IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v156y2022ics1364032121011916.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bioprocesses for resource recovery from waste gases: Current trends and industrial applications

Author

Listed:
  • Khanongnuch, Ramita
  • Abubackar, Haris Nalakath
  • Keskin, Tugba
  • Gungormusler, Mine
  • Duman, Gozde
  • Aggarwal, Ayushi
  • Behera, Shishir Kumar
  • Li, Lu
  • Bayar, Büşra
  • Rene, Eldon R.

Abstract

Air pollution is a topic of important global concern because it has contributed significantly to an increase in the earth's global warming potential and contributed to severe health and environmental impacts. In this review, the different bioreactor configurations commonly used for waste gas treatment, namely the biofilters, the biotrickling filters and the bioscrubbers, and their industrial applications were compared in terms of the type of inoculum, the packing material/media, removal efficiency and elimination capacity. Typically, biofilters are operated under the following range of operating conditions: gas residence time = 15–60 s; gas flow rate = 50–300,000 m3 h−1; temperature = 15–30 °C; pH = 6.0–7.5; filter area = 100–3000 m2; relative humidity >95.0%; and removal efficiencies >75.0% depending on the waste gas composition and concentration. The biotechnological approaches for resource recovery, i.e., the conversion of C1 gaseous compounds (CO, CO2 and CH4) to liquified value-added products or biofuels have been discussed. From this review, it was evident that the performances of different aerobic, anoxic and/or anaerobic lab, pilot and full-scale bioreactors for waste gas treatment and resource recovery depend on the composition, the individual concentration of pollutants present in the waste gas and the gas flow rate. Although most of the research on product recovery from waste gas is rather limited to lab/pilot-scale studies, there are some key commercialized technologies that have proven to be economical at the full-scale. Thus, this review, comprehensively presents a complete overview of the current trends and limitations of conventional waste gas treatment systems, the benefits of novel bioreactor configurations and their potential to be applied for resource recovery from waste gases.

Suggested Citation

  • Khanongnuch, Ramita & Abubackar, Haris Nalakath & Keskin, Tugba & Gungormusler, Mine & Duman, Gozde & Aggarwal, Ayushi & Behera, Shishir Kumar & Li, Lu & Bayar, Büşra & Rene, Eldon R., 2022. "Bioprocesses for resource recovery from waste gases: Current trends and industrial applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:156:y:2022:i:c:s1364032121011916
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2021.111926
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032121011916
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111926?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Shen, Yanwen & Brown, Robert & Wen, Zhiyou, 2014. "Enhancing mass transfer and ethanol production in syngas fermentation of Clostridium carboxidivorans P7 through a monolithic biofilm reactor," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 68-76.
    2. Jiyun Baek & Changman Kim & Young Eun Song & Hyeon Sung Im & Mutyala Sakuntala & Jung Rae Kim, 2018. "Separation of Acetate Produced from C1 Gas Fermentation Using an Electrodialysis-Based Bioelectrochemical System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-12, October.
    3. Sun, Xiao & Atiyeh, Hasan K. & Zhang, Hailin & Tanner, Ralph S. & Huhnke, Raymond L., 2019. "Enhanced ethanol production from syngas by Clostridium ragsdalei in continuous stirred tank reactor using medium with poultry litter biochar," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 1269-1279.
    4. Kong, Fanying & Ren, Hong-Yu & Pavlostathis, Spyros G. & Nan, Jun & Ren, Nan-Qi & Wang, Aijie, 2020. "Overview of value-added products bioelectrosynthesized from waste materials in microbial electrosynthesis systems," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    5. Hanno Richter & Michael E. Martin & Largus T. Angenent, 2013. "A Two-Stage Continuous Fermentation System for Conversion of Syngas into Ethanol," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(8), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Khalid, Azqa & Aslam, Muhammad & Qyyum, Muhammad Abdul & Faisal, Abrar & Khan, Asim Laeeq & Ahmed, Faisal & Lee, Moonyong & Kim, Jeonghwan & Jang, Nulee & Chang, In Seop & Bazmi, Aqeel Ahmed & Yasin, , 2019. "Membrane separation processes for dehydration of bioethanol from fermentation broths: Recent developments, challenges, and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 427-443.
    7. Isabella Pecorini & Elena Rossi & Renato Iannelli, 2020. "Mitigation of Methane, NMVOCs and Odor Emissions in Active and Passive Biofiltration Systems at Municipal Solid Waste Landfills," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-23, April.
    8. Abubackar, Haris Nalakath & Bengelsdorf, Frank R. & Dürre, Peter & Veiga, María C. & Kennes, Christian, 2016. "Improved operating strategy for continuous fermentation of carbon monoxide to fuel-ethanol by clostridia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 210-217.
    9. Shen, Yanwen & Brown, Robert C. & Wen, Zhiyou, 2017. "Syngas fermentation by Clostridium carboxidivorans P7 in a horizontal rotating packed bed biofilm reactor with enhanced ethanol production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 585-594.
    10. Barbosa, Sónia G. & Peixoto, Luciana & Alves, Joana I. & Alves, M. Madalena, 2021. "Bioelectrochemical systems (BESs) towards conversion of carbon monoxide/syngas: A mini-review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 135(C).
    11. Slate, Anthony J. & Whitehead, Kathryn A. & Brownson, Dale A.C. & Banks, Craig E., 2019. "Microbial fuel cells: An overview of current technology," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 60-81.
    12. Monir, Minhaj Uddin & Aziz, Azrina Abd & Khatun, Fatema & Yousuf, Abu, 2020. "Bioethanol production through syngas fermentation in a tar free bioreactor using Clostridium butyricum," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 1116-1123.
    13. Jeeban Poudel & Ja Hyung Choi & Sea Cheon Oh, 2019. "Process Design Characteristics of Syngas (CO/H 2 ) Separation Using Composite Membrane," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Azize Ayol & Luciana Peixoto & Tugba Keskin & Haris Nalakath Abubackar, 2021. "Reactor Designs and Configurations for Biological and Bioelectrochemical C1 Gas Conversion: A Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(21), pages 1-36, November.
    2. Sun, Xiao & Atiyeh, Hasan K. & Zhang, Hailin & Tanner, Ralph S. & Huhnke, Raymond L., 2019. "Enhanced ethanol production from syngas by Clostridium ragsdalei in continuous stirred tank reactor using medium with poultry litter biochar," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 236(C), pages 1269-1279.
    3. Simge Sertkaya & Nuri Azbar & Haris Nalakath Abubackar & Tugba Keskin Gundogdu, 2021. "Design of Low-Cost Ethanol Production Medium from Syngas: An Optimization of Trace Metals for Clostridium ljungdahlii," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Yang, Chunlei & Dong, Lifeng & Gao, Yanhua & Jia, Peng & Diao, Qiyu, 2021. "Engineering acetogens for biofuel production: From cellular biology to process improvement," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    5. Abubackar, Haris Nalakath & Bengelsdorf, Frank R. & Dürre, Peter & Veiga, María C. & Kennes, Christian, 2016. "Improved operating strategy for continuous fermentation of carbon monoxide to fuel-ethanol by clostridia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 210-217.
    6. Marta Pacheco & Patrícia Moura & Carla Silva, 2023. "A Systematic Review of Syngas Bioconversion to Value-Added Products from 2012 to 2022," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-24, April.
    7. Li, Yuping & Tan, Fenghua & Peng, Jiangang & Feng, Mi & Liao, Yuhe & Luo, Weimin & Dong, Kaijun & Long, Jinxing, 2023. "Exergy analysis of alternative configurations of biomass gasification-mixed alcohol production system via catalytic synthesis and fermentation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    8. Gunes, Burcu, 2021. "A critical review on biofilm-based reactor systems for enhanced syngas fermentation processes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    9. Monir, Minhaj Uddin & Aziz, Azrina Abd & Khatun, Fatema & Yousuf, Abu, 2020. "Bioethanol production through syngas fermentation in a tar free bioreactor using Clostridium butyricum," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 1116-1123.
    10. Shahid, Kanwal & Ramasamy, Deepika Lakshmi & Haapasaari, Sampo & Sillanpää, Mika & Pihlajamäki, Arto, 2021. "Stainless steel and carbon brushes as high-performance anodes for energy production and nutrient recovery using the microbial nutrient recovery system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233(C).
    11. Regis, Francesco & Monteverde, Alessandro Hugo Antonio & Fino, Debora, 2023. "A techno-economic assessment of bioethanol production from switchgrass through biomass gasification and syngas fermentation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    12. Konstantinos Chandolias & Enise Pekgenc & Mohammad J. Taherzadeh, 2019. "Floating Membrane Bioreactors with High Gas Hold-Up for Syngas-to-Biomethane Conversion," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-14, March.
    13. Jain, Sanyam & Kumar, Shushil, 2024. "A comprehensive review of bioethanol production from diverse feedstocks: Current advancements and economic perspectives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    14. Zhu, Shengdong & Luo, Fang & Huang, Wenjing & Huang, Wangxiang & Wu, Yuanxin, 2017. "Comparison of three fermentation strategies for alleviating the negative effect of the ionic liquid 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate on lignocellulosic ethanol production," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 124-131.
    15. Hongshen Li & Hongrui Liu & Yufang Li & Jilin Nan & Chen Shi & Shizhong Li, 2021. "Combined Vapor Permeation and Continuous Solid-State Distillation for Energy-Efficient Bioethanol Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, April.
    16. Kaur-Mikk Pehme & Kaja Orupõld & Valdo Kuusemets & Ottar Tamm & Yahya Jani & Toomas Tamm & Mait Kriipsalu, 2020. "Field Study on the Efficiency of a Methane Degradation Layer Composed of Fine Fraction Soil from Landfill Mining," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-16, August.
    17. Liu, Hong-zhou & Chen, Tie-zhu & Wang, Nan & Zhang, Yu-rui & Li, Jian-chang, 2024. "A new strategy for improving MFC power output by shared electrode MFC–MEC coupling," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
    18. Hongshen Li & Hongrui Liu & Shizhong Li, 2021. "Feasibility Study on Bioethanol Production by One Phase Transition Separation Based on Advanced Solid-State Fermentation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-14, October.
    19. Vishal Ahuja & Arvind Kumar Bhatt & Balasubramani Ravindran & Yung-Hun Yang & Shashi Kant Bhatia, 2023. "A Mini-Review on Syngas Fermentation to Bio-Alcohols: Current Status and Challenges," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-21, February.
    20. Joo, Chonghyo & Lee, Jaewon & Kim, Yurim & Cho, Hyungtae & Gu, Boram & Kim, Junghwan, 2024. "A novel on-site SMR process integrated with a hollow fiber membrane module for efficient blue hydrogen production: Modeling, validation, and techno-economic analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 354(PB).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:156:y:2022:i:c:s1364032121011916. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.