IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/reensy/v111y2013icp106-111.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Restrictions of point estimate methods and remedy

Author

Listed:
  • Lin, Zhenhua
  • Li, Wenyuan

Abstract

Point estimate methods (PEMs) are widely applied to approximately estimate the moments and uncertainty of a random output variable in reliability evaluation and other engineering applications due to its computational efficiency and satisfactory accuracy. However, as any numerical approximation method, PEMs have their own limitations and should be used with caution. Unfortunately, although a lot of papers on point estimate methods have been published so far, almost none of them mentioned the limitations and restrictions of PEMs. In this paper, the restrictions of PEMs are theoretically analyzed and discussed with illustrative examples. A remedy for the restrictions is presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin, Zhenhua & Li, Wenyuan, 2013. "Restrictions of point estimate methods and remedy," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 106-111.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:111:y:2013:i:c:p:106-111
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2012.10.016
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0951832012002190
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.ress.2012.10.016?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rusin, Andrzej M., 2007. "Technical risk involved in long-term operation of steam turbines," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(9), pages 1242-1249.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chen, Jun-Yu & Feng, Yun-Wen & Teng, Da & Lu, Cheng & Fei, Cheng-Wei, 2022. "Support vector machine-based similarity selection method for structural transient reliability analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Martyna Tomala & Andrzej Rusin & Adam Wojaczek, 2020. "Risk-Based Planning of Diagnostic Testing of Turbines Operating with Increased Flexibility," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Babiarz, Bożena & Blokus, Agnieszka, 2020. "Dependency of technological lines in reliability analysis of heat production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    3. Rusin, Andrzej & Bieniek, Michał, 2017. "Maintenance planning of power plant elements based on avoided risk value," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 134(C), pages 672-680.
    4. Rusin, Andrzej & Bieniek, Michał & Lipka, Marian, 2016. "Assessment of the rise in the turbine operation risk due to increased cyclicity of the power unit operation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 96(C), pages 394-403.
    5. Bożena Babiarz, 2018. "Aspects of Heat Supply Security Management Using Elements of Decision Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-14, October.
    6. Paweł Ziółkowski & Marta Drosińska-Komor & Jerzy Głuch & Łukasz Breńkacz, 2023. "Review of Methods for Diagnosing the Degradation Process in Power Units Cooperating with Renewable Energy Sources Using Artificial Intelligence," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-28, August.
    7. Rusin, Andrzej & Wojaczek, Adam, 2019. "Improving the availability and lengthening the life of power unit elements through the use of risk-based maintenance planning," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 28-35.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:reensy:v:111:y:2013:i:c:p:106-111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/reliability-engineering-and-system-safety .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.