IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/rensus/v101y2019icp181-196.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Current trend in offshore wind energy sector and material requirements for fatigue resistance improvement in large wind turbine support structures – A review

Author

Listed:
  • Igwemezie, Victor
  • Mehmanparast, Ali
  • Kolios, Athanasios

Abstract

At present, the UK government is driving the survival of the wind energy industry by using interventions that encourage investment in the sector. The use of a Contract for Difference (CfD)/Strike price model by the UK government supports the wind industry and guarantees that wind energy generators have a stable premium over a period of 15–20 years; however, this may not last forever. The growth and stability of the wind industry will depend essentially on continued reductions in wind energy cost, even below that of fossil-fuel based energy sources. Huge cost reduction beyond the present strike price of £ 57.50/MWh for some projects to be delivered in 2022/2023 may be achieved quickly through efficient and optimized turbine support structure. Consequently, the offshore wind industry is currently making enormous efforts to upscale wind turbines (WTs) from 8 MW to 9.5MW,10MW and then 12 MW HAWT (Horizontal Axis Wind Turbine). This level of upscaling no doubt creates tough challenges because the mass of the turbine increases linearly with the cube of the rotor radius. Monopiles having diameters larger than 7 m have been proposed, with a wall thickness section in the range of 70–110 mm. It is generally thought that Thermo-Mechanical Controlled Process (TMCP) steels are well suited for extra-large (XL-WTs). This paper reviews the present status of WTs and critically assesses the material factors in the structural integrity concerns that may confront the use of XL steel plates in the design of XL-WT support structures.

Suggested Citation

  • Igwemezie, Victor & Mehmanparast, Ali & Kolios, Athanasios, 2019. "Current trend in offshore wind energy sector and material requirements for fatigue resistance improvement in large wind turbine support structures – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 101(C), pages 181-196.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:101:y:2019:i:c:p:181-196
    DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1364032118307342
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.rser.2018.11.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Silvio Rodrigues & Carlos Restrepo & George Katsouris & Rodrigo Teixeira Pinto & Maryam Soleimanzadeh & Peter Bosman & Pavol Bauer, 2016. "A Multi-Objective Optimization Framework for Offshore Wind Farm Layouts and Electric Infrastructures," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-42, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ju, Shen-Haw, 2022. "Increasing the fatigue life of offshore wind turbine jacket structures using yaw stiffness and damping," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    2. Darioush Razmi & Tianguang Lu, 2022. "A Literature Review of the Control Challenges of Distributed Energy Resources Based on Microgrids (MGs): Past, Present and Future," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-21, June.
    3. Martinez, A. & Iglesias, G., 2022. "Mapping of the levelised cost of energy for floating offshore wind in the European Atlantic," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    4. de N Santos, Francisco & D’Antuono, Pietro & Robbelein, Koen & Noppe, Nymfa & Weijtjens, Wout & Devriendt, Christof, 2023. "Long-term fatigue estimation on offshore wind turbines interface loads through loss function physics-guided learning of neural networks," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 205(C), pages 461-474.
    5. Xu, Jiuping & Liu, Tingting, 2020. "Technological paradigm-based approaches towards challenges and policy shifts for sustainable wind energy development," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    6. Akbari, Negar & Jones, Dylan & Treloar, Richard, 2020. "A cross-European efficiency assessment of offshore wind farms: A DEA approach," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 1186-1195.
    7. Wang, L. & Kolios, A. & Liu, X. & Venetsanos, D. & Rui, C., 2022. "Reliability of offshore wind turbine support structures: A state-of-the-art review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    8. Alexandre Mathern & Christoph von der Haar & Steffen Marx, 2021. "Concrete Support Structures for Offshore Wind Turbines: Current Status, Challenges, and Future Trends," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-31, April.
    9. Zeng, Xinmeng & Shao, Yanlin & Feng, Xingya & Xu, Kun & Jin, Ruijia & Li, Huajun, 2024. "Nonlinear hydrodynamics of floating offshore wind turbines: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    10. De Angelis, Paolo & Tuninetti, Marta & Bergamasco, Luca & Calianno, Luca & Asinari, Pietro & Laio, Francesco & Fasano, Matteo, 2021. "Data-driven appraisal of renewable energy potentials for sustainable freshwater production in Africa," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    11. Janusz D. Fidelus & Jacek Puchalski & Anna Trych-Wildner & Michał K. Urbański & Paula Weidinger, 2023. "Estimation of Uncertainty for the Torque Transducer in MNm Range—Classical Approach and Fuzzy Sets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(16), pages 1-20, August.
    12. Zhou, Yuekuan, 2023. "Sustainable energy sharing districts with electrochemical battery degradation in design, planning, operation and multi-objective optimisation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 1324-1341.
    13. Mounir Alliche & Redha Rebhi & Noureddine Kaid & Younes Menni & Houari Ameur & Mustafa Inc & Hijaz Ahmad & Giulio Lorenzini & Ayman A. Aly & Sayed K. Elagan & Bassem F. Felemban, 2021. "Estimation of the Wind Energy Potential in Various North Algerian Regions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-13, November.
    14. Li, Chen & Mogollón, José M. & Tukker, Arnold & Dong, Jianning & von Terzi, Dominic & Zhang, Chunbo & Steubing, Bernhard, 2022. "Future material requirements for global sustainable offshore wind energy development," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    15. Alessio Castorrini & Paolo Venturini & Aldo Bonfiglioli, 2022. "Generation of Surface Maps of Erosion Resistance for Wind Turbine Blades under Rain Flows," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-14, August.
    16. Jian Zhang & Guo-Kai Yuan & Songye Zhu & Quan Gu & Shitang Ke & Jinghua Lin, 2022. "Seismic Analysis of 10 MW Offshore Wind Turbine with Large-Diameter Monopile in Consideration of Seabed Liquefaction," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-31, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wang, Long & Wu, Jianghai & Wang, Tongguang & Han, Ran, 2020. "An optimization method based on random fork tree coding for the electrical networks of offshore wind farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 1340-1351.
    2. Javier Serrano González & Manuel Burgos Payán & Jesús Manuel Riquelme Santos & Ángel Gaspar González Rodríguez, 2021. "Optimal Micro-Siting of Weathervaning Floating Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-19, February.
    3. Guirguis, David & Romero, David A. & Amon, Cristina H., 2017. "Gradient-based multidisciplinary design of wind farms with continuous-variable formulations," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 197(C), pages 279-291.
    4. Aguayo, Maichel M. & Fierro, Pablo E. & De la Fuente, Rodrigo A. & Sepúlveda, Ignacio A. & Figueroa, Dante M., 2021. "A mixed-integer programming methodology to design tidal current farms integrating both cost and benefits: A case study in the Chacao Channel, Chile," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 294(C).
    5. Angel G. Gonzalez-Rodriguez & Javier Serrano-González & Manuel Burgos-Payán & Jesús Manuel Riquelme-Santos, 2021. "Realistic Optimization of Parallelogram-Shaped Offshore Wind Farms Considering Continuously Distributed Wind Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, May.
    6. Long Wang & Jianghai Wu & Zeling Tang & Tongguang Wang, 2019. "An Integration Optimization Method for Power Collection Systems of Offshore Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-16, October.
    7. Annan, Aaron M. & Lackner, Matthew A. & Manwell, James F., 2023. "Multi-objective optimization for an autonomous unmoored offshore wind energy system substructure," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 344(C).
    8. Serrano González, Javier & Burgos Payán, Manuel & Riquelme Santos, Jesús Manuel, 2018. "Optimal design of neighbouring offshore wind farms: A co-evolutionary approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C), pages 140-152.
    9. Roggenburg, Michael & Esquivel-Puentes, Helber A. & Vacca, Andrea & Bocanegra Evans, Humberto & Garcia-Bravo, Jose M. & Warsinger, David M. & Ivantysynova, Monika & Castillo, Luciano, 2020. "Techno-economic analysis of a hydraulic transmission for floating offshore wind turbines," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 1194-1204.
    10. Han, Zhi & Cao, Feifei & Tao, Ji & Shi, Hongda, 2023. "Study on the energy capture spectrum (ECS) of a multi-DoF buoy under random waves," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:rensus:v:101:y:2019:i:c:p:181-196. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/600126/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.