IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v131y2014icp66-82.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Space-partition method for the variance-based sensitivity analysis: Optimal partition scheme and comparative study

Author

Listed:
  • Zhai, Qingqing
  • Yang, Jun
  • Zhao, Yu

Abstract

Variance-based sensitivity analysis has been widely studied and asserted itself among practitioners. Monte Carlo simulation methods are well developed in the calculation of variance-based sensitivity indices but they do not make full use of each model run. Recently, several works mentioned a scatter-plot partitioning method to estimate the variance-based sensitivity indices from given data, where a single bunch of samples is sufficient to estimate all the sensitivity indices. This paper focuses on the space-partition method in the estimation of variance-based sensitivity indices, and its convergence and other performances are investigated. Since the method heavily depends on the partition scheme, the influence of the partition scheme is discussed and the optimal partition scheme is proposed based on the minimized estimator׳s variance. A decomposition and integration procedure is proposed to improve the estimation quality for higher order sensitivity indices. The proposed space-partition method is compared with the more traditional method and test cases show that it outperforms the traditional one.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhai, Qingqing & Yang, Jun & Zhao, Yu, 2014. "Space-partition method for the variance-based sensitivity analysis: Optimal partition scheme and comparative study," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 66-82.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:131:y:2014:i:c:p:66-82
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2014.06.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832014001434
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2014.06.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blatman, Géraud & Sudret, Bruno, 2010. "Efficient computation of global sensitivity indices using sparse polynomial chaos expansions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(11), pages 1216-1229.
    2. Borgonovo, E., 2007. "A new uncertainty importance measure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(6), pages 771-784.
    3. Xu, Chonggang & Gertner, George Zdzislaw, 2008. "A general first-order global sensitivity analysis method," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(7), pages 1060-1071.
    4. Zio, Enrico & Podofillini, Luca, 2006. "Accounting for components interactions in the differential importance measure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(10), pages 1163-1174.
    5. Plischke, Elmar, 2012. "An adaptive correlation ratio method using the cumulative sum of the reordered output," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 149-156.
    6. Tarantola, S. & Gatelli, D. & Mara, T.A., 2006. "Random balance designs for the estimation of first order global sensitivity indices," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 91(6), pages 717-727.
    7. Peng, Rui & Mo, Huadong & Xie, Min & Levitin, Gregory, 2013. "Optimal structure of multi-state systems with multi-fault coverage," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 18-25.
    8. Haro Sandoval, Eduardo & Anstett-Collin, Floriane & Basset, Michel, 2012. "Sensitivity study of dynamic systems using polynomial chaos," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 15-26.
    9. Jeremy E. Oakley & Anthony O'Hagan, 2004. "Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of complex models: a Bayesian approach," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 66(3), pages 751-769, August.
    10. Ye, Zhisheng & Li, Zhizhong & Xie, Min, 2010. "Some improvements on adaptive genetic algorithms for reliability-related applications," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 95(2), pages 120-126.
    11. Hong-Zhong Huang & Jian Qu & Ming Zuo, 2009. "Genetic-algorithm-based optimal apportionment of reliability and redundancy under multiple objectives," IISE Transactions, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(4), pages 287-298.
    12. Xu, C. & Gertner, G., 2007. "Extending a global sensitivity analysis technique to models with correlated parameters," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 51(12), pages 5579-5590, August.
    13. Rahman, Sharif, 2011. "Global sensitivity analysis by polynomial dimensional decomposition," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 96(7), pages 825-837.
    14. Xu, Chonggang & Gertner, George, 2011. "Understanding and comparisons of different sampling approaches for the Fourier Amplitudes Sensitivity Test (FAST)," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 184-198, January.
    15. Oladyshkin, S. & Nowak, W., 2012. "Data-driven uncertainty quantification using the arbitrary polynomial chaos expansion," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 179-190.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Wu, Di & Liu, Xiang-dong & Yan, Xiang-bin & Peng, Rui & Li, Gang, 2019. "Equilibrium analysis of bitcoin block withholding attack: A generalized model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 318-328.
    2. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Plischke, Elmar, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis: A review of recent advances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 869-887.
    3. Ma, Yuan-Zhuo & Jin, Xiang-Xiang & Zhao, Xiang & Li, Hong-Shuang & Zhao, Zhen-Zhou & Xu, Chang, 2024. "Reliability-oriented global sensitivity analysis using subset simulation and space partition," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 242(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Wei, Pengfei & Lu, Zhenzhou & Song, Jingwen, 2015. "Variable importance analysis: A comprehensive review," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 399-432.
    2. Borgonovo, Emanuele & Plischke, Elmar, 2016. "Sensitivity analysis: A review of recent advances," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 248(3), pages 869-887.
    3. Plischke, Elmar & Borgonovo, Emanuele & Smith, Curtis L., 2013. "Global sensitivity measures from given data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 226(3), pages 536-550.
    4. Song, Xiaodong & Bryan, Brett A. & Almeida, Auro C. & Paul, Keryn I. & Zhao, Gang & Ren, Yin, 2013. "Time-dependent sensitivity of a process-based ecological model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 265(C), pages 114-123.
    5. Mirko Ginocchi & Ferdinanda Ponci & Antonello Monti, 2021. "Sensitivity Analysis and Power Systems: Can We Bridge the Gap? A Review and a Guide to Getting Started," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-59, December.
    6. Zhang, Xufang & Pandey, Mahesh D., 2014. "An effective approximation for variance-based global sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 164-174.
    7. Xu, Chonggang & Gertner, George, 2011. "Understanding and comparisons of different sampling approaches for the Fourier Amplitudes Sensitivity Test (FAST)," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 55(1), pages 184-198, January.
    8. Wei, Pengfei & Lu, Zhenzhou & Song, Jingwen, 2015. "Regional and parametric sensitivity analysis of Sobol׳ indices," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 87-100.
    9. Xu, Chonggang & Gertner, George Z., 2009. "Uncertainty analysis of transient population dynamics," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 220(3), pages 283-293.
    10. Daneshkhah, Alireza & Bedford, Tim, 2013. "Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of system availability using Gaussian processes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 82-93.
    11. Wei, Pengfei & Lu, Zhenzhou & Ruan, Wenbin & Song, Jingwen, 2014. "Regional sensitivity analysis using revised mean and variance ratio functions," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 121-135.
    12. Cheng, Lei & Lu, Zhenzhou & Zhang, Leigang, 2015. "Application of Rejection Sampling based methodology to variance based parametric sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 9-18.
    13. Barry Anderson & Emanuele Borgonovo & Marzio Galeotti & Roberto Roson, 2014. "Uncertainty in Climate Change Modeling: Can Global Sensitivity Analysis Be of Help?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 34(2), pages 271-293, February.
    14. Wang, Zhenqiang & Jia, Gaofeng, 2020. "Augmented sample-based approach for efficient evaluation of risk sensitivity with respect to epistemic uncertainty in distribution parameters," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 197(C).
    15. Pesenti, Silvana M. & Millossovich, Pietro & Tsanakas, Andreas, 2019. "Reverse sensitivity testing: What does it take to break the model?," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(2), pages 654-670.
    16. Chen, Xin & Molina-Cristóbal, Arturo & Guenov, Marin D. & Riaz, Atif, 2019. "Efficient method for variance-based sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 97-115.
    17. Mara, Thierry A. & Tarantola, Stefano, 2012. "Variance-based sensitivity indices for models with dependent inputs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 115-121.
    18. Tissot, Jean-Yves & Prieur, Clémentine, 2012. "Bias correction for the estimation of sensitivity indices based on random balance designs," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 107(C), pages 205-213.
    19. Haro Sandoval, Eduardo & Anstett-Collin, Floriane & Basset, Michel, 2012. "Sensitivity study of dynamic systems using polynomial chaos," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 15-26.
    20. Becker, William, 2020. "Metafunctions for benchmarking in sensitivity analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:131:y:2014:i:c:p:66-82. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.