IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/appene/v362y2024ics0306261924003234.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A bioaugmentation strategy to recover methane production under sulfate-stressed conditions: Highlights on targeted sulfate-reducing bacteria and DIET-related species

Author

Listed:
  • Giangeri, Ginevra
  • Tsapekos, Panagiotis
  • Gaspari, Maria
  • Ghofrani-Isfahani, Parisa
  • Treu, Laura
  • Kougias, Panagiotis
  • Campanaro, Stefano
  • Angelidaki, Irini

Abstract

Bioaugmentation has been recognized as a key strategy to improve the anaerobic digestion efficiency in organic waste treatment. Methanosarcina barkeri possesses direct interspecies electron transfer capability, a characteristic that allows it to outcompete other unwanted species such as sulfate-reducing bacteria. This study investigated the effects of bioaugmentation with Methanosarcina barkeri DSM800 on two continuous-stirred tank reactors fed with a sulfate-rich feedstock. One of the two reactors was supplemented with magnetite to facilitate direct interspecies electron transfer. Time series quantitative polymerase chain reactions were performed to evaluate the absolute abundance of crucial species, including the augmented Methanosarcina. Results showed increased and stabilized methane production of 22% and 21% in the reactor amended with magnetite and in the control reactor, respectively. Moreover, volatile fatty acids were almost completely consumed in the magnetite-supplemented reactor. The quantitative polymerase chain reaction was used to analyze the abundance of targeted species in response to bioaugmentation. Specifically, Methanosarcina barkeri was not retained in either reactor after one hydraulic retention time. Direct interspecies electron transfer-associated microorganisms showed opposite trends in the two reactors, highlighting the different interactions with Methanosarcina barkeri in the presence and absence of magnetite. Sulfate-reducing bacteria following the dissimilatory sulfate reduction pathway exhibited an opposite behavior in the reactor amended with magnetite, in contrast to those employing the assimilatory sulfate reduction pathway. Overall, the study demonstrated that bioaugmentation with exogenous archaea can considerably alter the microbial community, but the introduced species is not able to establish itself in a stable microbiome. In addition, the strategy could be further tested to control H2S production in real-world waste treatment scenarios. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction proved to be a useful tool for monitoring changes in the absolute abundance of microorganisms in bioreactors, implementing effective monitoring and control strategies to improve overall system performance.

Suggested Citation

  • Giangeri, Ginevra & Tsapekos, Panagiotis & Gaspari, Maria & Ghofrani-Isfahani, Parisa & Treu, Laura & Kougias, Panagiotis & Campanaro, Stefano & Angelidaki, Irini, 2024. "A bioaugmentation strategy to recover methane production under sulfate-stressed conditions: Highlights on targeted sulfate-reducing bacteria and DIET-related species," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 362(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:362:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924003234
    DOI: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122940
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306261924003234
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122940?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tsapekos, P. & Kougias, P.G. & Treu, L. & Campanaro, S. & Angelidaki, I., 2017. "Process performance and comparative metagenomic analysis during co-digestion of manure and lignocellulosic biomass for biogas production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P1), pages 126-135.
    2. Aguilar-Moreno, Guadalupe Stefanny & Navarro-Cerón, Elizabeth & Velázquez-Hernández, Azucena & Hernández-Eugenio, Guadalupe & Aguilar-Méndez, Miguel Ángel & Espinosa-Solares, Teodoro, 2020. "Enhancing methane yield of chicken litter in anaerobic digestion using magnetite nanoparticles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 204-213.
    3. Gemma Reguera & Kevin D. McCarthy & Teena Mehta & Julie S. Nicoll & Mark T. Tuominen & Derek R. Lovley, 2005. "Extracellular electron transfer via microbial nanowires," Nature, Nature, vol. 435(7045), pages 1098-1101, June.
    4. Jung, Heejung & Kim, Danbee & Choi, Hyungmin & Lee, Changsoo, 2022. "A review of technologies for in-situ sulfide control in anaerobic digestion," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 157(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Luz, Fábio Codignole & Cordiner, Stefano & Manni, Alessandro & Mulone, Vincenzo & Rocco, Vittorio, 2017. "Anaerobic digestion of coffee grounds soluble fraction at laboratory scale: Evaluation of the biomethane potential," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C), pages 166-175.
    2. Roopnarain, Ashira & Rama, Haripriya & Ndaba, Busiswa & Bello-Akinosho, Maryam & Bamuza-Pemu, Emomotimi & Adeleke, Rasheed, 2021. "Unravelling the anaerobic digestion ‘black box’: Biotechnological approaches for process optimization," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    3. Yuming Wang & Yi Li & Longfei Wang & Wenlong Zhang & Thomas Bürgi, 2023. "Bio-Coated Graphitic Carbon Nitrides for Enhanced Nitrobenzene Degradation: Roles of Extracellular Electron Transfer," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-16, November.
    4. Renata Toczyłowska-Mamińska & Mariusz Ł. Mamiński, 2022. "Wastewater as a Renewable Energy Source—Utilisation of Microbial Fuel Cell Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-14, September.
    5. Zhou, Yixuan & Su, Xianbo & Zhao, Weizhong & Wang, Lufei & Fu, Haijiao, 2023. "Enhanced coal biomethanation by microbial electrolysis and graphene in the anaerobic digestion," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 219(P2).
    6. Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Sarsaiya, Surendra & Wainaina, Steven & Rajendran, Karthik & Kumar, Sumit & Quan, Wang & Duan, Yumin & Awasthi, Sanjeev Kumar & Chen, Hongyu & Pandey, Ashok & Zhang, Zengqiang , 2019. "A critical review of organic manure biorefinery models toward sustainable circular bioeconomy: Technological challenges, advancements, innovations, and future perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 115-131.
    7. Liu, Yuanzhe & Lai, Yen-Jung Sean & Rittmann, Bruce E., 2020. "Increased anode respiration enhances utilization of short-chain fatty acid and lipid wet-extraction from Scenedesmus acutus biomass in electro-selective fermentation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 374-379.
    8. ElMekawy, Ahmed & Hegab, Hanaa M. & Losic, Dusan & Saint, Christopher P. & Pant, Deepak, 2017. "Applications of graphene in microbial fuel cells: The gap between promise and reality," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 1389-1403.
    9. Grosser, Anna & Grobelak, Anna & Rorat, Agnieszka & Courtois, Pauline & Vandenbulcke, Franck & Lemière, Sébastien & Guyoneaud, Remy & Attard, Eleonore & Celary, Piotr, 2021. "Effects of silver nanoparticles on performance of anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge and associated microbial communities," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1014-1025.
    10. Shen, Liang & Zhao, Qingchuan & Wu, Xuee & Li, Xiangzhen & Li, Qingbiao & Wang, Yuanpeng, 2016. "Interspecies electron transfer in syntrophic methanogenic consortia: From cultures to bioreactors," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 1358-1367.
    11. Xianshu Liu & Jie Ding & Nanqi Ren & Qingyue Tong & Luyan Zhang, 2016. "The Detoxification and Degradation of Benzothiazole from the Wastewater in Microbial Electrolysis Cells," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-12, December.
    12. Paweł P. Włodarczyk & Barbara Włodarczyk, 2018. "Microbial Fuel Cell with Ni–Co Cathode Powered with Yeast Wastewater," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(11), pages 1-9, November.
    13. Wang, Zixin & Wang, Tengfei & Si, Buchun & Watson, Jamison & Zhang, Yuanhui, 2021. "Accelerating anaerobic digestion for methane production: Potential role of direct interspecies electron transfer," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    14. Rivera-Hernández, Yessica & Hernández-Eugenio, Guadalupe & Balagurusamy, Nagamani & Espinosa-Solares, Teodoro, 2022. "Sargassum-pig manure co-digestion: An alternative for bioenergy production and treating a polluting coastal waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 199(C), pages 1336-1344.
    15. Xiao, Shuai & Fu, Qian & Li, Zhuo & Li, Jun & Zhang, Liang & Zhu, Xun & Liao, Qiang, 2021. "Solar-driven biological inorganic hybrid systems for the production of solar fuels and chemicals from carbon dioxide," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    16. Bhatnagar, N. & Ryan, D. & Murphy, R. & Enright, A.M., 2022. "A comprehensive review of green policy, anaerobic digestion of animal manure and chicken litter feedstock potential – Global and Irish perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    17. Kadier, Abudukeremu & Kalil, Mohd Sahaid & Abdeshahian, Peyman & Chandrasekhar, K. & Mohamed, Azah & Azman, Nadia Farhana & Logroño, Washington & Simayi, Yibadatihan & Hamid, Aidil Abdul, 2016. "Recent advances and emerging challenges in microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) for microbial production of hydrogen and value-added chemicals," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 501-525.
    18. Jieni Fu & Weidong Zhu & Xiangmei Liu & Chunyong Liang & Yufeng Zheng & Zhaoyang Li & Yanqin Liang & Dong Zheng & Shengli Zhu & Zhenduo Cui & Shuilin Wu, 2021. "Self-activating anti-infection implant," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    19. Marta Wiśniewska & Andrzej Kulig & Krystyna Lelicińska-Serafin, 2021. "Odour Nuisance at Municipal Waste Biogas Plants and the Effect of Feedstock Modification on the Circular Economy—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-22, October.
    20. Hassan, Sedky H.A. & el Nasser A. Zohri, Abd & Kassim, Rehab M.F., 2019. "Electricity generation from sugarcane molasses using microbial fuel cell technologies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 538-543.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:appene:v:362:y:2024:i:c:s0306261924003234. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/405891/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.