IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v10y2017i7p924-d103517.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Day-Ahead Market Modeling for Strategic Wind Power Producers under Robust Market Clearing

Author

Listed:
  • Huiru Zhao

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Yuwei Wang

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Mingrui Zhao

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Qingkun Tan

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

  • Sen Guo

    (School of Economics and Management, North China Electric Power University, Beijing 102206, China)

Abstract

In this paper, considering real time wind power uncertainties, the strategic behaviors of wind power producers adopting two different bidding modes in day-ahead electricity market is modeled and experimentally compared. These two different bidding modes only provide a wind power output plan and a bidding curve consisting of bidding price and power output, respectively. On the one hand, to significantly improve wind power accommodation, a robust market clearing model is employed for day-ahead market clearing implemented by an independent system operator. On the other hand, since the Least Squares Continuous Actor-Critic algorithm is demonstrated as an effective method in dealing with Markov decision-making problems with continuous state and action sets, we propose the Least Squares Continuous Actor-Critic-based approaches to model and simulate the dynamic bidding interaction processes of many wind power producers adopting two different bidding modes in the day-head electricity market under robust market clearing conditions, respectively. Simulations are implemented on the IEEE 30-bus test system with five strategic wind power producers, which verify the rationality of our proposed approaches. Moreover, the quantitative analysis and comparisons conducted in our simulations put forward some suggestions about leading wind power producers to reasonably bid in market and bidding mode selections.

Suggested Citation

  • Huiru Zhao & Yuwei Wang & Mingrui Zhao & Qingkun Tan & Sen Guo, 2017. "Day-Ahead Market Modeling for Strategic Wind Power Producers under Robust Market Clearing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-27, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:7:p:924-:d:103517
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/7/924/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/10/7/924/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xiao, Yunpeng & Wang, Xifan & Wang, Xiuli & Dang, Can & Lu, Ming, 2016. "Behavior analysis of wind power producer in electricity market," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 325-335.
    2. Huiru Zhao & Yuwei Wang & Sen Guo & Mingrui Zhao & Chao Zhang, 2016. "Application of a Gradient Descent Continuous Actor-Critic Algorithm for Double-Side Day-Ahead Electricity Market Modeling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, September.
    3. Vilim, Michael & Botterud, Audun, 2014. "Wind power bidding in electricity markets with high wind penetration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 141-155.
    4. Min, C.G. & Kim, M.K. & Park, J.K. & Yoon, Y.T., 2013. "Game-theory-based generation maintenance scheduling in electricity markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 310-318.
    5. Salehizadeh, Mohammad Reza & Soltaniyan, Salman, 2016. "Application of fuzzy Q-learning for electricity market modeling by considering renewable power penetration," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 1172-1181.
    6. Wang, Jianhui & Zhou, Zhi & Botterud, Audun, 2011. "An evolutionary game approach to analyzing bidding strategies in electricity markets with elastic demand," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3459-3467.
    7. Laia, R. & Pousinho, H.M.I. & Melíco, R. & Mendes, V.M.F., 2016. "Bidding strategy of wind-thermal energy producers," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 673-681.
    8. Shivaie, Mojtaba & Ameli, Mohammad T., 2015. "An environmental/techno-economic approach for bidding strategy in security-constrained electricity markets by a bi-level harmony search algorithm," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 881-896.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jianwei Gao & Yu Yang & Fangjie Gao & Haoyu Wu, 2022. "Two-Stage Robust Economic Dispatch of Regional Integrated Energy System Considering Source-Load Uncertainty Based on Carbon Neutral Vision," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-16, February.
    2. Wang, Yuwei & Tang, Liu & Yang, Yuanjuan & Sun, Wei & Zhao, Huiru, 2020. "A stochastic-robust coordinated optimization model for CCHP micro-grid considering multi-energy operation and power trading with electricity markets under uncertainties," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    3. Qiu, Haifeng & Gu, Wei & Liu, Pengxiang & Sun, Qirun & Wu, Zhi & Lu, Xi, 2022. "Application of two-stage robust optimization theory in power system scheduling under uncertainties: A review and perspective," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    4. Hongze Li & Xuejie Wang & Fengyun Li & Yuwei Wang & Xinhua Yu, 2018. "A Robust Day-Ahead Electricity Market Clearing Model Considering Wind Power Penetration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-18, July.
    5. Jun Dong & Peiwen Yang & Shilin Nie, 2019. "Day-Ahead Scheduling Model of the Distributed Small Hydro-Wind-Energy Storage Power System Based on Two-Stage Stochastic Robust Optimization," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-27, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Huiru Zhao & Yuwei Wang & Sen Guo & Mingrui Zhao & Chao Zhang, 2016. "Application of a Gradient Descent Continuous Actor-Critic Algorithm for Double-Side Day-Ahead Electricity Market Modeling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-20, September.
    2. Hosseini, Seyyed Ahmad & Toubeau, Jean-François & De Grève, Zacharie & Vallée, François, 2020. "An advanced day-ahead bidding strategy for wind power producers considering confidence level on the real-time reserve provision," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    3. Afshar, Karim & Ghiasvand, Farshad Shamsini & Bigdeli, Nooshin, 2018. "Optimal bidding strategy of wind power producers in pay-as-bid power markets," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 575-586.
    4. Xiao, Yunpeng & Wang, Xifan & Wang, Xiuli & Wu, Zechen, 2016. "Trading wind power with barrier option," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 232-242.
    5. Exizidis, Lazaros & Kazempour, S. Jalal & Pinson, Pierre & de Greve, Zacharie & Vallée, François, 2016. "Sharing wind power forecasts in electricity markets: A numerical analysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 65-73.
    6. Motalleb, Mahdi & Annaswamy, Anuradha & Ghorbani, Reza, 2018. "A real-time demand response market through a repeated incomplete-information game," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 424-438.
    7. Rongquan Zhang & Saddam Aziz & Muhammad Umar Farooq & Kazi Nazmul Hasan & Nabil Mohammed & Sadiq Ahmad & Nisrine Ibadah, 2021. "A Wind Energy Supplier Bidding Strategy Using Combined EGA-Inspired HPSOIFA Optimizer and Deep Learning Predictor," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-22, May.
    8. Yang, Peiwen & Dong, Jun & Lin, Jin & Liu, Yao & Fang, Debin, 2021. "Analysis of offering behavior of generation-side integrated energy aggregator in electricity market:A Bayesian evolutionary approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    9. Lu, Tianguang & Ai, Qian & Wang, Zhaoyu, 2018. "Interactive game vector: A stochastic operation-based pricing mechanism for smart energy systems with coupled-microgrids," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 212(C), pages 1462-1475.
    10. Alqahtani, Mohammed & Hu, Mengqi, 2022. "Dynamic energy scheduling and routing of multiple electric vehicles using deep reinforcement learning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(PA).
    11. Pinto, T. & Morais, H. & Oliveira, P. & Vale, Z. & Praça, I. & Ramos, C., 2011. "A new approach for multi-agent coalition formation and management in the scope of electricity markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(8), pages 5004-5015.
    12. Mohammad Reza Salehizadeh & Mahdi Amidi Koohbijari & Hassan Nouri & Akın Taşcıkaraoğlu & Ozan Erdinç & João P. S. Catalão, 2019. "Bi-Objective Optimization Model for Optimal Placement of Thyristor-Controlled Series Compensator Devices," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(13), pages 1-16, July.
    13. Bin Ye & Jingjing Jiang & Lixin Miao & Ji Li & Yang Peng, 2015. "Innovative Carbon Allowance Allocation Policy for the Shenzhen Emission Trading Scheme in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(1), pages 1-23, December.
    14. Wang, Meng & Infante Ferreira, Carlos A., 2017. "Absorption heat pump cycles with NH3 – ionic liquid working pairs," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 819-830.
    15. Ning Wang & Weisheng Xu & Weihui Shao & Zhiyu Xu, 2019. "A Q-Cube Framework of Reinforcement Learning Algorithm for Continuous Double Auction among Microgrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-26, July.
    16. Zhou, Dengji & Yu, Ziqiang & Zhang, Huisheng & Weng, Shilie, 2016. "A novel grey prognostic model based on Markov process and grey incidence analysis for energy conversion equipment degradation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 420-429.
    17. Weimer-Jehle, Wolfgang & Buchgeister, Jens & Hauser, Wolfgang & Kosow, Hannah & Naegler, Tobias & Poganietz, Witold-Roger & Pregger, Thomas & Prehofer, Sigrid & von Recklinghausen, Andreas & Schippl, , 2016. "Context scenarios and their usage for the construction of socio-technical energy scenarios," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 956-970.
    18. Banaei, Mohsen & Oloomi-Buygi, Majid & Zabetian-Hosseini, Seyed-Mahdi, 2018. "Strategic gaming of wind power producers joined with thermal units in electricity markets," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 1067-1074.
    19. Froger, Aurélien & Gendreau, Michel & Mendoza, Jorge E. & Pinson, Éric & Rousseau, Louis-Martin, 2016. "Maintenance scheduling in the electricity industry: A literature review," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 251(3), pages 695-706.
    20. Rokhforoz, Pegah & Montazeri, Mina & Fink, Olga, 2023. "Safe multi-agent deep reinforcement learning for joint bidding and maintenance scheduling of generation units," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:10:y:2017:i:7:p:924-:d:103517. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.