IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/renene/v165y2021ip2p1-13.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Heterogeneous acid catalyst preparation from olive pomace and its use for olive pomace oil esterification

Author

Listed:
  • Ayadi, Manel
  • Awad, Sary
  • Villot, Audrey
  • Abderrabba, Manef
  • Tazerout, Mohand

Abstract

Solid acid catalyst was produced from olive pomace (OP), characterized and used for the esterification of OP oil. OP was pyrolyzed, physical activated by steam and sulfonated using sulfuric acid. Commercial, coconut husk-based, activated carbon (CHAC) was also sulfonated for comparison. The activation has shown a significant increase in olive pomace activated carbon (OPAC) surface area by developing simultaneously its micro and meso-porosity. The sulfonation has further increased OPAC BET surface area to reach 618.18 m2/g and has changed its structure to become microporous. Sulfonation also removed tar residues and aliphatic hydrocarbons from OPAC’s surface. Tendencies observed with carbon CHAC, used for comparison, are slightly different with a mesoporosity development. Although its higher surface area (1227.01 m2/g), CHAC has fixed three times less sulfur than OPAC, which can be attributed to its higher hydrophobicity or pore distribution. Sulfur was mainly fixed in the form of sulfonic acid (SO3H). Esterification with methanol using produced solid catalysts decreased OPO acidity below the 2 mgKOH/g threshold after 5 h of reaction and reduced mono, di and triglycerides to levels close to the ones required by European norm EN14214.

Suggested Citation

  • Ayadi, Manel & Awad, Sary & Villot, Audrey & Abderrabba, Manef & Tazerout, Mohand, 2021. "Heterogeneous acid catalyst preparation from olive pomace and its use for olive pomace oil esterification," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(P2), pages 1-13.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:165:y:2021:i:p2:p:1-13
    DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2020.11.031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0960148120317729
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.renene.2020.11.031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Skoulou, V. & Zabaniotou, A., 2007. "Investigation of agricultural and animal wastes in Greece and their allocation to potential application for energy production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 11(8), pages 1698-1719, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Sangsiri, Pimpajee & Laosiripojana, Navadol & Daorattanachai, Pornlada, 2022. "Synthesis of sulfonated carbon-based catalysts from organosolv lignin and methanesulfonic acid: Its activity toward esterification of stearic acid," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 113-127.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bujak, Janusz Wojciech, 2015. "New insights into waste management – Meat industry," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 83(C), pages 1174-1186.
    2. Janusz Bujak & Piotr Sitarz & Magdalena Nakielska, 2020. "Multidimensional Analysis of Meat and Bone Meal (MBM) Incineration Process," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-9, November.
    3. Aravani, Vasiliki P. & Sun, Hangyu & Yang, Ziyi & Liu, Guangqing & Wang, Wen & Anagnostopoulos, George & Syriopoulos, George & Charisiou, Nikolaos D. & Goula, Maria A. & Kornaros, Michael & Papadakis,, 2022. "Agricultural and livestock sector's residues in Greece & China: Comparative qualitative and quantitative characterization for assessing their potential for biogas production," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    4. Lerkkasemsan, Nuttapol, 2017. "Fuzzy logic-based predictive model for biomass pyrolysis," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(P2), pages 1019-1030.
    5. Avcıoğlu, A.O. & Dayıoğlu, M.A. & Türker, U., 2019. "Assessment of the energy potential of agricultural biomass residues in Turkey," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 610-619.
    6. Nunes, L.J.R. & Causer, T.P. & Ciolkosz, D., 2020. "Biomass for energy: A review on supply chain management models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    7. Rentizelas, Athanasios A. & Tolis, Athanasios J. & Tatsiopoulos, Ilias P., 2009. "Logistics issues of biomass: The storage problem and the multi-biomass supply chain," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 13(4), pages 887-894, May.
    8. Tao, Guangcan & Geladi, Paul & Lestander, Torbjörn A. & Xiong, Shaojun, 2012. "Biomass properties in association with plant species and assortments. II: A synthesis based on literature data for ash elements," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 3507-3522.
    9. Svanberg, Martin & Ellis, Joanne & Lundgren, Joakim & Landälv, Ingvar, 2018. "Renewable methanol as a fuel for the shipping industry," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 1217-1228.
    10. Karampinis, E. & Nikolopoulos, N. & Nikolopoulos, A. & Grammelis, P. & Kakaras, E., 2012. "Numerical investigation Greek lignite/cardoon co-firing in a tangentially fired furnace," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 514-524.
    11. Di Giacomo, G. & Taglieri, L., 2009. "Renewable energy benefits with conversion of woody residues to pellets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 724-731.
    12. Mosayeb Dashtpeyma & Reza Ghodsi, 2021. "Forest Biomass and Bioenergy Supply Chain Resilience: A Systematic Literature Review on the Barriers and Enablers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-21, June.
    13. Paraskevopoulou, Christina & Vlachos, Dimitrios & Bechtsis, Dimitrios & Tsolakis, Naoum, 2022. "An assessment of circular economy interventions in the peach canning industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 249(C).
    14. Awudu, Iddrisu & Zhang, Jun, 2012. "Uncertainties and sustainability concepts in biofuel supply chain management: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(2), pages 1359-1368.
    15. Mourmouris, J.C. & Potolias, C., 2013. "A multi-criteria methodology for energy planning and developing renewable energy sources at a regional level: A case study Thassos, Greece," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 52(C), pages 522-530.
    16. Tao, Guangcan & Lestander, Torbjörn A. & Geladi, Paul & Xiong, Shaojun, 2012. "Biomass properties in association with plant species and assortments I: A synthesis based on literature data of energy properties," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 16(5), pages 3481-3506.
    17. Tripathi, Manoj & Sahu, J.N. & Ganesan, P., 2016. "Effect of process parameters on production of biochar from biomass waste through pyrolysis: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 467-481.
    18. Nikoletta Solomakou & Aikaterini M. Drosaki & Kyriakos Kaderides & Ioannis Mourtzinos & Athanasia M. Goula, 2024. "Valorization of Peach By-Products: Utilizing Them as Valuable Resources in a Circular Economy Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-27, February.
    19. Akter, Mst. Mahmoda & Surovy, Israt Zahan & Sultana, Nazmin & Faruk, Md. Omar & Gilroyed, Brandon H. & Tijing, Leonard & Arman, & Didar-ul-Alam, Md. & Shon, Ho Kyong & Nam, Sang Yong & Kabir, Mohammad, 2024. "Techno-economics and environmental sustainability of agricultural biomass-based energy potential," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
    20. Kayakutlu, Gulgun & Daim, Tugrul & Kunt, Meltem & Altay, Ayca & Suharto, Yulianto, 2017. "Scenarios for regional waste management," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 1323-1335.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:renene:v:165:y:2021:i:p2:p:1-13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.journals.elsevier.com/renewable-energy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.