IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v134y2020ics1364032120305906.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Environmental comparison of forest biomass residues application in Portugal: Electricity, heat and biofuel

Author

Listed:
  • da Costa, Tamíris Pacheco
  • Quinteiro, Paula
  • Arroja, Luis
  • Dias, Ana Cláudia

Abstract

The Portuguese government's new strategy is based on the predicted increase in the country's installed electricity capacity through the use of biomass residues, including forest biomass residues. However, this strategy implies that the use of forest biomass residues in electricity production will most likely be at the expense of alternative uses, such as heat and biofuel production. Therefore, what is the best use of forest biomass residues available in the country from an environmental perspective? To answer this question, in this study, a consequential life cycle assessment was applied to assess three different scenarios: 1) the production of electricity in dedicated power plants; 2) the cogeneration of electricity and heat in combined heat and power plants; and 3) the production of bioethanol by biochemical conversion. The results showed that the strategy of using forest biomass residues for electricity production would be advantageous in relation to the baseline (i.e. leaving forest residues in forest soil and using fossil fuel sources to produce energy) only in some environmental impact categories. The results showed that the cogeneration of electricity and heat production was the best alternative among the three scenarios. However, regarding the effects related to particulate matter and marine eutrophication, the results showed that this alternative would perform better than baseline if the displaced fuels were coal in electricity production and at least 12% fuel oil (and the rest natural gas) in heat production. The conversion of forest biomass residues to bioethanol was the least beneficial regarding all categories under study.

Suggested Citation

  • da Costa, Tamíris Pacheco & Quinteiro, Paula & Arroja, Luis & Dias, Ana Cláudia, 2020. "Environmental comparison of forest biomass residues application in Portugal: Electricity, heat and biofuel," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 134(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:134:y:2020:i:c:s1364032120305906
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110302
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032120305906
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110302?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Viana, H. & Cohen, Warren B. & Lopes, D. & Aranha, J., 2010. "Assessment of forest biomass for use as energy. GIS-based analysis of geographical availability and locations of wood-fired power plants in Portugal," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 87(8), pages 2551-2560, August.
    2. Njakou Djomo, S. & Witters, N. & Van Dael, M. & Gabrielle, B. & Ceulemans, R., 2015. "Impact of feedstock, land use change, and soil organic carbon on energy and greenhouse gas performance of biomass cogeneration technologies," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 122-130.
    3. Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Shafiei, Marzieh & Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2016. "Biogas and bioethanol production from pinewood pre-treated with steam explosion and N-methylmorpholine-N-oxide (NMMO): A comparative life cycle assessment approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 935-950.
    4. Tarelho, L.A.C. & Teixeira, E.R. & Silva, D.F.R. & Modolo, R.C.E. & Labrincha, J.A. & Rocha, F., 2015. "Characteristics of distinct ash flows in a biomass thermal power plant with bubbling fluidised bed combustor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 387-402.
    5. Cherubini, Francesco, 2010. "GHG balances of bioenergy systems – Overview of key steps in the production chain and methodological concerns," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(7), pages 1565-1573.
    6. Thakur, Amit & Canter, Christina E. & Kumar, Amit, 2014. "Life-cycle energy and emission analysis of power generation from forest biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 246-253.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Siwal, Samarjeet Singh & Zhang, Qibo & Devi, Nishu & Saini, Adesh Kumar & Saini, Vipin & Pareek, Bhawna & Gaidukovs, Sergejs & Thakur, Vijay Kumar, 2021. "Recovery processes of sustainable energy using different biomass and wastes," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    2. Amílcar Díaz-González & Magdalena Yeraldi Perez Luna & Erik Ramírez Morales & Sergio Saldaña-Trinidad & Lizeth Rojas Blanco & Sergio de la Cruz-Arreola & Bianca Yadira Pérez-Sariñana & José Billerman , 2022. "Assessment of the Pretreatments and Bioconversion of Lignocellulosic Biomass Recovered from the Husk of the Cocoa Pod," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-17, May.
    3. Jovet, Yoann & Lefèvre, Frédéric & Laurent, Alexis & Clausse, Marc, 2022. "Combined energetic, economic and climate change assessment of heat pumps for industrial waste heat recovery," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).
    4. Mariana Abreu & Luís Silva & Belina Ribeiro & Alice Ferreira & Luís Alves & Susana M. Paixão & Luísa Gouveia & Patrícia Moura & Florbela Carvalheiro & Luís C. Duarte & Ana Luisa Fernando & Alberto Rei, 2022. "Low Indirect Land Use Change (ILUC) Energy Crops to Bioenergy and Biofuels—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-68, June.
    5. Violeta Motuzienė & Kęstutis Čiuprinskas & Artur Rogoža & Vilūnė Lapinskienė, 2022. "A Review of the Life Cycle Analysis Results for Different Energy Conversion Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-26, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eksi, Guner & Karaosmanoglu, Filiz, 2017. "Combined bioheat and biopower: A technology review and an assessment for Turkey," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 1313-1332.
    2. Vukasinovic, Vladimir & Gordic, Dusan & Zivkovic, Marija & Koncalovic, Davor & Zivkovic, Dubravka, 2019. "Long-term planning methodology for improving wood biomass utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 818-829.
    3. Vukašinović, Vladimir & Gordić, Dušan, 2016. "Optimization and GIS-based combined approach for the determination of the most cost-effective investments in biomass sector," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 250-259.
    4. Sastre, Carlos M. & Carrasco, Juan & Barro, Ruth & González-Arechavala, Yolanda & Maletta, Emiliano & Santos, Ana M. & Ciria, Pilar, 2016. "Improving bioenergy sustainability evaluations by using soil nitrogen balance coupled with life cycle assessment: A case study for electricity generated from rye biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 847-863.
    5. Iriarte, Alfredo & Rieradevall, Joan & Gabarrell, Xavier, 2012. "Transition towards a more environmentally sustainable biodiesel in South America: The case of Chile," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 91(1), pages 263-273.
    6. Mohsen Jamali & Esmaeil Bakhshandeh & Mohammad Yaghoubi Khanghahi & Carmine Crecchio, 2021. "Metadata Analysis to Evaluate Environmental Impacts of Wheat Residues Burning on Soil Quality in Developing and Developed Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-13, June.
    7. Lourinho, Gonçalo & Brito, Paulo, 2015. "Assessment of biomass energy potential in a region of Portugal (Alto Alentejo)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 189-201.
    8. Karami, Kavosh & Karimi, Keikhosro & Mirmohamadsadeghi, Safoora & Kumar, Rajeev, 2022. "Mesophilic aerobic digestion: An efficient and inexpensive biological pretreatment to improve biogas production from highly-recalcitrant pinewood," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PE).
    9. Hernández-Escobedo, Q. & Rodríguez-García, E. & Saldaña-Flores, R. & Fernández-García, A. & Manzano-Agugliaro, F., 2015. "Solar energy resource assessment in Mexican states along the Gulf of Mexico," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 216-238.
    10. Kung, Chih-Chun & Wu, Tao, 2021. "Influence of water allocation on bioenergy production under climate change: A stochastic mathematical programming approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    11. Stanisław Bielski & Renata Marks-Bielska & Anna Zielińska-Chmielewska & Kęstutis Romaneckas & Egidijus Šarauskis, 2021. "Importance of Agriculture in Creating Energy Security—A Case Study of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.
    12. Sacchelli, Sandro & De Meo, Isabella & Paletto, Alessandro, 2013. "Bioenergy production and forest multifunctionality: A trade-off analysis using multiscale GIS model in a case study in Italy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 10-20.
    13. Mobini, Mahdi & Sowlati, Taraneh & Sokhansanj, Shahab, 2011. "Forest biomass supply logistics for a power plant using the discrete-event simulation approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(4), pages 1241-1250, April.
    14. Emmanuel Garbolino & Warren Daniel & Guillermo Hinojos Mendoza, 2018. "Expected Global Warming Impacts on the Spatial Distribution and Productivity for 2050 of Five Species of Trees Used in the Wood Energy Supply Chain in France," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(12), pages 1-17, December.
    15. Viana, H. & Aranha, J. & Lopes, D. & Cohen, Warren B., 2012. "Estimation of crown biomass of Pinus pinaster stands and shrubland above-ground biomass using forest inventory data, remotely sensed imagery and spatial prediction models," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 22-35.
    16. Zhang, Xiaoyue & Huang, Guohe & Liu, Lirong & Li, Kailong, 2022. "Development of a stochastic multistage lifecycle programming model for electric power system planning – A case study for the Province of Saskatchewan, Canada," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    17. Muth, D.J. & Bryden, K.M. & Nelson, R.G., 2013. "Sustainable agricultural residue removal for bioenergy: A spatially comprehensive US national assessment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 403-417.
    18. Kimming, M. & Sundberg, C. & Nordberg, Å. & Hansson, P.-A., 2015. "Vertical integration of local fuel producers into rural district heating systems – Climate impact and production costs," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 51-61.
    19. Monia El Akkari & Nosra Ben Fradj & Benoit Gabrielle & Sylvestre Njakou Djomo, 2023. "Spatially-explicit environmental assessment of bioethanol from miscanthus and switchgrass in France [Évaluation environnementale spatialement explicite du bioéthanol produit à partir de miscanthus ," Post-Print hal-04369771, HAL.
    20. Peter, Christiane & Specka, Xenia & Aurbacher, Joachim & Kornatz, Peter & Herrmann, Christiane & Heiermann, Monika & Müller, Janine & Nendel, Claas, 2017. "The MiLA tool: Modeling greenhouse gas emissions and cumulative energy demand of energy crop cultivation in rotation," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 67-79.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:134:y:2020:i:c:s1364032120305906. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.