IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v145y2016icp136-146.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The cost for meeting SLA dependability requirements; implications for customers and providers

Author

Listed:
  • Følstad, Eirik L.
  • Helvik, Bjarne E.

Abstract

A Service Level Agreement (SLA) describes the service, the service-level objectives (SLOs), the price the customer should pay and the compensation if the SLOs are not met. There is a trade-off for the provider between the costs for improving the deployed service quality vs. probability of paying compensation. We propose how to estimate the provider׳s optimal service deployment. We show that the optimal deployed service quality is dependent on the SLOs, deployment cost, compensation and observation interval. A service deployment based on cost optimization results in targeted dependability objective values that are significantly better than stated in the SLOs. The proposed approach provides valuable insight for an aggregator, who buys services from other providers, to negotiate adequate SLOs, price and compensation from the providers to make a valuable offer for its own customers.

Suggested Citation

  • Følstad, Eirik L. & Helvik, Bjarne E., 2016. "The cost for meeting SLA dependability requirements; implications for customers and providers," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 136-146.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:145:y:2016:i:c:p:136-146
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.09.011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832015002756
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2015.09.011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bobbio, A. & Bonanni, G. & Ciancamerla, E. & Clemente, R. & Iacomini, A. & Minichino, M. & Scarlatti, A. & Terruggia, R. & Zendri, E., 2010. "Unavailability of critical SCADA communication links interconnecting a power grid and a Telco network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(12), pages 1345-1357.
    2. Ocde, 2013. "L'innovation verte dans les services touristiques," Études de l'OCDE sur le tourisme 2013/1, OECD Publishing.
    3. Yemelyanova K. S., 2013. "Methods of a cruise tourism services quality evaluation," Вісник економіки транспорту і промисловості, CyberLeninka;Украинская государственная академия железнодорожного транспорта, issue 41, pages 158-161.
    4. Michel Lander & P. P. M. A. R. Heugens, 2013. "Dual paths to professional service firm performance," Working Papers hal-00808734, HAL.
    5. Oecd, 2013. "Green Innovation in Tourism Services," OECD Tourism Papers 2013/1, OECD Publishing.
    6. Markovic, Dragan S. & Zivkovic, Dejan & Branovic, Irina & Popovic, Ranko & Cvetkovic, Dragan, 2013. "Smart power grid and cloud computing," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 566-577.
    7. ., 2013. "Infrastructure and essential services," Chapters, in: The Political Economy of Iraq, chapter 11, pages 209-229, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    8. Ouyang, Min, 2014. "Review on modeling and simulation of interdependent critical infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 43-60.
    9. Marta Rojo & Luigi dell'Olio & Hernán Gonzalo-Orden & Ángel Ibeas, 2013. "Interurban bus service quality from the users' viewpoint," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 36(7), pages 599-616, October.
    10. Rema Gopalan & Sreekumar, 2013. "An empirical assessment of retail service quality in India," International Journal of Indian Culture and Business Management, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 7(2), pages 240-260.
    11. Maciejewski, Henryk & Caban, Dariusz, 2008. "Estimation of repairable system availability within fixed time horizon," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(1), pages 100-106.
    12. Ntalampiras, Stavros & Soupionis, Yannis & Giannopoulos, Georgios, 2015. "A fault diagnosis system for interdependent critical infrastructures based on HMMs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 73-81.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Loretta Mastroeni & Alessandro Mazzoccoli & Maurizio Naldi, 2022. "Pricing Cat Bonds for Cloud Service Failures," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, October.
    2. Pietrantuono, Roberto & Popov, Peter & Russo, Stefano, 2020. "Reliability assessment of service-based software under operational profile uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    3. Ashutosh Sharma & Rajiv Kumar & Manar Wasif Abu Talib & Saurabh Srivastava & Razi Iqbal, 2019. "Network modelling and computation of quickest path for service-level agreements using bi-objective optimization," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 15(10), pages 15501477198, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dobat, Thomas & Hertel, Stefanie & Renninger, Wolfgang, 2017. "Herausforderungen und Erfolgsfaktoren bei der Einführung Cloud-basierter Unternehmenssoftware: Erfahrungen aus der Praxis," Weidener Diskussionspapiere 60, University of Applied Sciences Amberg-Weiden (OTH).
    2. Zio, Enrico, 2016. "Challenges in the vulnerability and risk analysis of critical infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 137-150.
    3. Stoeckl, Natalie & Farr, Marina & Larson, Silva & Adams, Vanessa M. & Kubiszewski, Ida & Esparon, Michelle & Costanza, Robert, 2014. "A new approach to the problem of overlapping values: A case study in Australia׳s Great Barrier Reef," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 10(C), pages 61-78.
    4. Zhou, Shenghua & Yang, Yifan & Ng, S. Thomas & Xu, J. Frank & Li, Dezhi, 2020. "Integrating data-driven and physics-based approaches to characterize failures of interdependent infrastructures," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 31(C).
    5. Bilgili, Tsvetomira V. & Kedia, Ben L. & Bilgili, Hansin, 2016. "Exploring the influence of resource environments on absorptive capacity development: The case of emerging market firms," Journal of World Business, Elsevier, vol. 51(5), pages 700-712.
    6. Ji, Xingpei & Wang, Bo & Liu, Dichen & Chen, Guo & Tang, Fei & Wei, Daqian & Tu, Lian, 2016. "Improving interdependent networks robustness by adding connectivity links," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 444(C), pages 9-19.
    7. Sun, Jiazhe & Wu, Shunan & Yang, Kaizhong, 2018. "An ecosystemic framework for business sustainability," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 61(1), pages 59-72.
    8. Gu, Xinhua & Wu, Jie & Guo, Haizhen & Li, Guoqiang, 2018. "Local tourism cycle and external business cycle," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 159-170.
    9. Alkhaleel, Basem A., 2024. "Machine learning applications in the resilience of interdependent critical infrastructure systems—A systematic literature review," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    10. Wang, Shuliang & Lv, Wenzhuo & Zhang, Jianhua & Luan, Shengyang & Chen, Chen & Gu, Xifeng, 2021. "Method of power network critical nodes identification and robustness enhancement based on a cooperative framework," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    11. Wang, Shuaian, 2016. "Fundamental properties and pseudo-polynomial-time algorithm for network containership sailing speed optimization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 250(1), pages 46-55.
    12. Bloomfield, Robin E. & Popov, Peter & Salako, Kizito & Stankovic, Vladimir & Wright, David, 2017. "Preliminary interdependency analysis: An approach to support critical-infrastructure risk-assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 198-217.
    13. Erling Barth & James C. Davis & Richard B. Freeman & Andrew J. Wang, 2018. "The Effects of Scientists and Engineers on Productivity and Earnings at the Establishment Where They Work," NBER Chapters, in: US Engineering in a Global Economy, pages 167-191, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    14. Suo, Weilan & Wang, Lin & Li, Jianping, 2021. "Probabilistic risk assessment for interdependent critical infrastructures: A scenario-driven dynamic stochastic model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 214(C).
    15. Eliza Chilimoniuk-Przeździecka & Andżelika Kuźnar, 2016. "Znaczenie usług w globalnych łańcuchach wartości," Gospodarka Narodowa. The Polish Journal of Economics, Warsaw School of Economics, issue 5, pages 141-156.
    16. Andrey Nechaev & Oksana Antipina, 2016. "Analysis of the Impact of Taxation of Business Entities on the Innovative Development of the Country," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(1), pages 71-83.
    17. Masato Yamazaki & Atsushi Koike & Yoshinori Sone, 2018. "A Heuristic Approach to the Estimation of Key Parameters for a Monthly, Recursive, Dynamic CGE Model," Economics of Disasters and Climate Change, Springer, vol. 2(3), pages 283-301, October.
    18. Genge, Béla & Siaterlis, Christos, 2013. "Analysis of the effects of distributed denial-of-service attacks on MPLS networks," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 6(2), pages 87-95.
    19. Haidar, Ahmed M.A. & Muttaqi, Kashem & Sutanto, Danny, 2015. "Smart Grid and its future perspectives in Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 1375-1389.
    20. Johnson, Caroline A. & Flage, Roger & Guikema, Seth D., 2021. "Feasibility study of PRA for critical infrastructure risk analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:145:y:2016:i:c:p:136-146. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.