IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v83y2015icp881-896.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An environmental/techno-economic approach for bidding strategy in security-constrained electricity markets by a bi-level harmony search algorithm

Author

Listed:
  • Shivaie, Mojtaba
  • Ameli, Mohammad T.

Abstract

In this paper, a new approach is presented for developing optimal double-sided bidding strategy in security-constrained electricity markets by considering emission of pollutants, as further objectives. In the proposed methodology, both Generation Companies (GenCos) and Distribution Companies (DisCos) try to maximize their profit by implementation of optimal strategies, whiles they have incomplete information about their rivals and market mechanism of payment is locational marginal pricing. In addition, each participant provides its strategic bids based on supply function equilibrium model and it modifies its bidding strategies until Nash equilibrium points are computed. The proposed approach is modeled as a bi-level optimization problem with the upper sub problem addressing individual GenCos and DisCos and the lower sub problem addressing the Independent System Operator (ISO). The upper level maximizes the individual market participant's profit and the lower one solves the ISO's market clearing problem for maximizing Community Welfare Function (CWF). A Self-adaptive Global-based Harmony Search Algorithm (SGHSA) is used to obtain optimal bidding strategies. The proposed methodology has been implemented on the 6-machine 8-bus system test system to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed approach. Simulation results illustrate the profitableness of the newly developed approach in the obtaining optimal bidding strategies.

Suggested Citation

  • Shivaie, Mojtaba & Ameli, Mohammad T., 2015. "An environmental/techno-economic approach for bidding strategy in security-constrained electricity markets by a bi-level harmony search algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 881-896.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:83:y:2015:i:c:p:881-896
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2015.05.024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148115004036
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2015.05.024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Jianhui & Zhou, Zhi & Botterud, Audun, 2011. "An evolutionary game approach to analyzing bidding strategies in electricity markets with elastic demand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3459-3467.
    2. Li, Gong & Shi, Jing & Qu, Xiuli, 2011. "Modeling methods for GenCo bidding strategy optimization in the liberalized electricity spot market–A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 4686-4700.
    3. McGovern, T. & Hicks, C., 2004. "Deregulation and restructuring of the global electricity supply industry and its impact upon power plant suppliers," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(3), pages 321-337, June.
    4. Azadeh, A. & Skandari, M.R. & Maleki-Shoja, B., 2010. "An integrated ant colony optimization approach to compare strategies of clearing market in electricity markets: Agent-based simulation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(10), pages 6307-6319, October.
    5. Liu, Zhen & Zhang, Xiliang & Lieu, Jenny, 2010. "Design of the incentive mechanism in electricity auction market based on the signaling game theory," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(4), pages 1813-1819.
    6. Högselius, Per & Kaijser, Arne, 2010. "The politics of electricity deregulation in Sweden: the art of acting on multiple arenas," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(5), pages 2245-2254, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mahdi, Fahad Parvez & Vasant, Pandian & Kallimani, Vish & Watada, Junzo & Fai, Patrick Yeoh Siew & Abdullah-Al-Wadud, M., 2018. "A holistic review on optimization strategies for combined economic emission dispatch problem," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 3006-3020.
    2. Afshar, Karim & Ghiasvand, Farshad Shamsini & Bigdeli, Nooshin, 2018. "Optimal bidding strategy of wind power producers in pay-as-bid power markets," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 575-586.
    3. Huiru Zhao & Yuwei Wang & Mingrui Zhao & Qingkun Tan & Sen Guo, 2017. "Day-Ahead Market Modeling for Strategic Wind Power Producers under Robust Market Clearing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-27, July.
    4. Huiru Zhao & Yuwei Wang & Sen Guo & Mingrui Zhao & Chao Zhang, 2016. "Application of a Gradient Descent Continuous Actor-Critic Algorithm for Double-Side Day-Ahead Electricity Market Modeling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, September.
    5. Li, Qirui & Yang, Zhifang & Yu, Juan & Li, Wenyuan, 2023. "Impacts of previous revenues on bidding strategies in electricity market: A quantitative analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 345(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mojtaba Shivaie & Mohammad Kiani-Moghaddam & Philip D Weinsier, 2022. "Bilateral bidding strategy in joint day-ahead energy and reserve electricity markets considering techno-economic-environmental measures," Energy & Environment, , vol. 33(4), pages 696-727, June.
    2. Afshar, Karim & Ghiasvand, Farshad Shamsini & Bigdeli, Nooshin, 2018. "Optimal bidding strategy of wind power producers in pay-as-bid power markets," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 575-586.
    3. Motamedi Sedeh, Omid & Ostadi, Bakhtiar, 2020. "Optimization of bidding strategy in the day-ahead market by consideration of seasonality trend of the market spot price," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    4. Jorge Barrientos Marin & Hector Gomez Marin, 2022. "Oligopoly and Collusion in the Colombian Electricity Market," International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, Econjournals, vol. 12(3), pages 125-134, May.
    5. Li, Gong & Shi, Jing & Qu, Xiuli, 2011. "Modeling methods for GenCo bidding strategy optimization in the liberalized electricity spot market–A state-of-the-art review," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 4686-4700.
    6. Sarıca, Kemal & Kumbaroğlu, Gürkan & Or, Ilhan, 2012. "Modeling and analysis of a decentralized electricity market: An integrated simulation/optimization approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 44(1), pages 830-852.
    7. Shafie-khah, Miadreza & Parsa Moghaddam, Mohsen & Sheikh-El-Eslami, Mohamad Kazem & Rahmani-Andebili, Mehdi, 2012. "Modeling of interactions between market regulations and behavior of plug-in electric vehicle aggregators in a virtual power market environment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 40(1), pages 139-150.
    8. Motalleb, Mahdi & Annaswamy, Anuradha & Ghorbani, Reza, 2018. "A real-time demand response market through a repeated incomplete-information game," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 424-438.
    9. Huiru Zhao & Yuwei Wang & Sen Guo & Mingrui Zhao & Chao Zhang, 2016. "Application of a Gradient Descent Continuous Actor-Critic Algorithm for Double-Side Day-Ahead Electricity Market Modeling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, September.
    10. Wang, Haiyang & Zhang, Chenghui & Li, Ke & Ma, Xin, 2021. "Game theory-based multi-agent capacity optimization for integrated energy systems with compressed air energy storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 221(C).
    11. Min, C.G. & Kim, M.K. & Park, J.K. & Yoon, Y.T., 2013. "Game-theory-based generation maintenance scheduling in electricity markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 310-318.
    12. Zou, Peng & Chen, Qixin & Xia, Qing & He, Chang & Kang, Chongqing, 2015. "Incentive compatible pool-based electricity market design and implementation: A Bayesian mechanism design approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 508-518.
    13. Debin Fang & Qiyu Ren & Qian Yu, 2018. "How Elastic Demand Affects Bidding Strategy in Electricity Market: An Auction Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    14. Motalleb, Mahdi & Ghorbani, Reza, 2017. "Non-cooperative game-theoretic model of demand response aggregator competition for selling stored energy in storage devices," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 202(C), pages 581-596.
    15. Pinto, T. & Morais, H. & Oliveira, P. & Vale, Z. & Praça, I. & Ramos, C., 2011. "A new approach for multi-agent coalition formation and management in the scope of electricity markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 5004-5015.
    16. Silva, Ana R. & Pousinho, H.M.I. & Estanqueiro, Ana, 2022. "A multistage stochastic approach for the optimal bidding of variable renewable energy in the day-ahead, intraday and balancing markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    17. Rubin, Ofir D. & Babcock, Bruce A., 2013. "The impact of expansion of wind power capacity and pricing methods on the efficiency of deregulated electricity markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 676-688.
    18. Yang, Yunpeng & Yang, Weixin & Chen, Hongmin & Li, Yin, 2020. "China’s energy whistleblowing and energy supervision policy: An evolutionary game perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    19. Darmani, Anna & Rickne, Annika & Hidalgo, Antonio & Arvidsson, Niklas, 2016. "When outcomes are the reflection of the analysis criteria: A review of the tradable green certificate assessments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 372-381.
    20. Bubak, Baran, 2020. "تخمین نرخ بهینه عوارض تراکم برای آزادراه‏های ایران با استفاده از مدل قیمت‏گذاری ارزش [Estimation of Optimal Rate for Compact Tariffs in Highways across Iran applying the Value Pricing Methodology]," MPRA Paper 105490, University Library of Munich, Germany.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:83:y:2015:i:c:p:881-896. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.