IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v178y2021icp334-343.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Highly sulfur tolerant and regenerable Pt/CeO2 catalyst for waste to energy

Author

Listed:
  • Lee, Yeol-Lim
  • Kim, Kyoung-Jin
  • Hong, Ga-Ram
  • Ahn, Seon-Yong
  • Kim, Beom-Jun
  • Shim, Jae-Oh
  • Roh, Hyun-Seog

Abstract

Water-gas shift reaction was applied to upcycle a waste-derived synthesis gas, which contains sulfur as an impurity. Pt/CeO2 was chosen as an appropriate catalyst through a metal and support screening study. The Pt/CeO2 catalyst showed stable catalytic activity without any deactivation for 100 h when the H2S was injected to 100 ppm, and still showed a sulfur tolerance even after 1,000 ppm of H2S was injected. In particular, the catalytic activity was fully regenerated when the H2S injection was stopped, regardless of the H2S concentration. The high sulfur tolerance and regeneration rate of Pt/CeO2 catalyst was due to the high oxygen storage capacity. This accelerates the redox mechanism of the water-gas shift reaction, and also helps the removal of the adsorbed sulfur on the Pt through the oxidation reaction with the mobile oxygen originated from the CeO2.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee, Yeol-Lim & Kim, Kyoung-Jin & Hong, Ga-Ram & Ahn, Seon-Yong & Kim, Beom-Jun & Shim, Jae-Oh & Roh, Hyun-Seog, 2021. "Highly sulfur tolerant and regenerable Pt/CeO2 catalyst for waste to energy," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 334-343.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:178:y:2021:i:c:p:334-343
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.084
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148121009502
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2021.06.084?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ronald W. Breault, 2010. "Gasification Processes Old and New: A Basic Review of the Major Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 3(2), pages 1-25, February.
    2. Lopes, E.J. & Okamura, L.A. & Maruyama, S.A. & Yamamoto, C.I., 2018. "Evaluation of energy gain from the segregation of organic materials from municipal solid waste in gasification processes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 116(PA), pages 623-629.
    3. Panigrahi, Sagarika & Dubey, Brajesh K., 2019. "A critical review on operating parameters and strategies to improve the biogas yield from anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 779-797.
    4. Gaeta-Bernardi, André & Parente, Virginia, 2016. "Organic municipal solid waste (MSW) as feedstock for biodiesel production: A financial feasibility analysis," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1422-1432.
    5. Lee, Yeol-Lim & Kim, Kyoung-Jin & Jang, Won-Jun & Shim, Jae-Oh & Jeon, Kyung-Won & Na, Hyun-Suk & Kim, Hak-Min & Bae, Jong Wook & Nam, Sung Chan & Jeon, Byong-Hun & Roh, Hyun-Seog, 2020. "Increase in stability of BaCo/CeO2 catalyst by optimizing the loading amount of Ba promoter for high-temperature water-gas shift reaction using waste-derived synthesis gas," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 2715-2722.
    6. Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Ghanavati, Hossein & Dashti, Behrouz B. & Heijungs, Reinout & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2017. "Electricity generation and GHG emission reduction potentials through different municipal solid waste management technologies: A comparative review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 414-439.
    7. Ibrahim, Muna Hassan & Hayyan, Maan & Hashim, Mohd Ali & Hayyan, Adeeb, 2017. "The role of ionic liquids in desulfurization of fuels: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 1534-1549.
    8. Khan, Imran & Kabir, Zobaidul, 2020. "Waste-to-energy generation technologies and the developing economies: A multi-criteria analysis for sustainability assessment," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 320-333.
    9. Wei, Yunmei & Li, Jingyuan & Shi, Dezhi & Liu, Guotao & Zhao, Youcai & Shimaoka, Takayuki, 2017. "Environmental challenges impeding the composting of biodegradable municipal solid waste: A critical review," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 51-65.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marta Wiśniewska & Andrzej Kulig & Krystyna Lelicińska-Serafin, 2021. "Odour Nuisance at Municipal Waste Biogas Plants and the Effect of Feedstock Modification on the Circular Economy—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-22, October.
    2. Ferraz de Campos, Victor Arruda & Silva, Valter Bruno & Cardoso, João Sousa & Brito, Paulo S. & Tuna, Celso Eduardo & Silveira, José Luz, 2021. "A review of waste management in Brazil and Portugal: Waste-to-energy as pathway for sustainable development," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 802-820.
    3. Kumar, Atul & Samadder, Sukha Ranjan, 2023. "Development of lower heating value prediction models and estimation of energy recovery potential of municipal solid waste and RDF incineration," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 274(C).
    4. Singh, Deval & Tembhare, Mamta & Machhirake, Nitesh & Kumar, Sunil, 2023. "Biogas generation potential of discarded food waste residue from ultra-processing activities at food manufacturing and packaging industry," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 263(PE).
    5. Mehrdad Massoudi & Ping Wang, 2013. "Slag Behavior in Gasifiers. Part II: Constitutive Modeling of Slag," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-32, February.
    6. Zachary Smith & Blesson Isaac & Jaya Shankar Tumuluru & Neal Yancey, 2023. "Grinding and Pelleting Characteristics of Municipal Solid Waste Fractions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-14, December.
    7. Khounani, Zahra & Hosseinzadeh-Bandbafha, Homa & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Sulaiman, Alawi & Goli, Sayed Amir Hossein & Tavassoli-Kafrani, Elham & Ghaffari, Akram & Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Kim, Ki-Hyun, 2020. "Unlocking the potential of walnut husk extract in the production of waste cooking oil-based biodiesel," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    8. Soltanian, Salman & Kalogirou, Soteris A. & Ranjbari, Meisam & Amiri, Hamid & Mahian, Omid & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Jafary, Tahereh & Nizami, Abdul-Sattar & Gupta, Vijai Kumar & Aghaei, Siavash & Pe, 2022. "Exergetic sustainability analysis of municipal solid waste treatment systems: A systematic critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    9. Charlotte Stead & Zia Wadud & Chris Nash & Hu Li, 2019. "Introduction of Biodiesel to Rail Transport: Lessons from the Road Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, February.
    10. Tonanzi, B. & Gallipoli, A. & Gianico, A. & Montecchio, D. & Pagliaccia, P. & Rossetti, S. & Braguglia, C.M., 2021. "Elucidating the key factors in semicontinuous anaerobic digestion of urban biowaste: The crucial role of sludge addition in process stability, microbial community enrichment and methane production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C), pages 272-284.
    11. Meerman, J.C. & Ramírez, A. & Turkenburg, W.C. & Faaij, A.P.C., 2011. "Performance of simulated flexible integrated gasification polygeneration facilities. Part A: A technical-energetic assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 15(6), pages 2563-2587, August.
    12. Safieddin Ardebili, Seyed Mohammad, 2020. "Green electricity generation potential from biogas produced by anaerobic digestion of farm animal waste and agriculture residues in Iran," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 29-37.
    13. Shu, Qing & Tang, Guoqiang & Lesmana, Herry & Zou, Laixi & Xiong, Daolin, 2018. "Preparation, characterization and application of a novel solid Brönsted acid catalyst SO42−/La3+/C for biodiesel production via esterification of oleic acid and methanol," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 253-261.
    14. Xuemeng Zhang & Chao Liu & Yuexi Chen & Guanghong Zheng & Yinguang Chen, 2022. "Source separation, transportation, pretreatment, and valorization of municipal solid waste: a critical review," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(10), pages 11471-11513, October.
    15. Aragon-Briceño, Christian & Pożarlik, Artur & Bramer, Eddy & Brem, Gerrit & Wang, Shule & Wen, Yuming & Yang, Weihong & Pawlak-Kruczek, Halina & Niedźwiecki, Łukasz & Urbanowska, Agnieszka & Mościcki,, 2022. "Integration of hydrothermal carbonization treatment for water and energy recovery from organic fraction of municipal solid waste digestate," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 577-591.
    16. Ping Wang & Mehrdad Massoudi, 2013. "Slag Behavior in Gasifiers. Part I: Influence of Coal Properties and Gasification Conditions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-23, February.
    17. Wainaina, Steven & Awasthi, Mukesh Kumar & Horváth, Ilona Sárvári & Taherzadeh, Mohammad J., 2020. "Anaerobic digestion of food waste to volatile fatty acids and hydrogen at high organic loading rates in immersed membrane bioreactors," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1140-1148.
    18. Koytsoumpa, Efthymia Ioanna & Karellas, Sotirios, 2018. "Equilibrium and kinetic aspects for catalytic methanation focusing on CO2 derived Substitute Natural Gas (SNG)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 536-550.
    19. Can, Ali, 2022. "Investigation of provincial capacity to produce biogas from waste disposal sites in Turkey," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    20. Javier Rodrigo-Ilarri & Claudia P. Romero & María-Elena Rodrigo-Clavero, 2020. "Land Use/Land Cover Assessment over Time Using a New Weighted Environmental Index (WEI) Based on an Object-Oriented Model and GIS Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-22, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:178:y:2021:i:c:p:334-343. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.