IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v94y2009i2p418-431.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Predictive maintenance policy for a gradually deteriorating system subject to stress

Author

Listed:
  • Deloux, E.
  • Castanier, B.
  • Bérenguer, C.

Abstract

This paper deals with a predictive maintenance policy for a continuously deteriorating system subject to stress. We consider a system with two failure mechanisms which are, respectively, due to an excessive deterioration level and a shock. To optimize the maintenance policy of the system, an approach combining statistical process control (SPC) and condition-based maintenance (CBM) is proposed. CBM policy is used to inspect and replace the system according to the observed deterioration level. SPC is used to monitor the stress covariate. In order to assess the performance of the proposed maintenance policy and to minimize the long-run expected maintenance cost per unit of time, a mathematical model for the maintained system cost is derived. Analysis based on numerical results are conducted to highlight the properties of the proposed maintenance policy in respect to the different maintenance parameters.

Suggested Citation

  • Deloux, E. & Castanier, B. & Bérenguer, C., 2009. "Predictive maintenance policy for a gradually deteriorating system subject to stress," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(2), pages 418-431.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:94:y:2009:i:2:p:418-431
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2008.04.002
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832008001336
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2008.04.002?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Linderman, Kevin & McKone-Sweet, Kathleen E. & Anderson, John C., 2005. "An integrated systems approach to process control and maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 164(2), pages 324-340, July.
    2. Scarf, Philip A., 1997. "On the application of mathematical models in maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 99(3), pages 493-506, June.
    3. Wang, Hongzhou, 2002. "A survey of maintenance policies of deteriorating systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 139(3), pages 469-489, June.
    4. Wang, Wenbin, 2007. "A two-stage prognosis model in condition based maintenance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 182(3), pages 1177-1187, November.
    5. Ben-Daya, M. & Rahim, M. A., 2000. "Effect of maintenance on the economic design of -control chart," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 131-143, January.
    6. Zuckerman, Dror, 1978. "Optimal replacement policy for the case where the damage process is a one-sided Lévy process," Stochastic Processes and their Applications, Elsevier, vol. 7(2), pages 141-151, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiang, Yisha, 2013. "Joint optimization of X¯ control chart and preventive maintenance policies: A discrete-time Markov chain approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 229(2), pages 382-390.
    2. Si, Xiao-Sheng & Wang, Wenbin & Hu, Chang-Hua & Zhou, Dong-Hua, 2011. "Remaining useful life estimation - A review on the statistical data driven approaches," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 213(1), pages 1-14, August.
    3. Wu, Shaomin & Scarf, Philip, 2015. "Decline and repair, and covariate effects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 244(1), pages 219-226.
    4. Zhengxin Zhang & Xiaosheng Si & Changhua Hu & Xiangyu Kong, 2015. "Degradation modeling–based remaining useful life estimation: A review on approaches for systems with heterogeneity," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 229(4), pages 343-355, August.
    5. van Noortwijk, J.M., 2009. "A survey of the application of gamma processes in maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(1), pages 2-21.
    6. Dimitrakos, T.D. & Kyriakidis, E.G., 2008. "A semi-Markov decision algorithm for the maintenance of a production system with buffer capacity and continuous repair times," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 111(2), pages 752-762, February.
    7. Kurt, Murat & Kharoufeh, Jeffrey P., 2010. "Optimally maintaining a Markovian deteriorating system with limited imperfect repairs," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(2), pages 368-380, September.
    8. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    9. Wang, Wenbin, 2012. "An overview of the recent advances in delay-time-based maintenance modelling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 165-178.
    10. Wu, Shaomin & Clements-Croome, Derek, 2005. "Preventive maintenance models with random maintenance quality," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 99-105.
    11. Karamatsoukis, C.C. & Kyriakidis, E.G., 2010. "Optimal maintenance of two stochastically deteriorating machines with an intermediate buffer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(1), pages 297-308, November.
    12. Ho, Linda Lee & Quinino, Roberto C., 2012. "Integrating on-line process control and imperfect corrective maintenance: An economical design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 222(2), pages 253-262.
    13. Ponchet, Amélie & Fouladirad, Mitra & Grall, Antoine, 2010. "Assessment of a maintenance model for a multi-deteriorating mode system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(11), pages 1244-1254.
    14. Panagiotidou, Sofia & Nenes, George, 2009. "An economically designed, integrated quality and maintenance model using an adaptive Shewhart chart," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(3), pages 732-741.
    15. Kyriakidis, E.G. & Dimitrakos, T.D., 2006. "Optimal preventive maintenance of a production system with an intermediate buffer," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 168(1), pages 86-99, January.
    16. M. A. Pasha & M. Bameni Moghadam & M. A. Rahim, 2020. "Effects of non-normal quality data on the integrated model of imperfect maintenance, early replacement, and economic design of $${\bar{X}}$$ X ¯ -control charts," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 20(4), pages 2519-2536, December.
    17. Bouslah, B. & Gharbi, A. & Pellerin, R., 2016. "Joint economic design of production, continuous sampling inspection and preventive maintenance of a deteriorating production system," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 184-198.
    18. Gia-Shie Liu, 2019. "A Group Replacement Decision Support System Based on Internet of Things," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 7(9), pages 1-23, September.
    19. Zhang, Zhengxin & Si, Xiaosheng & Hu, Changhua & Lei, Yaguo, 2018. "Degradation data analysis and remaining useful life estimation: A review on Wiener-process-based methods," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 775-796.
    20. Taghipour, Sharareh & Banjevic, Dragan, 2012. "Optimal inspection of a complex system subject to periodic and opportunistic inspections and preventive replacements," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 220(3), pages 649-660.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:94:y:2009:i:2:p:418-431. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.