IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v157y2022ics1364032121013307.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A review of technologies for in-situ sulfide control in anaerobic digestion

Author

Listed:
  • Jung, Heejung
  • Kim, Danbee
  • Choi, Hyungmin
  • Lee, Changsoo

Abstract

The generation of toxic, malodorous, and corrosive hydrogen sulfide (H2S), which can cause serious hygiene and health problems and damage biogas plants, is inevitable in anaerobic digestion (AD) of organic waste. H2S is directly toxic to different microorganisms involved in AD, and sulfidogenesis competitively inhibits methanogenesis. Many technologies for ex-situ and in-situ sulfide removal have been developed for biogas cleaning. In-situ technologies that control sulfide within digesters do not require separate facilities and thus are more convenient and economical than ex-situ technologies. However, in-situ sulfide control during AD is directly affected by digester operating conditions and environmental factors, complicating its effective operation and leads to suboptimal performance. This paper reviews the principles, advantages, and disadvantages of different in-situ sulfide control technologies, from conventional to state-of-the-art. Although conventional technologies are technically simple and effective, their large-scale application has practical limitations related to high energy and chemical consumption and the need for sophisticated operation of digesters. Recently, several advanced technologies with promising potential have been developed to overcome these limitations, although there is still a long way to go for their practical application. In addition to better performance, the advanced technologies provide attractive possibilities to improve the economic feasibility for large-scale application by regenerating and recycling valuable materials and/or recovering elemental sulfur (S0). Sulfide control is critical not only for biogas cleaning but also for stable digester operation, and it is receiving increasing attention as the importance of AD as an alternative energy source is growing. Given the increasing demand for more sustainable biogas production and upgrading, more research is needed to evaluate and improve the practical applicability of the advanced in-situ sulfide control technologies in anaerobic digester environments, particularly at large scale. This review also discusses the key challenges for their practical application and suggests future research directions.

Suggested Citation

  • Jung, Heejung & Kim, Danbee & Choi, Hyungmin & Lee, Changsoo, 2022. "A review of technologies for in-situ sulfide control in anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:157:y:2022:i:c:s1364032121013307
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.112068
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032121013307
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2021.112068?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kim, Jinsu & Baek, Gahyun & Kim, Jaai & Lee, Changsoo, 2019. "Energy production from different organic wastes by anaerobic co-digestion: Maximizing methane yield versus maximizing synergistic effect," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 683-690.
    2. Shen, Yanwen & Linville, Jessica L. & Urgun-Demirtas, Meltem & Schoene, Robin P. & Snyder, Seth W., 2015. "Producing pipeline-quality biomethane via anaerobic digestion of sludge amended with corn stover biochar with in-situ CO2 removal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 300-309.
    3. Phuc T. Ha & Stephen R. Lindemann & Liang Shi & Alice C. Dohnalkova & James K. Fredrickson & Michael T. Madigan & Haluk Beyenal, 2017. "Syntrophic anaerobic photosynthesis via direct interspecies electron transfer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 8(1), pages 1-7, April.
    4. Byung-Kyu Ahn & Tae-Hoon Kim & Jiyun Seon & Seung-Kyun Park & Yeo-Myeong Yun, 2021. "Mill Scale Addition to Reduce Hydrogen Sulfide Production in Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-8, October.
    5. Shawn E. McGlynn & Grayson L. Chadwick & Christopher P. Kempes & Victoria J. Orphan, 2015. "Single cell activity reveals direct electron transfer in methanotrophic consortia," Nature, Nature, vol. 526(7574), pages 531-535, October.
    6. Gahyun Baek & Jaai Kim & Jinsu Kim & Changsoo Lee, 2018. "Role and Potential of Direct Interspecies Electron Transfer in Anaerobic Digestion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-18, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Logan, Mohanakrishnan & Tan, Lea Chua & Nzeteu, Corine Orline & Lens, Piet N.L., 2023. "Effect of selenate on treatment of glycerol containing wastewater in UASB reactors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 97-110.
    2. Giangeri, Ginevra & Tsapekos, Panagiotis & Gaspari, Maria & Ghofrani-Isfahani, Parisa & Treu, Laura & Kougias, Panagiotis & Campanaro, Stefano & Angelidaki, Irini, 2024. "A bioaugmentation strategy to recover methane production under sulfate-stressed conditions: Highlights on targeted sulfate-reducing bacteria and DIET-related species," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 362(C).
    3. Robert Czubaszek & Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek & Aneta Sienkiewicz & Alicja Piotrowska-Niczyporuk & Martin J. Wassen & Andrzej Bajguz, 2024. "Possibilities of Utilising Biomass Collected from Road Verges to Produce Biogas and Biodiesel," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-21, April.
    4. Robert Czubaszek & Agnieszka Wysocka-Czubaszek & Piotr Banaszuk, 2022. "Importance of Feedstock in a Small-Scale Agricultural Biogas Plant," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-19, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Lei & Xu, Ying & Dai, Xiaohu & Dai, Lingling, 2021. "Principles and advancements in improving anaerobic digestion of organic waste via direct interspecies electron transfer," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    2. Abbas, Yasir & Yun, Sining & Wang, Ziqi & Zhang, Yongwei & Zhang, Xianmei & Wang, Kaijun, 2021. "Recent advances in bio-based carbon materials for anaerobic digestion: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    3. Wang, Zixin & Wang, Tengfei & Si, Buchun & Watson, Jamison & Zhang, Yuanhui, 2021. "Accelerating anaerobic digestion for methane production: Potential role of direct interspecies electron transfer," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    4. Chiappero, Marco & Norouzi, Omid & Hu, Mingyu & Demichelis, Francesca & Berruti, Franco & Di Maria, Francesco & Mašek, Ondřej & Fiore, Silvia, 2020. "Review of biochar role as additive in anaerobic digestion processes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    5. Qiu, L. & Deng, Y.F. & Wang, F. & Davaritouchaee, M. & Yao, Y.Q., 2019. "A review on biochar-mediated anaerobic digestion with enhanced methane recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    6. Yan, Yixin & Yan, Miao & Ravenni, Giulia & Angelidaki, Irini & Fu, Dafang & Fotidis, Ioannis A., 2022. "Biochar enhanced bioaugmentation provides long-term tolerance under increasing ammonia toxicity in continuous biogas reactors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 590-597.
    7. Roopnarain, Ashira & Rama, Haripriya & Ndaba, Busiswa & Bello-Akinosho, Maryam & Bamuza-Pemu, Emomotimi & Adeleke, Rasheed, 2021. "Unravelling the anaerobic digestion ‘black box’: Biotechnological approaches for process optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    8. Khan, Mohd Atiqueuzzaman & Ngo, Huu Hao & Guo, Wenshan & Liu, Yiwen & Zhang, Xinbo & Guo, Jianbo & Chang, Soon Woong & Nguyen, Dinh Duc & Wang, Jie, 2018. "Biohydrogen production from anaerobic digestion and its potential as renewable energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 129(PB), pages 754-768.
    9. Zhou, Yixuan & Su, Xianbo & Zhao, Weizhong & Wang, Lufei & Fu, Haijiao, 2023. "Enhanced coal biomethanation by microbial electrolysis and graphene in the anaerobic digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P2).
    10. Khan, Muhammad Usman & Lee, Jonathan Tian En & Bashir, Muhammad Aamir & Dissanayake, Pavani Dulanja & Ok, Yong Sik & Tong, Yen Wah & Shariati, Mohammad Ali & Wu, Sarah & Ahring, Birgitte Kiaer, 2021. "Current status of biogas upgrading for direct biomethane use: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    11. Soha, Tamás & Papp, Luca & Csontos, Csaba & Munkácsy, Béla, 2021. "The importance of high crop residue demand on biogas plant site selection, scaling and feedstock allocation – A regional scale concept in a Hungarian study area," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    12. Dae-Yeol Cheong & Jeffrey Todd Harvey & Jinsu Kim & Changsoo Lee, 2019. "Improving Biomethanation of Chicken Manure by Co-Digestion with Ethanol Plant Effluent," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-10, December.
    13. Alberto Benato & Alarico Macor, 2019. "Italian Biogas Plants: Trend, Subsidies, Cost, Biogas Composition and Engine Emissions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-31, March.
    14. Chen, Miao & Liu, Shujun & Yuan, Xufeng & Li, Qing X. & Wang, Fengzhong & Xin, Fengjiao & Wen, Boting, 2021. "Methane production and characteristics of the microbial community in the co-digestion of potato pulp waste and dairy manure amended with biochar," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 357-367.
    15. Scott A. Klasek & Wei-Li Hong & Marta E. Torres & Stella Ross & Katelyn Hostetler & Alexey Portnov & Friederike Gründger & Frederick S. Colwell, 2021. "Distinct methane-dependent biogeochemical states in Arctic seafloor gas hydrate mounds," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Yuhan Zhang & Yongbin Wang & Zhibin Chen & Chengzhi Hu & Jiuhui Qu, 2024. "Recovering nutrients and unblocking the cake layer of an electrochemical anaerobic membrane bioreactor," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-11, December.
    17. Rotunno, Paolo & Lanzini, Andrea & Leone, Pierluigi, 2017. "Energy and economic analysis of a water scrubbing based biogas upgrading process for biomethane injection into the gas grid or use as transportation fuel," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(PB), pages 417-432.
    18. Agnieszka Kasprzycka & Jan Kuna, 2018. "Methodical Aspects of Biogas Production in Small-Volume Bioreactors in Laboratory Investigations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(6), pages 1-10, May.
    19. Martin Černý & Monika Vítězová & Tomáš Vítěz & Milan Bartoš & Ivan Kushkevych, 2018. "Variation in the Distribution of Hydrogen Producers from the Clostridiales Order in Biogas Reactors Depending on Different Input Substrates," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-10, November.
    20. Rivera-Hernández, Yessica & Hernández-Eugenio, Guadalupe & Balagurusamy, Nagamani & Espinosa-Solares, Teodoro, 2022. "Sargassum-pig manure co-digestion: An alternative for bioenergy production and treating a polluting coastal waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 1336-1344.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:157:y:2022:i:c:s1364032121013307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.