IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v123y2014icp137-144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

AK-SYS: An adaptation of the AK-MCS method for system reliability

Author

Listed:
  • Fauriat, W.
  • Gayton, N.

Abstract

A lot of research work has been proposed over the last two decades to evaluate the probability of failure of a structure involving a very time-consuming mechanical model. Surrogate model approaches based on Kriging, such as the Efficient Global Reliability Analysis (EGRA) or the Active learning and Kriging-based Monte-Carlo Simulation (AK-MCS) methods, are very efficient and each has advantages of its own. EGRA is well suited to evaluating small probabilities, as the surrogate can be used to classify any population. AK-MCS is built in relation to a given population and requires no optimization program for the active learning procedure to be performed. It is therefore easier to implement and more likely to spend computational effort on areas with a significant probability content. When assessing system reliability, analytical approaches and first-order approximation are widely used in the literature. However, in the present paper we rather focus on sampling techniques and, considering the recent adaptation of the EGRA method for systems, a strategy is presented to adapt the AK-MCS method for system reliability. The AK-SYS method, “Active learning and Kriging-based SYStem reliability method†, is presented. Its high efficiency and accuracy are illustrated via various examples.

Suggested Citation

  • Fauriat, W. & Gayton, N., 2014. "AK-SYS: An adaptation of the AK-MCS method for system reliability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 137-144.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:123:y:2014:i:c:p:137-144
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2013.10.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832013002949
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2013.10.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Echard, B. & Gayton, N. & Lemaire, M. & Relun, N., 2013. "A combined Importance Sampling and Kriging reliability method for small failure probabilities with time-demanding numerical models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 232-240.
    2. Bichon, Barron J. & McFarland, John M. & Mahadevan, Sankaran, 2011. "Efficient surrogate models for reliability analysis of systems with multiple failure modes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(10), pages 1386-1395.
    3. Kang, Won-Hee & Song, Junho & Gardoni, Paolo, 2008. "Matrix-based system reliability method and applications to bridge networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(11), pages 1584-1593.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiao, Mi & Zhang, Jinhao & Gao, Liang, 2020. "A system active learning Kriging method for system reliability-based design optimization with a multiple response model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    2. Menz, Morgane & Gogu, Christian & Dubreuil, Sylvain & Bartoli, Nathalie & Morio, Jérôme, 2020. "Adaptive coupling of reduced basis modeling and Kriging based active learning methods for reliability analyses," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    3. Gaspar, B. & Teixeira, A.P. & Guedes Soares, C., 2017. "Adaptive surrogate model with active refinement combining Kriging and a trust region method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 277-291.
    4. Wei, Pengfei & Liu, Fuchao & Tang, Chenghu, 2018. "Reliability and reliability-based importance analysis of structural systems using multiple response Gaussian process model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 183-195.
    5. Jiang, Chen & Qiu, Haobo & Gao, Liang & Wang, Dapeng & Yang, Zan & Chen, Liming, 2020. "EEK-SYS: System reliability analysis through estimation error-guided adaptive Kriging approximation of multiple limit state surfaces," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    6. Yang, Seonghyeok & Lee, Mingyu & Lee, Ikjin, 2023. "A new sampling approach for system reliability-based design optimization under multiple simulation models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    7. Yang, Seonghyeok & Jo, Hwisang & Lee, Kyungeun & Lee, Ikjin, 2022. "Expected system improvement (ESI): A new learning function for system reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    8. Dehghani, Nariman L. & Zamanian, Soroush & Shafieezadeh, Abdollah, 2021. "Adaptive network reliability analysis: Methodology and applications to power grid," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    9. Guo, Qing & Liu, Yongshou & Chen, Bingqian & Yao, Qin, 2021. "A variable and mode sensitivity analysis method for structural system using a novel active learning Kriging model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    10. Chen, Zequan & He, Jialong & Li, Guofa & Yang, Zhaojun & Wang, Tianzhe & Du, Xuejiao, 2024. "Fast convergence strategy for adaptive structural reliability analysis based on kriging believer criterion and importance sampling," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).
    11. Zhao, Wei & Fan, Feng & Wang, Wei, 2017. "Non-linear partial least squares response surface method for structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 69-77.
    12. Jian, Wang & Zhili, Sun & Qiang, Yang & Rui, Li, 2017. "Two accuracy measures of the Kriging model for structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 494-505.
    13. Kroetz, H.M. & Moustapha, M. & Beck, A.T. & Sudret, B., 2020. "A Two-Level Kriging-Based Approach with Active Learning for Solving Time-Variant Risk Optimization Problems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    14. Zhang, Jinhao & Gao, Liang & Xiao, Mi, 2020. "A composite-projection-outline-based approximation method for system reliability analysis with hybrid uncertainties," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    15. Sun, Zhili & Wang, Jian & Li, Rui & Tong, Cao, 2017. "LIF: A new Kriging based learning function and its application to structural reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 152-165.
    16. Wang, Jian & Sun, Zhili & Cao, Runan, 2021. "An efficient and robust Kriging-based method for system reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    17. Yang, Xufeng & Liu, Yongshou & Mi, Caiying & Tang, Chenghu, 2018. "System reliability analysis through active learning Kriging model with truncated candidate region," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 169(C), pages 235-241.
    18. Yuan, Kai & Xiao, Ning-Cong & Wang, Zhonglai & Shang, Kun, 2020. "System reliability analysis by combining structure function and active learning kriging model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    19. Xiongxiong You & Mengya Zhang & Diyin Tang & Zhanwen Niu, 2022. "An active learning method combining adaptive kriging and weighted penalty for structural reliability analysis," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 236(1), pages 160-172, February.
    20. Taflanidis, Alexandros A. & Loukogeorgaki, Eva & Angelides, Demos C., 2013. "Offshore wind turbine risk quantification/evaluation under extreme environmental conditions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 19-32.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:123:y:2014:i:c:p:137-144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.