IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v225y2024ics0960148124003379.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermodynamic analysis of a coupled system based on total flow cycle and partially evaporated organic Rankine cycle for hot dry rock utilization

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Zengli
  • Shao, Hua
  • Shao, Mingcheng
  • Dai, Zeyu
  • Zhang, Rao

Abstract

The total flow cycle (TFC) has a great potential to improve efficiency of geothermal energy utilization. However, it can not fully utilize the heat source due to the limited expansion ratio of the two-phase expander. To solve the problem, a coupled system of TFC and partially evaporated organic Rankine cycle (TFC-PEORC) is proposed. The thermodynamic model considering the pinch point location migration is developed, and the effects of operating parameters on the temperature matching and system performance are investigated. On this basis, system optimization is carried out. At the same time, the performance of TFC-PEORC was compared with the single-stage TFC, the coupled system of TFC and organic Rankine cycle (TFC-ORC), the coupled system of trilateral cycle and organic Rankine cycle (TLC-ORC), and the coupled system of TFC and Kalina cycle (TFC-KC) under optimal operating conditions. The results show that the net output power of TFC-PEORC has a 14.26 % increase compared to TFC, and that TFC-PEORC can provide excellent the temperature matching of the high temperature (HT) stage and the low temperature (LT) stage working fluids, thus providing the maximum net output power (84.36 kW) that is up to 1.93 % higher than TFC-ORC.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Zengli & Shao, Hua & Shao, Mingcheng & Dai, Zeyu & Zhang, Rao, 2024. "Thermodynamic analysis of a coupled system based on total flow cycle and partially evaporated organic Rankine cycle for hot dry rock utilization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:225:y:2024:i:c:s0960148124003379
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2024.120272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124003379
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2024.120272?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jin, Yunli & Gao, Naiping & Wang, Tiantian, 2020. "Influence of heat exchanger pinch point on the control strategy of Organic Rankine cycle (ORC)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    2. Meng, Dongyu & Liu, Qiang & Ji, Zhongli, 2022. "Effects of two-phase expander on the thermoeconomics of organic double-flash cycles for geothermal power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 239(PD).
    3. Mohammadi, Zahra & Fallah, Mohsen, 2023. "Conventional and advanced exergy investigation of a double flash cycle integrated by absorption cooling, ORC, and TEG power system driven by geothermal energy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    4. Wang, Yongzhen & Li, Chengjun & Zhao, Jun & Wu, Boyuan & Du, Yanping & Zhang, Jing & Zhu, Yilin, 2021. "The above-ground strategies to approach the goal of geothermal power generation in China: State of art and future researches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    5. Choi, Byung Chul & Kim, Young Min, 2013. "Thermodynamic analysis of a dual loop heat recovery system with trilateral cycle applied to exhaust gases of internal combustion engine for propulsion of the 6800 TEU container ship," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 404-416.
    6. Wang, Zengli & Zhou, Hongyang & Hao, Muming & Wang, Jun & Geng, Maofei, 2022. "Thermodynamic analysis and comparative investigation of a novel total flow and Kalina cycle coupled system for fluctuating geothermal energy utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    7. Shokati, Naser & Ranjbar, Faramarz & Yari, Mortaza, 2015. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of basic, dual-pressure and dual-fluid ORCs and Kalina geothermal power plants: A comparative study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 527-542.
    8. Lei, Biao & Wang, Wei & Wu, Yu-Ting & Ma, Chong-Fang & Wang, Jing-Fu & Zhang, Lei & Li, Chuang & Zhao, Ying-Kun & Zhi, Rui-Ping, 2016. "Development and experimental study on a single screw expander integrated into an Organic Rankine Cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(P1), pages 43-52.
    9. Wang, Jiangtao & Zhai, Yuling & Wang, Hua & Li, Zhouhang, 2023. "Heat transfer performance of supercritical R134a in a U-bend vapor generator for transcritical ORC system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 276(C).
    10. Xia, Liangyu & Zhang, Yabo, 2019. "An overview of world geothermal power generation and a case study on China—The resource and market perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 411-423.
    11. Lecompte, Steven & Huisseune, Henk & van den Broek, Martijn & Vanslambrouck, Bruno & De Paepe, Michel, 2015. "Review of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) architectures for waste heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 47(C), pages 448-461.
    12. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2018. "Exergetic optimization of double stage Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 296-313.
    13. Astolfi, Marco & Romano, Matteo C. & Bombarda, Paola & Macchi, Ennio, 2014. "Binary ORC (organic Rankine cycles) power plants for the exploitation of medium–low temperature geothermal sources – Part A: Thermodynamic optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 423-434.
    14. Yari, M. & Mehr, A.S. & Zare, V. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S. & Rosen, M.A., 2015. "Exergoeconomic comparison of TLC (trilateral Rankine cycle), ORC (organic Rankine cycle) and Kalina cycle using a low grade heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 712-722.
    15. Li, You-Rong & Wang, Jian-Ning & Du, Mei-Tang, 2012. "Influence of coupled pinch point temperature difference and evaporation temperature on performance of organic Rankine cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 42(1), pages 503-509.
    16. Zhang, Xinxin & He, Maogang & Zhang, Ying, 2012. "A review of research on the Kalina cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(7), pages 5309-5318.
    17. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2023. "Exergy efficiency potential of dual-phase expansion trilateral and partial evaporation ORC with zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    18. Zhu, Jialing & Hu, Kaiyong & Lu, Xinli & Huang, Xiaoxue & Liu, Ketao & Wu, Xiujie, 2015. "A review of geothermal energy resources, development, and applications in China: Current status and prospects," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 93(P1), pages 466-483.
    19. Manente, Giovanni & Lazzaretto, Andrea & Bonamico, Eleonora, 2017. "Design guidelines for the choice between single and dual pressure layouts in organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 413-431.
    20. Zhou, Zongming & Cao, Yan & Anqi, Ali E. & Zoghi, Mohammad & Habibi, Hamed & Rajhi, Ali A. & Alamri, Sagr, 2022. "Converting a geothermal-driven steam flash cycle into a high-performance polygeneration system by waste heat recovery: 3E analysis and Genetic-Fgoalattain optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 609-627.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Jian & Peng, Xiayao & Yang, Zhen & Hu, Shuozhuo & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2022. "Design, improvements and applications of dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles: A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 311(C).
    2. Mustapić, N. & Kralj, Toni & Vujanović, Milan, 2024. "Split flow principle implementation for advanced subcritical double stage organic rankine cycle configuration for geothermal power production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    3. Varma, G.V. Pradeep & Srinivas, T., 2017. "Power generation from low temperature heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 402-414.
    4. Hoang, Anh Tuan, 2018. "Waste heat recovery from diesel engines based on Organic Rankine Cycle," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C), pages 138-166.
    5. Pezzuolo, Alex & Benato, Alberto & Stoppato, Anna & Mirandola, Alberto, 2016. "The ORC-PD: A versatile tool for fluid selection and Organic Rankine Cycle unit design," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 605-620.
    6. Nenad Mustapić & Vladislav Brkić & Željko Duić & Toni Kralj, 2022. "Thermodynamic Optimization of Advanced Organic Rankine Cycle Configurations for Geothermal Energy Applications," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-36, September.
    7. Yuan Zhao & Chenghao Gao & Chengjun Li & Jie Sun & Chunyan Wang & Qiang Liu & Jun Zhao, 2022. "Energy and Exergy Analyses of Geothermal Organic Rankine Cycles Considering the Effect of Brine Reinjection Temperature," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Grispos, Victoras & Karellas, Sotirios, 2021. "Exergetic efficiency potential of double-stage ORCs with zeotropic mixtures of natural hydrocarbons and CO2," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    9. Li, Jian & Ge, Zhong & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen & Liu, Qiang, 2018. "Parametric optimization and thermodynamic performance comparison of single-pressure and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 409-421.
    10. Tian, Zhen & Gan, Wanlong & Qi, Zhixin & Tian, Molin & Gao, Wenzhong, 2022. "Experimental study of organic Rankine cycle with three-fluid recuperator for cryogenic cold energy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    11. Chintala, Venkateswarlu & Kumar, Suresh & Pandey, Jitendra K., 2018. "A technical review on waste heat recovery from compression ignition engines using organic Rankine cycle," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 493-509.
    12. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2018. "Exergetic optimization of double stage Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC)," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 296-313.
    13. Rech, Sergio & Zandarin, Simone & Lazzaretto, Andrea & Frangopoulos, Christos A., 2017. "Design and off-design models of single and two-stage ORC systems on board a LNG carrier for the search of the optimal performance and control strategy," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 221-241.
    14. Mondejar, M.E. & Andreasen, J.G. & Pierobon, L. & Larsen, U. & Thern, M. & Haglind, F., 2018. "A review of the use of organic Rankine cycle power systems for maritime applications," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 91(C), pages 126-151.
    15. Lazzaretto, Andrea & Manente, Giovanni & Toffolo, Andrea, 2018. "SYNTHSEP: A general methodology for the synthesis of energy system configurations beyond superstructures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 924-949.
    16. Ruixiong Li & Huanran Wang & Erren Yao & Shuyu Zhang, 2016. "Thermo-Economic Comparison and Parametric Optimizations among Two Compressed Air Energy Storage System Based on Kalina Cycle and ORC," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-19, December.
    17. Li, Jian & Yang, Zhen & Hu, Shuozhuo & Yang, Fubin & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2020. "Thermo-economic analyses and evaluations of small-scale dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycle system using pure fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    18. Braimakis, Konstantinos & Karellas, Sotirios, 2023. "Exergy efficiency potential of dual-phase expansion trilateral and partial evaporation ORC with zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 262(PB).
    19. Michał Kaczmarczyk & Barbara Tomaszewska & Agnieszka Operacz, 2020. "Sustainable Utilization of Low Enthalpy Geothermal Resources to Electricity Generation through a Cascade System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-18, May.
    20. Wang, Yongzhen & Li, Chengjun & Zhao, Jun & Wu, Boyuan & Du, Yanping & Zhang, Jing & Zhu, Yilin, 2021. "The above-ground strategies to approach the goal of geothermal power generation in China: State of art and future researches," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:225:y:2024:i:c:s0960148124003379. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.