IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v220y2024ics0960148123016026.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated physical design, control design, and site selection for an underwater energy-harvesting kite system

Author

Listed:
  • Naik, Kartik
  • Vermillion, Chris

Abstract

This paper presents a co-design framework that optimizes the kite design, site, and controller of a kite-based marine hydrokinetic (MHK) energy-harvesting system. The formulation seeks to maximize a techno-economic metric, namely power-to-mass ratio, by simultaneously considering three key categories of decision variables while accounting for the coupling between the three. The simultaneous consideration presents computational challenges associated with optimizing a large number of decision variables, a subset of which (control variables) are time trajectories. The multi-fidelity co-design formulation presented in this work utilizes two techniques, namely nesting and layering, to solve the optimization problem in a computationally tractable manner without significantly compromising on accuracy. Specifically, nesting allows for efficient integration of the three optimization sub-modules into one integrated framework without accuracy losses, whereas layering allows for successive design space reduction as the overall optimization progresses from using a low-fidelity model to using a higher-fidelity model. The resulting integrated co-design tool was applied to a region of interest off the North Carolina coast to optimally choose a combination of deployment site, kite design, and control strategy. We show that the integrated co-design tool results in a two-fold performance improvement over benchmarks derived from sequential (or independent) optimization of the kite categories, thereby underscoring the need for co-design. Computational effectiveness is demonstrated by comparing the computational cost of the nested and layered approach against the estimated computational costs that would be required to perform a single high-fidelity integrated optimization over the entire design space.

Suggested Citation

  • Naik, Kartik & Vermillion, Chris, 2024. "Integrated physical design, control design, and site selection for an underwater energy-harvesting kite system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:220:y:2024:i:c:s0960148123016026
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.119687
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148123016026
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2023.119687?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Argatov, I. & Rautakorpi, P. & Silvennoinen, R., 2009. "Estimation of the mechanical energy output of the kite wind generator," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(6), pages 1525-1532.
    2. Li, Binghui & de Queiroz, Anderson Rodrigo & DeCarolis, Joseph F. & Bane, John & He, Ruoying & Keeler, Andrew G. & Neary, Vincent S., 2017. "The economics of electricity generation from Gulf Stream currents," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 649-658.
    3. Archer, Cristina L. & Delle Monache, Luca & Rife, Daran L., 2014. "Airborne wind energy: Optimal locations and variability," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 180-186.
    4. Güney, M.S. & Kaygusuz, K., 2010. "Hydrokinetic energy conversion systems: A technology status review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 2996-3004, December.
    5. van der Vlugt, Rolf & Bley, Anna & Noom, Michael & Schmehl, Roland, 2019. "Quasi-steady model of a pumping kite power system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 83-99.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lunney, E. & Ban, M. & Duic, N. & Foley, A., 2017. "A state-of-the-art review and feasibility analysis of high altitude wind power in Northern Ireland," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P2), pages 899-911.
    2. De Lellis, M. & Mendonça, A.K. & Saraiva, R. & Trofino, A. & Lezana, Á., 2016. "Electric power generation in wind farms with pumping kites: An economical analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 163-172.
    3. Fagiano, L. & Schnez, S., 2017. "On the take-off of airborne wind energy systems based on rigid wings," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 473-488.
    4. Bechtle, Philip & Schelbergen, Mark & Schmehl, Roland & Zillmann, Udo & Watson, Simon, 2019. "Airborne wind energy resource analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1103-1116.
    5. Argatov, Ivan & Shafranov, Valentin, 2016. "Economic assessment of small-scale kite wind generators," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 125-134.
    6. Coleman, J. & Ahmad, H. & Pican, E. & Toal, D., 2014. "Modelling of a synchronous offshore pumping mode airborne wind energy farm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 569-578.
    7. Vermaak, Herman Jacobus & Kusakana, Kanzumba & Koko, Sandile Philip, 2014. "Status of micro-hydrokinetic river technology in rural applications: A review of literature," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 625-633.
    8. Dey, Subhashish & Sreenivasulu, Anduri & Veerendra, G.T.N. & Rao, K. Venkateswara & Babu, P.S.S. Anjaneya, 2022. "Renewable energy present status and future potentials in India: An overview," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 1(1).
    9. Reddy, K. Bheemalingeswara & Bhosale, Amit C., 2024. "Effect of number of blades on performance and wake recovery for a vertical axis helical hydrokinetic turbine," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    10. Kaygusuz, Kamil, 2012. "Energy for sustainable development: A case of developing countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 1116-1126.
    11. Jochem De Schutter & Rachel Leuthold & Thilo Bronnenmeyer & Elena Malz & Sebastien Gros & Moritz Diehl, 2023. "AWEbox : An Optimal Control Framework for Single- and Multi-Aircraft Airborne Wind Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-32, February.
    12. Saleem, Arslan & Kim, Man-Hoe, 2020. "Aerodynamic performance optimization of an airfoil-based airborne wind turbine using genetic algorithm," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    13. Sweder Reuchlin & Rishikesh Joshi & Roland Schmehl, 2023. "Sizing of Hybrid Power Systems for Off-Grid Applications Using Airborne Wind Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-15, May.
    14. Mostafa A. Rushdi & Ahmad A. Rushdi & Tarek N. Dief & Amr M. Halawa & Shigeo Yoshida & Roland Schmehl, 2020. "Power Prediction of Airborne Wind Energy Systems Using Multivariate Machine Learning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-23, May.
    15. Ifaei, Pouya & Tayerani Charmchi, Amir Saman & Loy-Benitez, Jorge & Yang, Rebecca Jing & Yoo, ChangKyoo, 2022. "A data-driven analytical roadmap to a sustainable 2030 in South Korea based on optimal renewable microgrids," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    16. Domenech, John & Eveleigh, Timothy & Tanju, Bereket, 2018. "Marine Hydrokinetic (MHK) systems: Using systems thinking in resource characterization and estimating costs for the practical harvest of electricity from tidal currents," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 723-730.
    17. Kusakana, Kanzumba, 2014. "Techno-economic analysis of off-grid hydrokinetic-based hybrid energy systems for onshore/remote area in South Africa," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 947-957.
    18. de Faria, Victor A.D. & de Queiroz, Anderson R. & DeCarolis, Joseph F., 2022. "Optimizing offshore renewable portfolios under resource variability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    19. Faruk Guner & Hilmi Zenk, 2020. "Experimental, Numerical and Application Analysis of Hydrokinetic Turbine Performance with Fixed Rotating Blades," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-15, February.
    20. Paul Thedens & Roland Schmehl, 2023. "An Aero-Structural Model for Ram-Air Kite Simulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-18, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:220:y:2024:i:c:s0960148123016026. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.