IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v144y2015icp296-310.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Some acceleration methods for Monte Carlo simulation of rare events

Author

Listed:
  • Estecahandy, M.
  • Bordes, L.
  • Collas, S.
  • Paroissin, C.

Abstract

The reliability analysis of instrumented safety systems is an important industrial issue. The standard modeling languages (e.g., Fault trees and Markov chains) and methods employed for these studies become difficult to apply mainly because of the increasing complexity of the operating context (e.g., maintenance policies and aging process). Thus, a powerful alternative is Petri nets associated with Monte Carlo simulation (MC). However, obtaining accurate estimators on rare events (system failures) requires very long computing times. To address this issue, common methods are not well-suited to Petri nets whereas the “Méthode de Conditionnement Temporel†(MCT), a truncation method, seems to be. Indeed, MCT is independent of the duration distributions involved in a model. However, it is only defined when the rare event consists in reaching an absorbing state. To overcome this limitation, we first propose an extension of MCT (EMCT) to cases of repeated cycles where the failure event is either direct or in competition with other events. Numerical results show that EMCT gives better estimates than MC. Second, we introduce a new computational technique, called Dissociation Method, for systems with independent components. We combine it with both MC and EMCT. Through different numerical examples, we observe a significant improvement of the results.

Suggested Citation

  • Estecahandy, M. & Bordes, L. & Collas, S. & Paroissin, C., 2015. "Some acceleration methods for Monte Carlo simulation of rare events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 296-310.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:144:y:2015:i:c:p:296-310
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2015.07.010
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832015002008
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2015.07.010?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Y Dutuit & A B Rauzy & J-P Signoret, 2008. "A snapshot of methods and tools to assess safety integrity levels of high-integrity protection systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 222(3), pages 371-379, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Medeiros, C.P. & Alencar, M.H. & de Almeida, A.T., 2017. "Multidimensional risk evaluation of natural gas pipelines based on a multicriteria decision model using visualization tools and statistical tests for global sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 268-276.
    2. Fan-Yun Pai & Tsu-Ming Yeh & Yung-Hsien Hung, 2015. "Analysis on Accuracy of Bias, Linearity and Stability of Measurement System in Ball screw Processes by Simulation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 7(11), pages 1-23, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Yiliu & Rausand, Marvin, 2013. "Reliability effects of test strategies on safety-instrumented systems in different demand modes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 235-243.
    2. Meng, Huixing & Kloul, Leïla & Rauzy, Antoine, 2018. "Modeling patterns for reliability assessment of safety instrumented systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 111-123.
    3. Innal, Fares & Lundteigen, Mary Ann & Liu, Yiliu & Barros, Anne, 2016. "PFDavg generalized formulas for SIS subject to partial and full periodic tests based on multi-phase Markov models," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 160-170.
    4. Cacheux, Pierre-Joseph & Collas, Stéphane & Dutuit, Yves & Folleau, Cyrille & Signoret, Jean-Pierre & Thomas, Philippe, 2013. "Assessment of the expected number and frequency of failures of periodically tested systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 61-70.
    5. Innal, Fares & Dutuit, Yves & Chebila, Mourad, 2015. "Safety and operational integrity evaluation and design optimization of safety instrumented systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 32-50.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:144:y:2015:i:c:p:296-310. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.