IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v200y2020ics0951832018308597.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A case study of agile software development for safety-Critical systems projects

Author

Listed:
  • Islam, Gibrail
  • Storer, Tim

Abstract

This study explores the introduction of agile software development within an avionics company engaged in safety-critical system engineering. There is increasing pressure throughout the software industry for development efforts to adopt agile software development in order to respond more rapidly to changing requirements and make more frequent deliveries of systems to customers for review and integration. This pressure is also being experienced in safety-critical industries, where release cycles on typically large and complex systems may run to several years on projects spanning decades. However, safety-critical system developments are normally highly regulated, which may constrain the adoption of agile software development or require adaptation of selected methods or practices. To investigate this potential conflict, we conducted a series of interviews with practitioners in the company, exploring their experiences of adopting agile software development and the challenges encountered. The study also explores the opportunities for altering the existing software process in the company to better fit agile software development to the constraints of software development for safety-critical systems. We conclude by identifying immediate future research directions to better align the tempo of software development for safety-critical systems and agile software development.

Suggested Citation

  • Islam, Gibrail & Storer, Tim, 2020. "A case study of agile software development for safety-Critical systems projects," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:200:y:2020:i:c:s0951832018308597
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2020.106954
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832018308597
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2020.106954?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Christoph Schmidt, 2016. "Agile Software Development," Progress in IS, in: Agile Software Development Teams, chapter 0, pages 7-35, Springer.
    2. Kieran Conboy, 2009. "Agility from First Principles: Reconstructing the Concept of Agility in Information Systems Development," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 329-354, September.
    3. Daniel Turk & France. Robert & Bernhard Rumpe, 2005. "Assumptions Underlying Agile Software-Development Processes," Journal of Database Management (JDM), IGI Global, vol. 16(4), pages 62-87, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Rasheed Gbenga Jimoh & Olayinka Olufunmilayo Olusanya & Joseph Bamidele Awotunde & Agbotiname Lucky Imoize & Cheng-Chi Lee, 2022. "Identification of Risk Factors Using ANFIS-Based Security Risk Assessment Model for SDLC Phases," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-21, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gupta, Manjul & George, Joey F. & Xia, Weidong, 2019. "Relationships between IT department culture and agile software development practices: An empirical investigation," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 44(C), pages 13-24.
    2. Peter J. Carew & David Glynn, 2017. "Anti-patterns in Agile Adoption: A Grounded Theory Case Study of One Irish IT Organisation," Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, Springer;Global Institute of Flexible Systems Management, vol. 18(4), pages 275-289, December.
    3. Harry Bouwman & Jukka Heikkilä & Marikka Heikkilä & Carlo Leopold & Timber Haaker, 2018. "Achieving agility using business model stress testing," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 28(2), pages 149-162, May.
    4. Tobias Knabke & Sebastian Olbrich, 2018. "Building novel capabilities to enable business intelligence agility: results from a quantitative study," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 493-546, August.
    5. Florin DUMITRIU & Gabriela MESNITA & Laura Diana RADU, 2019. "Challenges and Solutions of Applying Large-Scale Agile at Organization-al Level," Informatica Economica, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 23(3), pages 61-71.
    6. Berea Cristi, 2018. "Negotiation Analysis. The Context," Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, Ovidius University of Constantza, Faculty of Economic Sciences, vol. 0(1), pages 284-288, July.
    7. C. J. Torrecilla-Salinas & O. Troyer & M. J. Escalona & M. Mejías, 2019. "A Delphi-based expert judgment method applied to the validation of a mature Agile framework for Web development projects," Information Technology and Management, Springer, vol. 20(1), pages 9-40, March.
    8. Marinho, Marcelo & Amorim, Luís & Camara, Rafael & Oliveira, Brigitte Renata & Sobral, Marcos & Sampaio, Suzana, 2021. "Happier and further by going together: The importance of software team behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    9. Čelesnik Goran & Radujković Mladen & Vrečko Igor, 2018. "Resolving Companies in Crisis: Agile Crisis Project Management," Organizacija, Sciendo, vol. 51(4), pages 223-237, December.
    10. Richard Vidgen & Xiaofeng Wang, 2009. "Coevolving Systems and the Organization of Agile Software Development," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 20(3), pages 355-376, September.
    11. Appiah, Gloria & Bonsu, Samuel K. & Sarpong, David, 2021. "The unpowered customer: Co-creation as tactics of the weak," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 317-326.
    12. Pinho, Celso R.A. & Pinho, Maria Luiza C.A. & Deligonul, Seyda Z. & Tamer Cavusgil, S., 2022. "The agility construct in the literature: Conceptualization and bibliometric assessment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 517-532.
    13. Damjan Vavpotič & Marko Robnik-Šikonja & Tomaž Hovelja, 2020. "Exploring the Relations Between Net Benefits of IT Projects and CIOs’ Perception of Quality of Software Development Disciplines," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 62(4), pages 347-360, August.
    14. Thomas Kude & Sunil Mithas & Christoph T. Schmidt & Armin Heinzl, 2019. "How Pair Programming Influences Team Performance: The Role of Backup Behavior, Shared Mental Models, and Task Novelty," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 30(4), pages 1145-1163, December.
    15. Shikha Sharma & Sanjeev K. Sharma, 2020. "Probing the Links Between Team Resilience, Competitive Advantage, and Organizational Effectiveness: Evidence from Information Technology Industry," Business Perspectives and Research, , vol. 8(2), pages 289-307, July.
    16. Bruno Francisco Diniz Marinho & Isotilia Costa Melo, 2022. "Fostering Innovative SMEs in a Developing Country: The ALI Program Experience," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-16, October.
    17. , Aisdl, 2020. "The Serendipity Mindset," OSF Preprints w52y9, Center for Open Science.
    18. Robert Modransky & Silvia Jakabova & Michal Hanak & Albert Olah, 2020. "Lean and Agile Project Management and the Challenges for its Implementation in SMEs in Czech Republic," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 9(1), pages 413-440, July.
    19. Mohamed Amine Ferrag & Leandros Maglaras & Abdelouahid Derhab & Helge Janicke, 2020. "Authentication schemes for smart mobile devices: threat models, countermeasures, and open research issues," Telecommunication Systems: Modelling, Analysis, Design and Management, Springer, vol. 73(2), pages 317-348, February.
    20. Asif Qumer Gill & Brian Henderson-Sellers & Mahmood Niazi, 2018. "Scaling for agility: A reference model for hybrid traditional-agile software development methodologies," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(2), pages 315-341, April.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:200:y:2020:i:c:s0951832018308597. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.