IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v225y2024ics0960148124003264.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Unveil the role of engineering parameters on hydrogen recovery in deep saline aquifer, Rock Springs Uplift, Wyoming

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Heng
  • Xin, Yuchen
  • Kou, Zuhao
  • He, Chunyu
  • Li, Yunfei
  • Wang, Tongtong

Abstract

Hydrogen (H₂), as a renewable energy source, holds immense importance in energy conversion and storage. Among various methods, underground hydrogen storage (UHS) stands out, especially during high energy demand in winter, owing to the vast subsurface reservoirs. This study aims to uncover the impact of engineering constraints on H₂ storage conditions and recovery processes. To begin, a geological model mirroring a genuine deep saline aquifer found in the Rock Springs Uplift of Wyoming is developed. This model is intricately linked with fluid composition and multiphase flow properties. The resulting reservoir is utilized in a series of computational experiments, shedding light on the intricate interplay between engineering constraints and H₂ storage dynamics. The research findings indicate that a longer duration of H₂ injection or production stages leads to higher H₂ retention within the aquifer. Specifically, the study reveals that a 3-month injection period (with a final recovery of 0.864) retains less H₂ compared to a 6-month injection period (with a final recovery of 0.805). Regarding well patterns, the research highlights that trapped H₂ steadily accumulates due to the mutual displacement of H₂ and water in a single-well scenario, intensifying the impact of multiphase hysteresis. The study shows that H₂ recovery increases over time for different well configurations: a single well, one injection well + one production well, and two injection wells + two production wells, reaching final values of 0.839, 0.76, and 0.778, respectively. After undergoing 9 cycles of operations, top perforation, as opposed to bottom perforation and full perforation, leads to the highest recovery rate of 0.864. These findings not only provide valuable insights for guiding the engineering design of UHS systems but also pave the way for the practical implementation of UHS on a commercial scale.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Heng & Xin, Yuchen & Kou, Zuhao & He, Chunyu & Li, Yunfei & Wang, Tongtong, 2024. "Unveil the role of engineering parameters on hydrogen recovery in deep saline aquifer, Rock Springs Uplift, Wyoming," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 225(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:225:y:2024:i:c:s0960148124003264
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2024.120261
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148124003264
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2024.120261?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Heng & Kou, Zuhao & Ji, Zemin & Wang, Shouchuan & Li, Yunfei & Jiao, Zunsheng & Johnson, Matthew & McLaughlin, J. Fred, 2023. "Investigation of enhanced CO2 storage in deep saline aquifers by WAG and brine extraction in the Minnelusa sandstone, Wyoming," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 265(C).
    2. Jafari Raad, Seyed Mostafa & Leonenko, Yuri & Hassanzadeh, Hassan, 2022. "Hydrogen storage in saline aquifers: Opportunities and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    3. William A. Braff & Joshua M. Mueller & Jessika E. Trancik, 2016. "Value of storage technologies for wind and solar energy," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 6(10), pages 964-969, October.
    4. Rodrigues, E.M.G. & Godina, R. & Santos, S.F. & Bizuayehu, A.W. & Contreras, J. & Catalão, J.P.S., 2014. "Energy storage systems supporting increased penetration of renewables in islanded systems," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 265-280.
    5. Liu, Wei & Zhang, Zhixin & Chen, Jie & Jiang, Deyi & Wu, Fei & Fan, Jinyang & Li, Yinping, 2020. "Feasibility evaluation of large-scale underground hydrogen storage in bedded salt rocks of China: A case study in Jiangsu province," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    6. Chai, Maojie & Chen, Zhangxin & Nourozieh, Hossein & Yang, Min, 2023. "Numerical simulation of large-scale seasonal hydrogen storage in an anticline aquifer: A case study capturing hydrogen interactions and cushion gas injection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    7. Tarkowski, Radoslaw, 2019. "Underground hydrogen storage: Characteristics and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 86-94.
    8. Qingping Li & Shuxia Li & Shuyue Ding & Zhenyuan Yin & Lu Liu & Shuaijun Li, 2022. "Numerical Simulation of Gas Production and Reservoir Stability during CO 2 Exchange in Natural Gas Hydrate Reservoir," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-17, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Du, Zhengyang & Dai, Zhenxue & Yang, Zhijie & Zhan, Chuanjun & Chen, Wei & Cao, Mingxu & Thanh, Hung Vo & Soltanian, Mohamad Reza, 2024. "Exploring hydrogen geologic storage in China for future energy: Opportunities and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    2. Chai, Maojie & Chen, Zhangxin & Nourozieh, Hossein & Yang, Min, 2023. "Numerical simulation of large-scale seasonal hydrogen storage in an anticline aquifer: A case study capturing hydrogen interactions and cushion gas injection," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 334(C).
    3. Mao, Shaowen & Chen, Bailian & Malki, Mohamed & Chen, Fangxuan & Morales, Misael & Ma, Zhiwei & Mehana, Mohamed, 2024. "Efficient prediction of hydrogen storage performance in depleted gas reservoirs using machine learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 361(C).
    4. Jahanbakhsh, Amir & Louis Potapov-Crighton, Alexander & Mosallanezhad, Abdolali & Tohidi Kaloorazi, Nina & Maroto-Valer, M. Mercedes, 2024. "Underground hydrogen storage: A UK perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PB).
    5. Aleksandra Małachowska & Natalia Łukasik & Joanna Mioduska & Jacek Gębicki, 2022. "Hydrogen Storage in Geological Formations—The Potential of Salt Caverns," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Zhu, Shijie & Shi, Xilin & Yang, Chunhe & Li, Yinping & Li, Hang & Yang, Kun & Wei, Xinxing & Bai, Weizheng & Liu, Xin, 2023. "Hydrogen loss of salt cavern hydrogen storage," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 218(C).
    7. Tarkowski, Radosław & Lankof, Leszek & Luboń, Katarzyna & Michalski, Jan, 2024. "Hydrogen storage capacity of salt caverns and deep aquifers versus demand for hydrogen storage: A case study of Poland," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 355(C).
    8. He, Youwei & Xie, Yixiang & Qiao, Yu & Qin, Jiazheng & Tang, Yong, 2024. "Estimation of underground hydrogen storage capacity in depleted gas reservoirs using CO2 as cushion gas," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 375(C).
    9. Katarzyna Luboń & Radosław Tarkowski, 2024. "Hydrogen Storage in Deep Saline Aquifers: Non-Recoverable Cushion Gas after Storage," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(6), pages 1-17, March.
    10. Asha-Dee N. Celestine & Martin Sulic & Marika Wieliczko & Ned T. Stetson, 2021. "Hydrogen-Based Energy Storage Systems for Large-Scale Data Center Applications," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-16, November.
    11. Song, Rui & Wu, Mingyang & Liu, Jianjun & Yang, Chunhe, 2024. "Pore scale modeling on microbial hydrogen consumption and mass transfer of multicomponent gas flow in underground hydrogen storage of depleted reservoir," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    12. Huang, Qisheng & Xu, Yunjian & Courcoubetis, Costas, 2020. "Stackelberg competition between merchant and regulated storage investment in wholesale electricity markets," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 264(C).
    13. Heo, SungKu & Byun, Jaewon & Ifaei, Pouya & Ko, Jaerak & Ha, Byeongmin & Hwangbo, Soonho & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2024. "Towards mega-scale decarbonized industrial park (Mega-DIP): Generative AI-driven techno-economic and environmental assessment of renewable and sustainable energy utilization in petrochemical industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PA).
    14. Zizzo, G. & Beccali, M. & Bonomolo, M. & Di Pietra, B. & Ippolito, M.G. & La Cascia, D. & Leone, G. & Lo Brano, V. & Monteleone, F., 2017. "A feasibility study of some DSM enabling solutions in small islands: The case of Lampedusa," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 140(P1), pages 1030-1046.
    15. Ghosh, Sourav & Yadav, Sarita & Devi, Ambika & Thomas, Tiju, 2022. "Techno-economic understanding of Indian energy-storage market: A perspective on green materials-based supercapacitor technologies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    16. Bohang Liu & Lei Wang & Yintong Guo & Jing Li & Hanzhi Yang, 2022. "Experimental Investigation on the Evolution of Tensile Mechanical Behavior of Cement Stone Considering the Variation of Burial Depth," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-16, October.
    17. Merrick, James H. & Bistline, John E.T. & Blanford, Geoffrey J., 2024. "On representation of energy storage in electricity planning models," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    18. Barbara Uliasz-Misiak & Joanna Lewandowska-Śmierzchalska & Rafał Matuła & Radosław Tarkowski, 2022. "Prospects for the Implementation of Underground Hydrogen Storage in the EU," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(24), pages 1-17, December.
    19. Dariusz Knez & Omid Ahmad Mahmoudi Zamani, 2023. "Up-to-Date Status of Geoscience in the Field of Natural Hydrogen with Consideration of Petroleum Issues," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-17, September.
    20. Yang, Shenyao & Hu, Shilai & Qi, Zhilin & Qi, Huiqing & Zhao, Guanqun & Li, Jiqiang & Yan, Wende & Huang, Xiaoliang, 2024. "Experiment and prediction for dynamic storage capacity of underground gas storage rebuilt from hydrocarbon reservoir," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:225:y:2024:i:c:s0960148124003264. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.