Olivier & Blok, Kornelis, 2021. "Plant siting and economic potential of ocean thermal energy conversion in Indonesia a novel GIS-based methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    19. Abidah B. Setyowati, 2020. "Mitigating Energy Poverty: Mobilizing Climate Finance to Manage the Energy Trilemma in Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-18, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Hu, Zheng & Chen, Yongping & Zhang, Chengbin, 2024. "Role of R717 blends in ocean thermal energy conversion organic Rankine cycle," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    2. Trivedi, Ashish & Trivedi, Vibha & Pandey, Krishan Kumar & Chichi, Ouissal, 2023. "An interpretive model to assess the barriers to ocean energy toward blue economic development in India," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C), pages 822-830.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Langer, Jannis & Cahyaningwidi, Aida Astuti & Chalkiadakis, Charis & Quist, Jaco & Hoes, Olivier & Blok, Kornelis, 2021. "Plant siting and economic potential of ocean thermal energy conversion in Indonesia a novel GIS-based methodology," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    2. Langer, Jannis & Quist, Jaco & Blok, Kornelis, 2020. "Recent progress in the economics of ocean thermal energy conversion: Critical review and research agenda," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    3. Langer, Jannis & Infante Ferreira, Carlos & Quist, Jaco, 2022. "Is bigger always better? Designing economically feasible ocean thermal energy conversion systems using spatiotemporal resource data," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 309(C).
    4. Jannis Langer & Jaco Quist & Kornelis Blok, 2021. "Review of Renewable Energy Potentials in Indonesia and Their Contribution to a 100% Renewable Electricity System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-21, October.
    5. Philipp Beiter & Aubryn Cooperman & Eric Lantz & Tyler Stehly & Matt Shields & Ryan Wiser & Thomas Telsnig & Lena Kitzing & Volker Berkhout & Yuka Kikuchi, 2021. "Wind power costs driven by innovation and experience with further reductions on the horizon," Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 10(5), September.
    6. Gunther Glenk & Rebecca Meier & Stefan Reichelstein, 2021. "Cost Dynamics of Clean Energy Technologies," Schmalenbach Journal of Business Research, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 179-206, June.
    7. Glenk, Gunther & Meier, Rebecca & Reichelstein, Stefan, 2021. "Cost dynamics of clean energy technologies," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-054, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    8. Emanuele Campiglio & Alessandro Spiganti & Anthony Wiskich, 2023. "Clean innovation and heterogeneous financing costs," Working Papers 2023: 07, Department of Economics, University of Venice "Ca' Foscari".
    9. Glenk, Gunther & Reichelstein, Stefan, 2021. "Intermittent versus dispatchable power sources: An integrated competitive assessment," ZEW Discussion Papers 21-065, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    10. Schauf, Magnus & Schwenen, Sebastian, 2021. "Mills of progress grind slowly? Estimating learning rates for onshore wind energy," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    11. Friedemann Polzin & Mark Sanders & Bjarne Steffen & Florian Egli & Tobias S. Schmidt & Panagiotis Karkatsoulis & Panagiotis Fragkos & Leonidas Paroussos, 2021. "The effect of differentiating costs of capital by country and technology on the European energy transition," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 1-21, July.
    12. Hall, Kashawn & Kelly, Solange & Henry, Legena, 2022. "Site selection of Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion (OTEC) plants for Barbados," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(P2), pages 60-69.
    13. Paul Kerr & Donald R. Noble & Jonathan Hodges & Henry Jeffrey, 2021. "Implementing Radical Innovation in Renewable Energy Experience Curves," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-28, April.
    14. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua, 2022. "Investigation of the potential of R717 blends as working fluids in the organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for ocean thermal energy conversion (OTEC)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    15. Martinez, A. & Iglesias, G., 2022. "Mapping of the levelised cost of energy for floating offshore wind in the European Atlantic," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    16. Emanuele Campiglio & Alessandro Spiganti & Anthony Wiskich, 2023. "Clean Innovation, Heterogeneous Financing Costs, and the Optimal Climate Policy Mix," CAMA Working Papers 2023-25, Centre for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis, Crawford School of Public Policy, The Australian National University, revised May 2024.
    17. Kostas Fragkiadakis & Panagiotis Fragkos & Leonidas Paroussos, 2020. "Low-Carbon R&D Can Boost EU Growth and Competitiveness," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-29, October.
    18. Gumber, Anurag & Zana, Riccardo & Steffen, Bjarne, 2024. "A global analysis of renewable energy project commissioning timelines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    19. Polzin, Friedemann & Sanders, Mark & Serebriakova, Alexandra, 2021. "Finance in global transition scenarios: Mapping investments by technology into finance needs by source," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    20. Samadi, Sascha, 2018. "The experience curve theory and its application in the field of electricity generation technologies – A literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 82(P3), pages 2346-2364.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:158:y:2022:i:c:s1364032122000168. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.