IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v220y2024ics0960148123015495.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Thermodynamic model-based specification of optimal geothermal power generation system for high-temperature liquid-dominated systems using flash and flash-binary cycles

Author

Listed:
  • Pratama, Heru Berian
  • Koike, Katsuaki

Abstract

The utilization of high-temperature geothermal fluid for power generation requires the most suitable generation system to maximize the output with the highest efficiency. Single-flash, double-flash, and flash-binary cycles are the most representative systems for a reservoir with high-temperature geofluids. This study aims to develop a thermodynamic model-based method for selecting the optimal power generation system using criteria of power output and energy and exergy efficiencies. For this purpose, a thermodynamic model of the power generation system was constructed to calculate these values for high-temperature geofluids at 230–350 °C under steady-state conditions. The critical thermodynamic parameters that control these criteria include the separator pressure for the single and double flashers, working fluid, turbine inlet pressure, brine outlet temperature, and pinch point temperature, all of which are incorporated into the calculation. The results show that the flash-binary cycle generates the highest power; 21% higher than that of a single-flash cycle at the 5 °C pinch point, and 7% higher than a double-flash cycle. In addition to this merit, a cautious temperature of 120 °C is recommended for the cold reinjection fluid of a flash-binary cycle, which is considerably lower than that for the single- and double-flash cycles (164 °C).

Suggested Citation

  • Pratama, Heru Berian & Koike, Katsuaki, 2024. "Thermodynamic model-based specification of optimal geothermal power generation system for high-temperature liquid-dominated systems using flash and flash-binary cycles," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:220:y:2024:i:c:s0960148123015495
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2023.119634
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148123015495
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2023.119634?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zeyghami, Mehdi, 2015. "Performance analysis and binary working fluid selection of combined flash-binary geothermal cycle," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 765-774.
    2. Shokouhmand, H. & Atashkadi, P., 1997. "Performance improvement of a single, flashing, binary, combined cycle for geothermal powerplants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 22(7), pages 637-643.
    3. Gerber, Léda & Maréchal, François, 2012. "Environomic optimal configurations of geothermal energy conversion systems: Application to the future construction of Enhanced Geothermal Systems in Switzerland," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 45(1), pages 908-923.
    4. Paloso, G. & Mohanty, B., 1993. "A flashing binary combined cycle for geothermal power generation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 18(8), pages 803-814.
    5. Abdolalipouradl, Mehran & Mohammadkhani, Farzad & Khalilarya, Shahram, 2020. "A comparative analysis of novel combined flash-binary cycles for Sabalan geothermal wells: Thermodynamic and exergoeconomic viewpoints," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    6. Yari, Mortaza, 2010. "Exergetic analysis of various types of geothermal power plants," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 112-121.
    7. Pambudi, Nugroho Agung & Itoi, Ryuichi & Jalilinasrabady, Saeid & Jaelani, Khasani, 2015. "Performance improvement of a single-flash geothermal power plant in Dieng, Indonesia, upon conversion to a double-flash system using thermodynamic analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 424-431.
    8. Chen, Huijuan & Goswami, D. Yogi & Stefanakos, Elias K., 2010. "A review of thermodynamic cycles and working fluids for the conversion of low-grade heat," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 14(9), pages 3059-3067, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lee, Inkyu & Tester, Jefferson William & You, Fengqi, 2019. "Systems analysis, design, and optimization of geothermal energy systems for power production and polygeneration: State-of-the-art and future challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 551-577.
    2. Zhao, Yajing & Wang, Jiangfeng, 2016. "Exergoeconomic analysis and optimization of a flash-binary geothermal power system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 159-170.
    3. Chen, Ying & Liu, Yuxuan & Nam, Eun-Young & Zhang, Yang & Dahlak, Aida, 2023. "Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analysis and optimization of an integrated double-flash-binary geothermal system and dual-pressure ORC using zeotropic mixtures; multi-objective optimization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    4. Shengjun, Zhang & Huaixin, Wang & Tao, Guo, 2011. "Performance comparison and parametric optimization of subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and transcritical power cycle system for low-temperature geothermal power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(8), pages 2740-2754, August.
    5. Tang, Hao & Wu, Huagen & Wang, Xiaolin & Xing, Ziwen, 2015. "Performance study of a twin-screw expander used in a geothermal organic Rankine cycle power generator," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(P1), pages 631-642.
    6. Li, Tailu & Fu, Wencheng & Zhu, Jialing, 2014. "An integrated optimization for organic Rankine cycle based on entransy theory and thermodynamics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 561-573.
    7. Wang, Dabiao & Ma, Yuezheng & Tian, Ran & Duan, Jie & Hu, Busong & Shi, Lin, 2018. "Thermodynamic evaluation of an ORC system with a Low Pressure Saturated Steam heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 375-385.
    8. Vaccari, Marco & Pannocchia, Gabriele & Tognotti, Leonardo & Paci, Marco & Bonciani, Roberto, 2020. "A rigorous simulation model of geothermal power plants for emission control," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(C).
    9. Meng, Nan & Li, Tailu & Wang, Jianqiang & Jia, Yanan & Liu, Qinghua & Qin, Haosen, 2020. "Synergetic mechanism of fracture properties and system configuration on techno-economic performance of enhanced geothermal system for power generation during life cycle," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 910-924.
    10. Yi, Zhitong & Luo, Xianglong & Chen, Jianyong & Chen, Ying, 2017. "Mathematical modelling and optimization of a liquid separation condenser-based organic Rankine cycle used in waste heat utilization," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 916-934.
    11. Zhou, Yuhong & Li, Shanshan & Sun, Lei & Zhao, Shupeng & Ashraf Talesh, Seyed Saman, 2020. "Optimization and thermodynamic performance analysis of a power generation system based on geothermal flash and dual-pressure evaporation organic Rankine cycles using zeotropic mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    12. Mokarram, N. Hassani & Mosaffa, A.H., 2018. "A comparative study and optimization of enhanced integrated geothermal flash and Kalina cycles: A thermoeconomic assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 111-125.
    13. Lu, Xinli & Zhao, Yangyang & Zhu, Jialing & Zhang, Wei, 2018. "Optimization and applicability of compound power cycles for enhanced geothermal systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 229(C), pages 128-141.
    14. Moloney, Francesca & Almatrafi, Eydhah & Goswami, D.Y., 2020. "Working fluid parametric analysis for recuperative supercritical organic Rankine cycles for medium geothermal reservoir temperatures," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P3), pages 2874-2881.
    15. Wang, Dabiao & Dai, Xiaoye & Wu, Zhihua & Zhao, Wu & Wang, Puwei & Hu, Busong & Shi, Lin, 2020. "Design and testing of a 340 kW Organic Rankine Cycle system for Low Pressure Saturated Steam heat source," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    16. Tailu Li & Ruizhao Gao & Xiang Gao & Qinghua Liu, 2022. "Synergetic Effect of Non-Condensable Gas and Steam Quality on the Production Capacity of Geothermal Wells and Geothermal Power Generation for Hot Dry Rock," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-29, October.
    17. Zhou, Zongming & Cao, Yan & Anqi, Ali E. & Zoghi, Mohammad & Habibi, Hamed & Rajhi, Ali A. & Alamri, Sagr, 2022. "Converting a geothermal-driven steam flash cycle into a high-performance polygeneration system by waste heat recovery: 3E analysis and Genetic-Fgoalattain optimization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 609-627.
    18. Liu, Qiang & Duan, Yuanyuan & Yang, Zhen, 2013. "Performance analyses of geothermal organic Rankine cycles with selected hydrocarbon working fluids," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 123-132.
    19. Varma, G.V. Pradeep & Srinivas, T., 2017. "Power generation from low temperature heat recovery," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 75(C), pages 402-414.
    20. Zare, V. & Mahmoudi, S.M.S., 2015. "A thermodynamic comparison between organic Rankine and Kalina cycles for waste heat recovery from the Gas Turbine-Modular Helium Reactor," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 398-406.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:220:y:2024:i:c:s0960148123015495. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.