IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/recore/v74y2013icp115-123.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A comparison of two models for dealing with urban solid waste: Management by contract and management by public–private partnership

Author

Listed:
  • Marconsin, Adauto Fernandes
  • Rosa, Derval dos Santos

Abstract

In work, we compared two models for dealing with urban solid waste in Brazil, namely, management by contract and management by public–private partnership. Management by contract, which is widely used by the public sector (municipalities) for urban solid waste collection and disposal and for acquiring goods and services for periods not greater than 60 months, is governed by Federal Law 8.666/93. Management by public–private partnership is governed by Federal Law 11.079/04 for contracts worth more than US$11,000,000 and involves costs for the private partner and public partner. The financial return for the private partner must be clearly delineated and the contract should last from 5 to 35 years. Management by public–private partnership that involves the management of municipal solid waste is very recent in Brazil. For this reason, the comparison between the two forms of management of municipal solid waste (management by contract and management by public–private partnership) described in this work is unprecedented in this country. Both of these models are used in the municipality of São Bernardo do Campo in the State of São Paulo, Brazil. For this study, information was gathered through semi-structured interviews with public works managers in São Bernardo do Campo, with members of an Association of Recyclable Material Collectors and with managers of a company contracted by the São Bernardo do Campo city hall, and also by researching public documents provided by the city hall. The interviews with the managers of the municipality of São Bernardo do Campo, the Association and the company were held in the headquarters of each institution. The documents analyzed, such as the plan for dealing with municipal solid waste, contracts and bids were made available electronically. Analysis of the results indicated that management by a public–private partnership was more advantageous for dealing with urban solid waste than management by contract since the former provided a strong selective collection program, reduced the amount of solid waste sent to sanitary embankments, led to the recovery an area of land previously degraded by the incorrect disposal of urban solid waste and stimulated the installation of an energy recovery unit.

Suggested Citation

  • Marconsin, Adauto Fernandes & Rosa, Derval dos Santos, 2013. "A comparison of two models for dealing with urban solid waste: Management by contract and management by public–private partnership," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 115-123.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:74:y:2013:i:c:p:115-123
    DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.02.005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921344913000347
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.02.005?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Blengini, Gian Andrea, 2008. "Using LCA to evaluate impacts and resources conservation potential of composting: A case study of the Asti District in Italy," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(12), pages 1373-1381.
    2. Mühle, S. & Balsam, I. & Cheeseman, C.R., 2010. "Comparison of carbon emissions associated with municipal solid waste management in Germany and the UK," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(11), pages 793-801.
    3. Klang, Anders Brandén & Vikman, Per-Åke & Brattebø, Helge, 2008. "Sustainable management of combustible household waste—Expanding the integrated evaluation model," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 52(8), pages 1101-1111.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Giovanni Biancini & Barbara Marchetti & Luca Cioccolanti & Matteo Moglie, 2022. "Comprehensive Life Cycle Assessment Analysis of an Italian Composting Facility concerning Environmental Footprint Minimization and Renewable Energy Integration," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    2. Quirós, Roberto & Villalba, Gara & Muñoz, Pere & Colón, Joan & Font, Xavier & Gabarrell, Xavier, 2014. "Environmental assessment of two home composts with high and low gaseous emissions of the composting process," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 9-20.
    3. Butler, John & Hooper, Paul, 2010. "Down to Earth: An illustration of life cycle inventory good practice with reference to the production of soil conditioning compost," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 135-147.
    4. Luciano Rodrigues Viana & Pierre-Luc Dessureault & Charles Marty & Jean-François Boucher & Maxime C. Paré, 2023. "Life Cycle Assessment of Oat Flake Production with Two End-of-Life Options for Agro-Industrial Residue Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
    5. Colón, Joan & Martínez-Blanco, Julia & Gabarrell, Xavier & Artola, Adriana & Sánchez, Antoni & Rieradevall, Joan & Font, Xavier, 2010. "Environmental assessment of home composting," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(11), pages 893-904.
    6. Laís Fabiana Serafini & Manuel Feliciano & Manuel Angelo Rodrigues & Artur Gonçalves, 2023. "Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Use of LCA to Assess the Environmental Impacts of the Composting Process," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-33, January.
    7. Franchetti, Matthew & Kilaru, Prabhu, 2012. "Modeling the impact of municipal solid waste recycling on greenhouse gas emissions in Ohio, USA," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 58(C), pages 107-113.
    8. De Silva, Lihini & Taylor, Rebecca, 2021. "If you build it, they will compost: The effects of municipal composting services on household waste generation," 2021 Annual Meeting, August 1-3, Austin, Texas 313874, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    9. Cifrian, Eva & Galan, Berta & Andres, Ana & Viguri, Javier R., 2012. "Material flow indicators and carbon footprint for MSW management systems: Analysis and application at regional level, Cantabria, Spain," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 54-66.
    10. Závodská, A. & Benešová, L. & Smyth, B. & Morrissey, A.J., 2014. "A comparison of biodegradable municipal waste (BMW) management strategies in Ireland and the Czech Republic and the lessons learned," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 136-144.
    11. Francesco Di Maria & Amani Maalouf, 2023. "Application of Entropy-Based Ecologic Indicators for Intrinsic Sustainability Assessment of EU27 Member States Waste Management Systems at Technosphere Level," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, January.
    12. Dong, Xin & He, Bao-Jie, 2023. "A standardized assessment framework for green roof decarbonization: A review of embodied carbon, carbon sequestration, bioenergy supply, and operational carbon scenarios," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    13. Maria Antoniadou & Theodoros Varzakas & Ioannis Tzoutzas, 2021. "Circular Economy in Conjunction with Treatment Methodologies in the Biomedical and Dental Waste Sectors," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 1(2), pages 563-592, September.
    14. Angela Maffia & Federica Marra & Giuseppe Celano & Mariateresa Oliva & Carmelo Mallamaci & Muhammad Iftikhar Hussain & Adele Muscolo, 2024. "Exploring the Potential and Obstacles of Agro-Industrial Waste-Based Fertilizers," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-18, July.
    15. Wang, Yuan & Yan, Yuanyuan & Chen, Guanyi & Zuo, Jian & Du, Huibin, 2015. "Effective approaches to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from waste to energy process: A China study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 104(PA), pages 103-108.
    16. Caponi, Vincenzo, 2022. "The economic and environmental effects of seasonality of tourism: A look at solid waste," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    17. Fragkou, Maria Christina & Vicent, Teresa & Gabarrell, Xavier, 2010. "A general methodology for calculating the MSW management self-sufficiency indicator: Application to the wider Barcelona area," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(6), pages 390-399.
    18. Martínez-Blanco, Julia & Muñoz, Pere & Antón, Assumpció & Rieradevall, Joan, 2009. "Life cycle assessment of the use of compost from municipal organic waste for fertilization of tomato crops," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 53(6), pages 340-351.
    19. Blengini, G.A. & Brizio, E. & Cibrario, M. & Genon, G., 2011. "LCA of bioenergy chains in Piedmont (Italy): A case study to support public decision makers towards sustainability," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 36-47.
    20. A. C. (Thanos) Bourtsalas & Tianxiao Shen & Yixi Tian, 2022. "A Comprehensive Assessment of Products Management and Energy Recovery from Waste Products in the United States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-20, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:recore:v:74:y:2013:i:c:p:115-123. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kai Meng (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.journals.elsevier.com/resources-conservation-and-recycling .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.