IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v159y2017icp24-36.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An integrated approach to estimate storage reliability with initial failures based on E-Bayesian estimates

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Yongjin
  • Zhao, Ming
  • Zhang, Shitao
  • Wang, Jiamei
  • Zhang, Yanjun

Abstract

Storage reliability that measures the ability of products in a dormant state to keep their required functions is studied in this paper. For certain types of products, Storage reliability may not always be 100% at the beginning of storage, unlike the operational reliability, which exist possible initial failures that are normally neglected in the models of storage reliability. In this paper, a new integrated technique, the non-parametric measure based on the E-Bayesian estimates of current failure probabilities is combined with the parametric measure based on the exponential reliability function, is proposed to estimate and predict the storage reliability of products with possible initial failures, where the non-parametric method is used to estimate the number of failed products and the reliability at each testing time, and the parameter method is used to estimate the initial reliability and the failure rate of storage product. The proposed method has taken into consideration that, the reliability test data of storage products containing the unexamined before and during the storage process, is available for providing more accurate estimates of both the initial failure probability and the storage failure probability. When storage reliability prediction that is the main concern in this field should be made, the non-parametric estimates of failure numbers can be used into the parametric models for the failure process in storage. In the case of exponential models, the assessment and prediction method for storage reliability is presented in this paper. Finally, a numerical example is given to illustrate the method. Furthermore, a detailed comparison between the proposed and traditional method, for examining the rationality of assessment and prediction on the storage reliability, is investigated. The results should be useful for planning a storage environment, decision-making concerning the maximum length of storage, and identifying the production quality.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Yongjin & Zhao, Ming & Zhang, Shitao & Wang, Jiamei & Zhang, Yanjun, 2017. "An integrated approach to estimate storage reliability with initial failures based on E-Bayesian estimates," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 24-36.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:159:y:2017:i:c:p:24-36
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.024
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832016307219
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2016.10.024?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Doostparast, Mohammad & Kolahan, Farhad & Doostparast, Mahdi, 2014. "A reliability-based approach to optimize preventive maintenance scheduling for coherent systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 98-106.
    2. Wang, Zhaoqiang & Hu, Changhua & Wang, Wenbin & Zhou, Zhijie & Si, Xiaosheng, 2014. "A case study of remaining storage life prediction using stochastic filtering with the influence of condition monitoring," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 186-195.
    3. Mirzahosseinian, H. & Piplani, R., 2011. "A study of repairable parts inventory system operating under performance-based contract," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 214(2), pages 256-261, October.
    4. Berrade, M.D. & Scarf, P.A. & Cavalcante, C.A.V. & Dwight, R.A., 2013. "Imperfect inspection and replacement of a system with a defective state: A cost and reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 80-87.
    5. Nakagawa, T. & Mizutani, S. & Chen, M., 2010. "A summary of periodic and random inspection policies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(8), pages 906-911.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fang Liu & Hua Gong & Ligang Cai & Ke Xu, 2019. "Prediction of Ammunition Storage Reliability Based on Improved Ant Colony Algorithm and BP Neural Network," Complexity, Hindawi, vol. 2019, pages 1-13, March.
    2. Wang, Wei & Wu, Zhiying & Xiong, Junlin & Xu, Yaofeng, 2018. "Redundancy optimization of cold-standby systems under periodic inspection and maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 394-402.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin, Zu-Liang & Huang, Yeu-Shiang & Fang, Chih-Chiang, 2015. "Non-periodic preventive maintenance with reliability thresholds for complex repairable systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 145-156.
    2. Yang, Li & Ma, Xiaobing & Zhai, Qingqing & Zhao, Yu, 2016. "A delay time model for a mission-based system subject to periodic and random inspection and postponed replacement," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 96-104.
    3. Zhao, Qian Qian & Yun, Won Young, 2019. "Storage availability of one-shot system under periodic inspection considering inspection error," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 186(C), pages 120-133.
    4. Hu, Yang & Baraldi, Piero & Di Maio, Francesco & Zio, Enrico, 2015. "A particle filtering and kernel smoothing-based approach for new design component prognostics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 19-31.
    5. Zhang, Fengxia & Shen, Jingyuan & Liao, Haitao & Ma, Yizhong, 2021. "Optimal preventive maintenance policy for a system subject to two-phase imperfect inspections," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    6. Driessen, J.P.C. & Peng, H. & van Houtum, G.J., 2017. "Maintenance optimization under non-constant probabilities of imperfect inspections," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 115-123.
    7. Yang, Li & Ma, Xiaobing & Peng, Rui & Zhai, Qingqing & Zhao, Yu, 2017. "A preventive maintenance policy based on dependent two-stage deterioration and external shocks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 201-211.
    8. Jiang, Junwei & An, Youjun & Dong, Yuanfa & Hu, Jiawen & Li, Yinghe & Zhao, Ziye, 2023. "Integrated optimization of non-permutation flow shop scheduling and maintenance planning with variable processing speed," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    9. Shey-Huei Sheu & Hsin-Nan Tsai & Tsung-Shin Hsu & Fu-Kwun Wang, 2015. "Optimal number of minimal repairs before replacement of a deteriorating system with inspections," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 46(8), pages 1367-1379, June.
    10. Zhang, Nan & Cai, Kaiquan & Zhang, Jun & Wang, Tian, 2022. "A condition-based maintenance policy considering failure dependence and imperfect inspection for a two-component system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 217(C).
    11. Zhou, Yifan & Lin, Tian Ran & Sun, Yong & Bian, Yangqing & Ma, Lin, 2015. "An effective approach to reducing strategy space for maintenance optimisation of multistate series–parallel systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 40-53.
    12. Qin, Xuwei & Jiang, Zhong-Zhong & Sun, Minghe & Tang, Liang & Liu, Xiaoran, 2021. "Repairable spare parts provisioning for multiregional expanding fleets of equipment under performance-based contracting," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 102(C).
    13. Alberti, Alexandre R. & Cavalcante, Cristiano A.V. & Scarf, Philip & Silva, André L.O., 2018. "Modelling inspection and replacement quality for a protection system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 145-153.
    14. de Jonge, Bram & Teunter, Ruud & Tinga, Tiedo, 2017. "The influence of practical factors on the benefits of condition-based maintenance over time-based maintenance," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 21-30.
    15. Alaswad, Suzan & Xiang, Yisha, 2017. "A review on condition-based maintenance optimization models for stochastically deteriorating system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 54-63.
    16. Wang, Yulan & Wallace, Stein W. & Shen, Bin & Choi, Tsan-Ming, 2015. "Service supply chain management: A review of operational models," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(3), pages 685-698.
    17. Cavalcante, C.A.V. & Lopes, R.S. & Scarf, P.A., 2018. "A general inspection and opportunistic replacement policy for one-component systems of variable quality," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 266(3), pages 911-919.
    18. Qin, Xuwei & Shao, Lusheng & Jiang, Zhong-Zhong, 2020. "Contract design for equipment after-sales service with business interruption insurance," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 284(1), pages 176-187.
    19. Badía, F.G. & Berrade, M.D. & Cha, Ji Hwan & Lee, Hyunju, 2018. "Optimal replacement policy under a general failure and repair model: Minimal versus worse than old repair," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 362-372.
    20. Akcay, Alp, 2022. "An alert-assisted inspection policy for a production process with imperfect condition signals," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 298(2), pages 510-525.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:159:y:2017:i:c:p:24-36. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.